Lockdown and Breakdown in Italians' Reactions on Twitter during the First Phase of Covid-19

IF 0.9 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Partecipazione e Conflitto Pub Date : 2021-06-24 DOI:10.1285/i20356609v14i1p261
G. B. Artieri, F. Greco, G. L. Rocca
{"title":"Lockdown and Breakdown in Italians' Reactions on Twitter during the First Phase of Covid-19","authors":"G. B. Artieri, F. Greco, G. L. Rocca","doi":"10.1285/i20356609v14i1p261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on Italians' reactions to the pandemic on Twitter. During the first phase of the 2020 lockdown (from the beginning of March 2020 - to the beginning of May 2020), a real-time dataset was built, linking data scratching to three events related to the introduction of the Prime Minister's decrees and his press conferences. The chosen observation point is Twitter, platform that allows us to monitor the emergence of discussions on public issues, extremely synchronized with events and news – which is, moreover, a feature of use of this platform. The coronavirus hashtag was chosen as a mechanism to track the development of Italian reactions, following the evolution of its sense and sensemaking and considering it as a polysemic collector. The aim is to identify within the tweets the actors, the topics, and the tone of the debate in an open public space. Furthermore, the analysis is carried out in search of the Italians' perception of the lockdown and whether they are in favor of it because of the defense of public health or they see it as a restriction of their individual freedom. The analysis, which used the socio-constructivist approach of Emotional Text Mining, reveals two explanatory-dimensions in the governance of the crisis: lockdown and breakdown and allows us to understand the reasons for Twitter's instinct-reactions.","PeriodicalId":45168,"journal":{"name":"Partecipazione e Conflitto","volume":"14 1","pages":"261-282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Partecipazione e Conflitto","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v14i1p261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The article focuses on Italians' reactions to the pandemic on Twitter. During the first phase of the 2020 lockdown (from the beginning of March 2020 - to the beginning of May 2020), a real-time dataset was built, linking data scratching to three events related to the introduction of the Prime Minister's decrees and his press conferences. The chosen observation point is Twitter, platform that allows us to monitor the emergence of discussions on public issues, extremely synchronized with events and news – which is, moreover, a feature of use of this platform. The coronavirus hashtag was chosen as a mechanism to track the development of Italian reactions, following the evolution of its sense and sensemaking and considering it as a polysemic collector. The aim is to identify within the tweets the actors, the topics, and the tone of the debate in an open public space. Furthermore, the analysis is carried out in search of the Italians' perception of the lockdown and whether they are in favor of it because of the defense of public health or they see it as a restriction of their individual freedom. The analysis, which used the socio-constructivist approach of Emotional Text Mining, reveals two explanatory-dimensions in the governance of the crisis: lockdown and breakdown and allows us to understand the reasons for Twitter's instinct-reactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎第一阶段意大利人在推特上的反应
这篇文章主要关注意大利人在推特上对疫情的反应。在2020年封锁的第一阶段(2020年3月初至2020年5月初),建立了一个实时数据集,将数据抓取与总理法令出台和新闻发布会相关的三个事件联系起来。我们选择的观察点是Twitter,这个平台可以让我们监控公共问题讨论的出现,与事件和新闻高度同步——这也是使用这个平台的一个特点。冠状病毒标签被选为追踪意大利反应发展的机制,遵循其意义和语义的演变,并将其视为多义性收集器。其目的是在一个开放的公共空间中识别推文中的演员、话题和辩论的语气。此外,还进行了分析,以了解意大利人对封锁的看法,以及他们是出于对公共卫生的保护而支持封锁,还是将其视为对个人自由的限制。该分析使用了情感文本挖掘的社会建构主义方法,揭示了危机治理中的两个解释维度:封锁和崩溃,并使我们能够理解Twitter本能反应的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Partecipazione e Conflitto
Partecipazione e Conflitto POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: PArtecipazione e COnflitto [PArticipation and COnflict] is an International Journal based in Italy specialized in social and political studies. PACO houses research and studies on the transformations of politics and its key players (political parties, interest groups, social movements, associations, unions, etc.), focusing in particular on the dynamics of participation both by individuals acting in conventional ways, and by those who prefer protest-oriented repertoires of action. Special attention is also paid to the dynamics of transformation of contemporary political systems, with an eye fixed on the processes of democratization besides on the spaces opening to the new forms of governance both at local and sub-national, and supra-national level. All are inscribed in that complex phenomenon represented by the trans-nationalization of social, political and economic processes, without neglecting the nation-state dimension. The journal emphasizes innovative studies and research of high methodological rigor, treasuring of the most recent theoretical and empirical contributions in social and political sciences.
期刊最新文献
Community-Led Housing in Yangon: The Struggles of Non-Confrontational Resistance and Feminist Crisis Management The Xi'an Schizophrenia Imaging Lab (SIL) data and ten years of MRI study on schizophrenia. Overcoming the limits of EMU through Covid? Next Generation EU against the unaddressed needs for ambitious structural reform The Political Economy of a Collusive Urban Regime: Making Sense of Urban Development Projects in Rome (Re)Creating "Society in Silico": Surveillance Capitalism, Simulations and Subjectivity in the Cambridge Analytica Data Scandal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1