A Students’ Preferences-Based Approach to Select Methods for Detecting and Handling Free-Riding

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Marketing Education Pub Date : 2021-02-16 DOI:10.1177/0273475321992109
Else-Marie van den Herik, T. Benning
{"title":"A Students’ Preferences-Based Approach to Select Methods for Detecting and Handling Free-Riding","authors":"Else-Marie van den Herik, T. Benning","doi":"10.1177/0273475321992109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Free-riding is a serious challenge in group projects. While there are various methods to reduce free-riding, marketing educators still face a difficult task when selecting an appropriate method for their course. In this study, we propose a students’ preferences-based approach that supports marketing educators with the selection of methods to detect and handle free-riding. To measure these preferences, students completed an online survey based on a choice task about two methods to detect free-riding and a ranking task about four methods to handle free-riding (n = 254). Their answers were analyzed using chi-squared tests, Borda scores, and rank-ordered logit models. The results show that (a) neither Dutch nor international students have a clear preference for one of the two detection methods (the reporting system vs. the process evaluation system), (b) grade discussion (a possible reduction of the free-rider’s grade based on a conversation with the course coordinator about each student’s contribution) is the most preferred method to handle free-riding, and (c) international students have a stronger preference for stricter handling methods. Marketing educators can apply the proposed approach, or use our specific findings, for designing methods to reduce free-riding in their courses.","PeriodicalId":46987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing Education","volume":"43 1","pages":"233 - 243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0273475321992109","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475321992109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Free-riding is a serious challenge in group projects. While there are various methods to reduce free-riding, marketing educators still face a difficult task when selecting an appropriate method for their course. In this study, we propose a students’ preferences-based approach that supports marketing educators with the selection of methods to detect and handle free-riding. To measure these preferences, students completed an online survey based on a choice task about two methods to detect free-riding and a ranking task about four methods to handle free-riding (n = 254). Their answers were analyzed using chi-squared tests, Borda scores, and rank-ordered logit models. The results show that (a) neither Dutch nor international students have a clear preference for one of the two detection methods (the reporting system vs. the process evaluation system), (b) grade discussion (a possible reduction of the free-rider’s grade based on a conversation with the course coordinator about each student’s contribution) is the most preferred method to handle free-riding, and (c) international students have a stronger preference for stricter handling methods. Marketing educators can apply the proposed approach, or use our specific findings, for designing methods to reduce free-riding in their courses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于学生偏好的自由骑行检测和处理方法选择方法
在团体项目中,搭便车是一个严重的挑战。虽然有各种各样的方法来减少搭便车,但营销教育者在为他们的课程选择合适的方法时仍然面临着一个艰巨的任务。在本研究中,我们提出了一种基于学生偏好的方法,支持营销教育者选择方法来检测和处理搭便车。为了测量这些偏好,学生们完成了一项基于两种检测搭便车方法的选择任务和四种处理搭便车方法的排名任务的在线调查(n = 254)。他们的回答使用卡方检验、博尔达分数和秩序logit模型进行分析。结果表明:(a)荷兰学生和国际学生对两种检测方法(报告系统与过程评估系统)中的一种都没有明确的偏好,(b)分数讨论(根据与课程协调员就每个学生的贡献进行对话可能降低搭便车者的分数)是最受欢迎的处理搭便车的方法,(c)国际学生对更严格的处理方法有更强的偏好。营销教育工作者可以应用我们提出的方法,或者使用我们的具体发现来设计方法,以减少在他们的课程中搭便车。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Marketing Education
Journal of Marketing Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Journal of Marketing Education is the leading international scholarly journal devoted to contemporary issues in marketing education. Its mission is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas, information, and experiences related to the process of educating students in marketing and its subfields. Its audience is largely composed of marketing faculty members at institutions of higher education where teaching is an integral component of their overall responsibilities. The main function of the Journal of Marketing Education is to publish articles focusing on the latest teaching/learning strategies and tactics in marketing education.
期刊最新文献
The Future of Marketing and Marketing Education Students as Value Co-Creators in the Business Education Ecosystem Embedding the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Marketing Education The Importance of Brand Equity in the Business of Marketing Education Enhancing Legitimacy: A Pathway to Strategy Renewal of Business Schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1