Stereology volume analysis to evaluate teeth’s root using CBCT images

Q3 Medicine Reports in Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.2147/RMI.S153169
A. Fadili, Abdelali Halimi, H. Benyahia, F. Zaoui
{"title":"Stereology volume analysis to evaluate teeth’s root using CBCT images","authors":"A. Fadili, Abdelali Halimi, H. Benyahia, F. Zaoui","doi":"10.2147/RMI.S153169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate a semiautomated segmentation tool designated for the volume measurements of teeth root; this method is based on three-dimensional and focused to follow-up the root’s volume when an orthodontic treatment occurred. Materials and methods: In order to evaluate a semiautomated segmentation tool, a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was selected with 20 intact teeth (10 maxillary and 10 mandibular teeth), CBCT images were imported into the ImageJ software, and the root volumes were measured using two methods (the semiautomated segmentation and the manual segmenta-tion). Both segmentations are carried out by two experts; the manual segmentation served as a reference method and considered as the “gold standard”. The data were analyzed using the Bland–Altman analysis to compare the agreement between methods, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the interobserver reliability. Results: The Bland–Altman analysis revealed the agreement between measurements on semiautomated segmentation and manual segmentation, with a mean bias of –2.09 mm 3 and the 95% limits of agreement of –11.38 to 7.21 mm 3 . The ICC was 0.999 for semiautomated segmentation method and 0.999 for manual segmentation method. Conclusion: The use of stereology employing the ImageJ software and CBCT images provide an accurate and reliable semiautomated segmentation, leading to an approach of volume quantitative analysis to evaluate and follow-up the root’s volume when orthodontic treatment occurred. Further clinical studies are necessary to explore this method.","PeriodicalId":39053,"journal":{"name":"Reports in Medical Imaging","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/RMI.S153169","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports in Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMI.S153169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate a semiautomated segmentation tool designated for the volume measurements of teeth root; this method is based on three-dimensional and focused to follow-up the root’s volume when an orthodontic treatment occurred. Materials and methods: In order to evaluate a semiautomated segmentation tool, a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was selected with 20 intact teeth (10 maxillary and 10 mandibular teeth), CBCT images were imported into the ImageJ software, and the root volumes were measured using two methods (the semiautomated segmentation and the manual segmenta-tion). Both segmentations are carried out by two experts; the manual segmentation served as a reference method and considered as the “gold standard”. The data were analyzed using the Bland–Altman analysis to compare the agreement between methods, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the interobserver reliability. Results: The Bland–Altman analysis revealed the agreement between measurements on semiautomated segmentation and manual segmentation, with a mean bias of –2.09 mm 3 and the 95% limits of agreement of –11.38 to 7.21 mm 3 . The ICC was 0.999 for semiautomated segmentation method and 0.999 for manual segmentation method. Conclusion: The use of stereology employing the ImageJ software and CBCT images provide an accurate and reliable semiautomated segmentation, leading to an approach of volume quantitative analysis to evaluate and follow-up the root’s volume when orthodontic treatment occurred. Further clinical studies are necessary to explore this method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用CBCT图像对牙根进行立体体积分析
目的:本研究的目的是评估一种用于牙根体积测量的半自动分割工具;这种方法是基于三维的,重点是在进行正畸治疗时跟踪牙根的体积。材料和方法:为了评估半自动分割工具,选择20颗完整牙齿(10颗上颌和10颗下颌牙齿)的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT),将CBCT图像导入ImageJ软件,并使用两种方法(半自动分割和手动分割)测量根体积。这两个细分都由两名专家进行;手工分割是一种参考方法,被认为是黄金标准。使用Bland–Altman分析对数据进行分析,以比较方法之间的一致性,并使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估观察者间的可靠性。结果:Bland–Altman分析显示,半自动分割和手动分割的测量结果一致,平均偏差为–2.09 mm 3,95%的一致性极限为–11.38至7.21 mm 3。半自动分割方法和手动分割方法的ICC分别为0.999和0.999。结论:使用ImageJ软件和CBCT图像的体视学提供了准确可靠的半自动分割,从而提供了一种体积定量分析的方法来评估和跟踪正畸治疗时牙根的体积。需要进一步的临床研究来探索这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reports in Medical Imaging
Reports in Medical Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of Magnetic Field Inhomogeneity on the Quality of Magnetic Resonance Images and Compensation Techniques: A Review Lung Perfusion Assessment in Pulmonary Embolism: Novel Semi-Automatic Lung Perfusion Software in Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography Compared to Traditional Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy Nurses’ Roles in Managing Patient Anxiety Before MRI Scans Using Informative Video A “Double” Third Window Syndrome: The Case of Semicircular Canal Dehiscence in Twin Sisters Diagnostic Value of Perfusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Routine Magnetic Resonance Protocols for Adults Presenting with Acute Ischemic Stroke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1