A novel credit scoring system in financial institutions using artificial intelligence technology

Geethamanikanta Jakka, Amrutanshu Panigrahi, Abhilash Pati, M. N. Das, Jyotsnarani Tripathy
{"title":"A novel credit scoring system in financial institutions using artificial intelligence technology","authors":"Geethamanikanta Jakka, Amrutanshu Panigrahi, Abhilash Pati, M. N. Das, Jyotsnarani Tripathy","doi":"10.32629/jai.v6i2.824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to evaluate a person’s or a company’s creditworthiness, financial institutions must use credit scoring. Traditional credit scoring algorithms frequently rely on manual and rule-based methods, which can be tedious and inaccurate. Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) technology have opened up possibilities for creating more reliable and effective credit rating systems. The data are pre-processed, including scaling using the 0–1 normalization method and resolving missing values by imputation. Information gain (IG), gain ratio (GR), and chi-square are three feature selection methodologies covered in the study. While GR normalizes IG by dividing it by the total entropy of the feature, IG quantifies the reduction in total entropy by adding a new feature. Based on chi-squared statistics, the most vital traits are determined using chi-square. This research employs different ML models to develop a hybrid model for credit score prediction. The ML algorithms support vector machine (SVM), neural networks (NNs), decision trees (DTs), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR) classifiers are employed here for experiments along with IG, GR, and chi-square feature selection methodologies for credit prediction over Australian and German datasets. The study offers an understanding of the decision-making process for informative characteristics and the functionality of machine learning (ML) in credit prediction tasks. The empirical analysis shows that in the case of the German dataset, the DT with GR feature selection and hyperparameter optimization outperforms SVM and NN with an accuracy of 99.78%. For the Australian dataset, SVM with GR feature selection outperforms NN and DT with an accuracy of 99.98%.","PeriodicalId":70721,"journal":{"name":"自主智能(英文)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"自主智能(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v6i2.824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In order to evaluate a person’s or a company’s creditworthiness, financial institutions must use credit scoring. Traditional credit scoring algorithms frequently rely on manual and rule-based methods, which can be tedious and inaccurate. Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) technology have opened up possibilities for creating more reliable and effective credit rating systems. The data are pre-processed, including scaling using the 0–1 normalization method and resolving missing values by imputation. Information gain (IG), gain ratio (GR), and chi-square are three feature selection methodologies covered in the study. While GR normalizes IG by dividing it by the total entropy of the feature, IG quantifies the reduction in total entropy by adding a new feature. Based on chi-squared statistics, the most vital traits are determined using chi-square. This research employs different ML models to develop a hybrid model for credit score prediction. The ML algorithms support vector machine (SVM), neural networks (NNs), decision trees (DTs), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR) classifiers are employed here for experiments along with IG, GR, and chi-square feature selection methodologies for credit prediction over Australian and German datasets. The study offers an understanding of the decision-making process for informative characteristics and the functionality of machine learning (ML) in credit prediction tasks. The empirical analysis shows that in the case of the German dataset, the DT with GR feature selection and hyperparameter optimization outperforms SVM and NN with an accuracy of 99.78%. For the Australian dataset, SVM with GR feature selection outperforms NN and DT with an accuracy of 99.98%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种基于人工智能技术的金融机构信用评分系统
为了评估一个人或一家公司的信誉,金融机构必须使用信用评分。传统的信用评分算法经常依赖于手动和基于规则的方法,这可能是乏味和不准确的。人工智能技术的最新发展为创建更可靠、更有效的信用评级系统开辟了可能性。数据经过预处理,包括使用0–1归一化方法进行缩放和通过插补解决缺失值。信息增益(IG)、增益比(GR)和卡方是本研究涵盖的三种特征选择方法。GR通过将IG除以特征的总熵来归一化IG,而IG通过添加新特征来量化总熵的减少。基于卡方统计,最重要的特征是使用卡方来确定的。本研究采用不同的ML模型来开发信用评分预测的混合模型。ML算法支持向量机(SVM)、神经网络(NNs)、决策树(DTs)、随机森林(RF)和逻辑回归(LR)分类器与IG、GR和卡方特征选择方法一起用于澳大利亚和德国数据集上的信用预测实验。该研究提供了对信息特征的决策过程以及机器学习(ML)在信用预测任务中的功能的理解。实证分析表明,在德国数据集的情况下,具有GR特征选择和超参数优化的DT优于SVM和NN,准确率为99.78%。在澳大利亚数据集,带有GR特征选择的SVM优于NN和DT,准确率达99.98%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Conditioning and monitoring of grinding wheels: A state-of-the-art review Design and implementation of secured file delivery protocol using enhanced elliptic curve cryptography for class I and class II transactions An improved fuzzy c-means-raindrop optimizer for brain magnetic resonance image segmentation Key management and access control based on combination of cipher text-policy attribute-based encryption with Proxy Re-Encryption for cloud data Novel scientific design of hybrid opposition based—Chaotic little golden-mantled flying fox, White-winged chough search optimization algorithm for real power loss reduction and voltage stability expansion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1