The failure of the United States coercive diplomacy in the era of President Donald Trump: Turkey’s persistence in buying S-400

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik Pub Date : 2022-02-08 DOI:10.20473/mkp.v35i12022.58-68
Febry Triantama, Cancera Triane Berliana, Muhammad Yusril I'za
{"title":"The failure of the United States coercive diplomacy in the era of President Donald Trump: Turkey’s persistence in buying S-400","authors":"Febry Triantama, Cancera Triane Berliana, Muhammad Yusril I'za","doi":"10.20473/mkp.v35i12022.58-68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Turkey decided to acquire the S-400 air defense system from Russia in 2017. This decision puts Turkey in the shadow of the United States’ coercive diplomacy through the CAATSA instrument. However, Turkey showed its persistence, as evidenced by the arrival of the S-400 in Turkey in 2019. This study aims to find out the reason for Turkey’s persistence using the concept of coercive diplomacy and descriptive-analytical methods. This article concludes that the reason for Turkey’s persistence in buying S-400 was the implementation of United States coercive diplomacy through CAATSA that tends to be “half-hearted”. “Half-hearted” coercive diplomacy done by the United States made all three strategies for a successful and effective coercive diplomacy cannot be achieved. First, the demands and threats presented did not have strong credibility and legitimacy. Second, the Turkish government’s lack of urgency in complying with the US demands contributed to the cause of such persistence. Finally, the absence of time pressure is also important to assure a successful and effective coercive diplomacy.","PeriodicalId":55930,"journal":{"name":"Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.v35i12022.58-68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Turkey decided to acquire the S-400 air defense system from Russia in 2017. This decision puts Turkey in the shadow of the United States’ coercive diplomacy through the CAATSA instrument. However, Turkey showed its persistence, as evidenced by the arrival of the S-400 in Turkey in 2019. This study aims to find out the reason for Turkey’s persistence using the concept of coercive diplomacy and descriptive-analytical methods. This article concludes that the reason for Turkey’s persistence in buying S-400 was the implementation of United States coercive diplomacy through CAATSA that tends to be “half-hearted”. “Half-hearted” coercive diplomacy done by the United States made all three strategies for a successful and effective coercive diplomacy cannot be achieved. First, the demands and threats presented did not have strong credibility and legitimacy. Second, the Turkish government’s lack of urgency in complying with the US demands contributed to the cause of such persistence. Finally, the absence of time pressure is also important to assure a successful and effective coercive diplomacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特朗普时代美国强制外交的失败:土耳其坚持购买S-400
2017年,土耳其决定从俄罗斯获得S-400防空系统。这一决定将土耳其置于美国通过CAATSA文书进行胁迫性外交的阴影之下。然而,土耳其表现出了它的坚持,2019年S-400抵达土耳其就是明证。本研究旨在运用胁迫外交的概念和描述性分析方法,找出土耳其坚持的原因。这篇文章的结论是,土耳其坚持购买s-400的原因是美国通过CAATSA实施的胁迫性外交往往“三心二意”。美国“三心二意”的胁迫外交,使三种策略都无法实现成功有效的胁迫外交。首先,提出的要求和威胁没有很强的可信度和合法性。其次,土耳其政府在遵守美国要求方面缺乏紧迫性,这是导致这种持续存在的原因之一。最后,没有时间压力对于确保成功和有效的胁迫外交也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik
Masyarakat Kebudayaan dan Politik SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Integrated handling to overcome stunting in rural areas in East Java, Indonesia Agrarian conflict and split recognition: The middle way for recognition of the Mapur Bangka Tribe in Indonesia The dichotomy of electoral choice in fragmented societies: Prospects of 2023 Nigerian general elections The paradox of special autonomy: Why does wealth make Papua poor? Political confrontations and disagreements in the Nigerian Government’s COVID-19 response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1