The monolingual approach in American linguistic fieldwork

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Historiographia Linguistica Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.1075/HL.00078.THO
Margaret Thomas
{"title":"The monolingual approach in American linguistic fieldwork","authors":"Margaret Thomas","doi":"10.1075/HL.00078.THO","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the first decades of the 20th century, fieldwork — collection of language data through direct interaction with\n a native speaker — was foundational to American linguistics. After a mid-century period of neglect, fieldwork has recently been\n revived as a means to address the increasing rate of language endangerment worldwide. Twenty-first century American fieldwork\n inherits some, but not all, of the traits of earlier fieldwork. This article examines the history of one controversial issue,\n whether a field worker should adopt a monolingual approach, learning and using the target language as a medium of exchange with\n native speakers, as opposed to relying on interpreters or a lingua franca. Although the monolingual approach is not widely\n practiced, modern proponents argue strongly for its value. The method has been popularized though ‘monolingual demonstrations’ to\n audiences of linguists, which, curiously, are not wholly consistent with the character of 21st-century fieldwork.","PeriodicalId":51928,"journal":{"name":"Historiographia Linguistica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historiographia Linguistica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/HL.00078.THO","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the first decades of the 20th century, fieldwork — collection of language data through direct interaction with a native speaker — was foundational to American linguistics. After a mid-century period of neglect, fieldwork has recently been revived as a means to address the increasing rate of language endangerment worldwide. Twenty-first century American fieldwork inherits some, but not all, of the traits of earlier fieldwork. This article examines the history of one controversial issue, whether a field worker should adopt a monolingual approach, learning and using the target language as a medium of exchange with native speakers, as opposed to relying on interpreters or a lingua franca. Although the monolingual approach is not widely practiced, modern proponents argue strongly for its value. The method has been popularized though ‘monolingual demonstrations’ to audiences of linguists, which, curiously, are not wholly consistent with the character of 21st-century fieldwork.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国语言学田野调查中的单语方法
在20世纪的前几十年,田野调查——通过与母语人士的直接互动收集语言数据——是美国语言学的基础。在经历了一段世纪中期的忽视期后,田野调查最近重新成为解决全球日益增长的语言危害率的一种手段。21世纪的美国田野调查继承了早期田野调查的一些但不是全部特征。本文探讨了一个有争议的问题的历史,即现场工作人员是否应该采用单语方法,学习和使用目标语言作为与母语人士交流的媒介,而不是依赖口译员或通用语。尽管单语方法并没有得到广泛的实践,但现代支持者强烈支持它的价值。这种方法已经通过“单语演示”向语言学家普及,奇怪的是,这并不完全符合21世纪田野调查的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Historiographia Linguistica (HL) serves the ever growing community of scholars interested in the history of the sciences concerned with language such as linguistics, philology, anthropology, sociology, pedagogy, psychology, neurology, and other disciplines. Central objectives of HL are the critical presentation of the origin and development of particular ideas, concepts, methods, schools of thought or trends, and the discussion of the methodological and philosophical foundations of a historiography of the language sciences, including its relationship with the history and philosophy of science. HL is published in 3 issues per year of about 450 pages altogether.
期刊最新文献
Strukturalismus und kein Ende?* Missionary linguistics in the East Indies in the seventeenth century Review of Householder, Saporta & Adams (2022): Problems in Lexicography Compte rendu de Rey (2023): Léonard de Vinci, génie des langues Review of De Palo & Gensini (2022): With Saussure, beyond Saussure. Between linguistics and philosophy of language
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1