Program Evaluation and Assessment of Vital Sign Measurement at Student-Run Free Ophthalmology Clinics

Shambhawi Thakur, Christian Schmidt, Rohan Sharma, Lydia Sa, Brynn E. Sheehan, Shannon McCole, A. Leader
{"title":"Program Evaluation and Assessment of Vital Sign Measurement at Student-Run Free Ophthalmology Clinics","authors":"Shambhawi Thakur, Christian Schmidt, Rohan Sharma, Lydia Sa, Brynn E. Sheehan, Shannon McCole, A. Leader","doi":"10.59586/jsrc.v8i1.332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Uninsured patients (8.6% of the United States population) are more likely to have poorly controlled diabetes and hypertension, which can lead to altered vision or even blindness. Checking vital signs regularly is important in monitoring chronic diseases to prevent poorer health outcomes, especially in populations with limited access to care. HOPES (Health Outreach Partnership of Eastern Virginia Medical School Students) and CCE (Clínica Comunitaria Esperanza) are student-run free clinics that serve the uninsured population of Hampton Roads, Virginia. This study describes the services offered and examines trends in measuring vital signs at HOPES and CCE Ophthalmology Clinics to evaluate clinical operations and areas for improvement. \nMethods: A retrospective chart review of 347 HOPES and CCE Ophthalmology appointments from January 2015 to June 2021 explored patient demographics, vital sign measurement, reason for visit, diagnoses, and services provided. Chi-square tests were utilized to compare the measurement of vital signs between the two clinics. \nResults: 179 appointments met inclusion criteria. Of the 39 different reasons for visit, the most common were blurry vision, diabetic eye exams, floaters, and systemic hypertension. Of the 63 distinct diagnoses made, the most common were cataracts, diabetes with or without retinopathy, and presbyopia. A total of 175 services were provided, including 61 custom frames and glasses, 48 prescriptions for glasses, 54 medications, and 26 referrals to other providers. Vital signs were obtained during 113 appointments (63.10%) and the frequency of vital sign measurement differed significantly between the two clinics (68.80% at HOPES and 50.00% at CCE), p = 0.02. \nConclusion: Vital signs were not consistently obtained at the HOPES and CCE Ophthalmology clinics despite diabetes and hypertension, diseases with known ophthalmologic sequelae, representing primary reasons for visit. Findings are a call to action for quality improvement measures in clinics to enforce vital sign measurement during every encounter.","PeriodicalId":73958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of student-run clinics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of student-run clinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59586/jsrc.v8i1.332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Uninsured patients (8.6% of the United States population) are more likely to have poorly controlled diabetes and hypertension, which can lead to altered vision or even blindness. Checking vital signs regularly is important in monitoring chronic diseases to prevent poorer health outcomes, especially in populations with limited access to care. HOPES (Health Outreach Partnership of Eastern Virginia Medical School Students) and CCE (Clínica Comunitaria Esperanza) are student-run free clinics that serve the uninsured population of Hampton Roads, Virginia. This study describes the services offered and examines trends in measuring vital signs at HOPES and CCE Ophthalmology Clinics to evaluate clinical operations and areas for improvement. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 347 HOPES and CCE Ophthalmology appointments from January 2015 to June 2021 explored patient demographics, vital sign measurement, reason for visit, diagnoses, and services provided. Chi-square tests were utilized to compare the measurement of vital signs between the two clinics. Results: 179 appointments met inclusion criteria. Of the 39 different reasons for visit, the most common were blurry vision, diabetic eye exams, floaters, and systemic hypertension. Of the 63 distinct diagnoses made, the most common were cataracts, diabetes with or without retinopathy, and presbyopia. A total of 175 services were provided, including 61 custom frames and glasses, 48 prescriptions for glasses, 54 medications, and 26 referrals to other providers. Vital signs were obtained during 113 appointments (63.10%) and the frequency of vital sign measurement differed significantly between the two clinics (68.80% at HOPES and 50.00% at CCE), p = 0.02. Conclusion: Vital signs were not consistently obtained at the HOPES and CCE Ophthalmology clinics despite diabetes and hypertension, diseases with known ophthalmologic sequelae, representing primary reasons for visit. Findings are a call to action for quality improvement measures in clinics to enforce vital sign measurement during every encounter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生免费眼科诊所生命体征测量项目评估
背景:未投保的患者(占美国人口的8.6%)更有可能患有控制不佳的糖尿病和高血压,这可能导致视力改变甚至失明。定期检查生命体征对于监测慢性病以防止较差的健康结果非常重要,尤其是在获得护理机会有限的人群中。HOPES(东弗吉尼亚医学院学生健康外展伙伴关系)和CCE(Clínica Comunitaria Esperanza)是学生经营的免费诊所,为弗吉尼亚州汉普顿路的未参保人群提供服务。这项研究描述了HOPES和CCE眼科诊所提供的服务,并考察了测量生命体征的趋势,以评估临床操作和改进领域。方法:对2015年1月至2021年6月的347次HOPES和CCE眼科预约进行回顾性图表审查,探讨了患者人口统计、生命体征测量、就诊原因、诊断和提供的服务。卡方检验用于比较两个诊所之间的生命体征测量。结果:179个预约符合入选标准。在39种不同的就诊原因中,最常见的是视力模糊、糖尿病眼部检查、漂浮物和系统性高血压。在63种不同的诊断中,最常见的是白内障、糖尿病伴或不伴视网膜病变和老花眼。共提供了175项服务,包括61个定制镜框和眼镜、48个眼镜处方、54种药物和26个转诊给其他提供者。在113次预约中获得了生命体征(63.10%),两个诊所的生命体征测量频率存在显著差异(HOPES为68.80%,CCE为50.00%),p=0.02。结论:尽管糖尿病和高血压是已知的眼科后遗症,也是就诊的主要原因,但HOPES和CCE眼科诊所的生命体征并不一致。研究结果呼吁采取行动,在诊所采取质量改进措施,在每次就诊时强制进行生命体征测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Otolaryngology in Medical Education: Hands-on Training at an SRFC Community Site Improves Medical Student Knowledge and Skills Improving Documentation of and Access to Diabetic Retinopathy Screening at a Student-Run Free Clinic Success and Challenges of Establishing a Teledermatology Pilot Service at a Student-Run Clinic Pushing and Establishing New Frontiers: An Examination of Publication Patterns From 2015-2023 in the Journal of Student-Run Clinics Standardization of Clinic Flow to Improve Patient Experience in a Student-Run Free Clinic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1