Combined postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization and portal vein chemotherapy to treat patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombosis: a meta-analysis

Q. Ke, Lei Wang, Nanping Lin, Fuli Xin, Yongyi Zeng, Jingfeng Liu
{"title":"Combined postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization and portal vein chemotherapy to treat patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombosis: a meta-analysis","authors":"Q. Ke, Lei Wang, Nanping Lin, Fuli Xin, Yongyi Zeng, Jingfeng Liu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo systematically review the clinical effectiveness of combined postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with portal vein chemotherapy (PVC) versus TACE alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). \n \n \nMethods \nDatabases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline, Web of Science, CNKI, China Biology Medicine, Wan Fang and VIP were searched from Jan 1st 2000 to Jun 30th 2019 for eligible studies on clinical effectiveness of combined postoperative adjuvant TACE with PVC versus TACE alone in patients with HCC and PVTT. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoint was adverse events. These endpoints were evaluated by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using Review Manager 5.3 software. \n \n \nResults \nNine studies with 642 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. There were 323 patients in the TACE group and 319 patients in the TACE plus PVC group. The pooled OR for the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS were all significantly better in the TACE plus PVC group than the TACE group (1-year OS, OR=2.20, 95% CI: 1.53-3.17; 2-year OS, OR=2.44, 95% CI: 1.69-3.53; 3-year OS, OR=2.30, 95% CI: 1.52-3.46) (all P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nPostoperative adjuvant TACE combined with PVC for patients with HCC and PVTT was safe and effective, and was significantly better than TACE alone in long-term prognosis. Large-scale, multi-center, prospective studies are needed to support the conclusion. \n \n \nKey words: \nCarcinoma, hepatocellular; Portal vein tumor thrombosis; Transarterial chemoembolization; Portal vein chemotherapy; Meta-analysis","PeriodicalId":10021,"journal":{"name":"中华肝胆外科杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"192-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肝胆外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.03.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To systematically review the clinical effectiveness of combined postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with portal vein chemotherapy (PVC) versus TACE alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Methods Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline, Web of Science, CNKI, China Biology Medicine, Wan Fang and VIP were searched from Jan 1st 2000 to Jun 30th 2019 for eligible studies on clinical effectiveness of combined postoperative adjuvant TACE with PVC versus TACE alone in patients with HCC and PVTT. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoint was adverse events. These endpoints were evaluated by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using Review Manager 5.3 software. Results Nine studies with 642 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. There were 323 patients in the TACE group and 319 patients in the TACE plus PVC group. The pooled OR for the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS were all significantly better in the TACE plus PVC group than the TACE group (1-year OS, OR=2.20, 95% CI: 1.53-3.17; 2-year OS, OR=2.44, 95% CI: 1.69-3.53; 3-year OS, OR=2.30, 95% CI: 1.52-3.46) (all P 0.05). Conclusion Postoperative adjuvant TACE combined with PVC for patients with HCC and PVTT was safe and effective, and was significantly better than TACE alone in long-term prognosis. Large-scale, multi-center, prospective studies are needed to support the conclusion. Key words: Carcinoma, hepatocellular; Portal vein tumor thrombosis; Transarterial chemoembolization; Portal vein chemotherapy; Meta-analysis
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术后辅助经动脉化疗栓塞联合门静脉化疗治疗肝癌合并门静脉肿瘤血栓形成的meta分析
目的系统评价术后辅助经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合门静脉化疗(PVC)与单独TACE治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)合并门静脉肿瘤血栓(PVTT)的临床疗效。方法检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Medline、Web of Science、CNKI、中国生物医学、万方、VIP等数据库,检索2000年1月1日至2019年6月30日HCC合并PVTT患者术后辅助TACE联合PVC与单独TACE的临床疗效对比研究。主要终点是总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。次要终点是不良事件。使用Review Manager 5.3软件对这些终点进行比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)评估。结果本荟萃分析纳入了9项研究,642例患者。TACE组323例,TACE + PVC组319例。1年、2年和3年的总生存率,TACE + PVC组均显著优于TACE组(1年生存率,OR=2.20, 95% CI: 1.53-3.17;2年OS, OR=2.44, 95% CI: 1.69-3.53;3年OS, OR=2.30, 95% CI: 1.52-3.46)(均P < 0.05)。结论肝癌合并PVTT患者术后辅助TACE联合PVC治疗安全有效,远期预后明显优于TACE。需要大规模、多中心、前瞻性的研究来支持这一结论。关键词:肝癌;肝细胞癌;门静脉肿瘤血栓形成;动脉化疗;门静脉化疗;荟萃分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华肝胆外科杂志
中华肝胆外科杂志 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7101
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery is an academic journal organized by the Chinese Medical Association and supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology, founded in 1995. The journal has the following columns: review, hot spotlight, academic thinking, thesis, experimental research, short thesis, case report, synthesis, etc. The journal has been recognized by Beida Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences). Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery has been included in famous databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Source Journals of China Science Citation Database (with Extended Version) and so on, and it is one of the national key academic journals under the supervision of China Association for Science and Technology.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic efficacy of external and internal-external percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice Combined postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization and portal vein chemotherapy to treat patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombosis: a meta-analysis Retrograde approach to the retroperitoneal Castleman disease: a case report and literature review Application of laparoscopy in liver metastasis of colorectal cancer Hepatic biloma after minimally invasive interventional therapies: treatment and outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1