Las prácticas formativas en Ciencias Sociales: una comparación entre el Trabajo Social y la Sociología

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives-REALIA Pub Date : 2022-07-15 DOI:10.7203/realia.29.23735
Roser Manzanera Ruíz, María del Valle Medina Rodríguez
{"title":"Las prácticas formativas en Ciencias Sociales: una comparación entre el Trabajo Social y la Sociología","authors":"Roser Manzanera Ruíz, María del Valle Medina Rodríguez","doi":"10.7203/realia.29.23735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professional practice in Social Work is not new. In southern Spain, for example, such practice dates back to the 1960s. In 2010, studies in this discipline were incorporated into the university education system. This article has three main objectives: (1) to determine which skills students of social work and sociology acquire when taking part in practical and professional courses; (2) to investigate how formative practice contributes to critical professional practice in both these dis- ciplines and how it impacts problem solving in social work; and (3) to identify the strengths and weaknesses of professional practice in social work and analyse their causes and consequences. To achieve these objectives we used a qualitative methodology in which we analysed secondary sour- ces and conducted semi-structured interviews with participants involved in formative practices on each degree. Our results show that the Bologna Plan has strengthened knowledge areas such as so- cial work more than others with greater academic traditions (such as Sociology) by expanding their training practices, providing greater critical perspectives, and promoting better integration between theory and practice. Weaknesses are also observed, however. These include an insufficient number of teaching centres and a disconnection between supervision groups that has led to differences in the training students receive.","PeriodicalId":40166,"journal":{"name":"Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives-REALIA","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives-REALIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.29.23735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Professional practice in Social Work is not new. In southern Spain, for example, such practice dates back to the 1960s. In 2010, studies in this discipline were incorporated into the university education system. This article has three main objectives: (1) to determine which skills students of social work and sociology acquire when taking part in practical and professional courses; (2) to investigate how formative practice contributes to critical professional practice in both these dis- ciplines and how it impacts problem solving in social work; and (3) to identify the strengths and weaknesses of professional practice in social work and analyse their causes and consequences. To achieve these objectives we used a qualitative methodology in which we analysed secondary sour- ces and conducted semi-structured interviews with participants involved in formative practices on each degree. Our results show that the Bologna Plan has strengthened knowledge areas such as so- cial work more than others with greater academic traditions (such as Sociology) by expanding their training practices, providing greater critical perspectives, and promoting better integration between theory and practice. Weaknesses are also observed, however. These include an insufficient number of teaching centres and a disconnection between supervision groups that has led to differences in the training students receive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会科学的形成实践:社会工作与社会学的比较
社会工作的专业实践并不新鲜。例如,在西班牙南部,这种做法可以追溯到20世纪60年代。2010年,该学科被纳入大学教育体系。本文有三个主要目的:(1)确定社会工作和社会学学生在参加实践和专业课程时获得哪些技能;(2)研究形成性实践如何促进这两个学科的关键专业实践,以及它如何影响社会工作中的问题解决;(3)识别社会工作专业实践的优势和劣势,并分析其原因和后果。为了实现这些目标,我们使用了一种定性的方法,在这种方法中,我们分析了二级课程,并对参与每个学位形成实践的参与者进行了半结构化的访谈。我们的研究结果表明,博洛尼亚计划通过扩大培训实践,提供更多的批判性观点,并促进理论与实践的更好结合,加强了社会工作等知识领域,而不是其他具有更大学术传统的领域(如社会学)。然而,弱点也被观察到。这些问题包括教学中心数量不足,监督小组之间脱节,导致学生接受的培训存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reducing Underachievement and Promoting Critical Thinking Skills in Computer Studies Through a Culturally Sensitive Instructional Method El tratamiento de las lenguas adicionales en el Proyecto Lingüístico de Centro: TILC y AICLE a revisión en el contexto valenciano Learner analytics: Hindsight evaluation at course-level Exploring the Positive Experiences of Senior High School Teachers in Teaching the Sports Track during the K-12 Transition Years in Southern Philippines Implicación y afectividad en el ejercicio profesional del Trabajo Social y la Educación Social
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1