Re-discussing the content of the prescription rights of midwives under certain circumstances using the Delphi method

Shi-Fan Han , Rui-Fang Zhu , Jin-Lian Cheng , Xiao-Ding Yue
{"title":"Re-discussing the content of the prescription rights of midwives under certain circumstances using the Delphi method","authors":"Shi-Fan Han ,&nbsp;Rui-Fang Zhu ,&nbsp;Jin-Lian Cheng ,&nbsp;Xiao-Ding Yue","doi":"10.1016/j.cnre.2017.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study sought to investigate the content of the prescription rights and the prescription types of midwives under certain circumstances in China.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Delphi method was used to consult 18 nursing experts and 14 medical experts. A total of 30 experts finished the consulting. The reliability of the expert opinions was analyzed to determine the specific situations in which midwives may write prescriptions, the content of the prescription rights and the prescription types.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In six specific circumstances (uterine contraction fatigue, uterine contractions that are too strong, postpartum hemorrhage, premature rupture of the membranes, normal delivery and neonatal asphyxia), midwives have the right to prescribe and administer medication, including 20 drugs and 13 auxiliary examinations. Of these drugs and examinations, 51.5% of the drugs and adjuvant examination prescriptions tend to be independent prescriptions, 30.3% tend to be protocol prescriptions, and 18.2% are similar to both types.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The midwives should be granted some prescription rights to enhance their autonomy and the professionalism of midwifery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":57172,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cnre.2017.07.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095771817300610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective

This study sought to investigate the content of the prescription rights and the prescription types of midwives under certain circumstances in China.

Methods

The Delphi method was used to consult 18 nursing experts and 14 medical experts. A total of 30 experts finished the consulting. The reliability of the expert opinions was analyzed to determine the specific situations in which midwives may write prescriptions, the content of the prescription rights and the prescription types.

Results

In six specific circumstances (uterine contraction fatigue, uterine contractions that are too strong, postpartum hemorrhage, premature rupture of the membranes, normal delivery and neonatal asphyxia), midwives have the right to prescribe and administer medication, including 20 drugs and 13 auxiliary examinations. Of these drugs and examinations, 51.5% of the drugs and adjuvant examination prescriptions tend to be independent prescriptions, 30.3% tend to be protocol prescriptions, and 18.2% are similar to both types.

Conclusions

The midwives should be granted some prescription rights to enhance their autonomy and the professionalism of midwifery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用德尔菲法重新探讨特定情况下助产士处方权的内容
目的了解中国特定情况下助产士处方权的内容及处方种类。方法采用德尔菲法对18名护理专家和14名医学专家进行咨询。共有30名专家完成了咨询工作。对专家意见的信度进行分析,确定助产士开处方的具体情况、处方权的内容和处方种类。结果在子宫收缩疲劳、子宫收缩过猛、产后出血、胎膜早破、分娩正常、新生儿窒息等6种特殊情况下,助产士有权开药,包括20种药物和13种辅助检查。在这些药物和检查中,51.5%的药物和辅助检查处方倾向于独立处方,30.3%倾向于方案处方,18.2%两者相似。结论应赋予助产士一定的处方权,以增强助产士的自主性和专业性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
期刊最新文献
医院新型冠状病毒感染疑似病例标准化 转运流程的制定及应用 Leadership theory in clinical practice A study on clinical nursing research trends and hotspots based on bibliometric analysis Perceived health-related stigma among patients with breast cancer Cultural barriers lead to inequitable healthcare access for aboriginal Australians and Torres Strait Islanders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1