Efficacy of alginate and chickpea protein polymeric matrices in encapsulating curcumin for improved stability, sustained release and bioaccessibility

IF 4.6 Q1 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Food Hydrocolloids for Health Pub Date : 2023-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.fhfh.2023.100119
I. Farrah Shakoor , Geethi K. Pamunuwa , D. Nedra Karunaratne
{"title":"Efficacy of alginate and chickpea protein polymeric matrices in encapsulating curcumin for improved stability, sustained release and bioaccessibility","authors":"I. Farrah Shakoor ,&nbsp;Geethi K. Pamunuwa ,&nbsp;D. Nedra Karunaratne","doi":"10.1016/j.fhfh.2023.100119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study compares the ubiquitously used alginate with seldom used chickpea protein as matrices for encapsulating curcumin, in terms of stability, <em>in vitro</em> release and bioaccessibility. Alginate and chickpea protein particles prepared via ionic gelation and isoelectric precipitation methods, respectively, were in the submicron range showing high encapsulation efficiencies of above 90%. Encapsulated particles stored in dark refrigerated conditions displayed greater stability of curcumin. <em>In vitro</em> release of curcumin from both encapsulated particles exhibited pH-dependent slow controlled release. However, alginate particles were more promising due to a protective role performed at gastric pH. The release profiles of curcumin from alginate and chickpea protein particles were best described by First order and Weibull models at pH 2 respectively, while those were well described by Higuchi and Zero order models at pH 6.8 respectively. Accordingly, release of curcumin from both encapsulated particles displayed diffusional controlled release at pH 2 while that from both particles showed diffusion-swelling controlled release at pH 6.8. Bioaccessibility of curcumin from both matrices after intestinal digestion was around 50% while that of free curcumin was approximately 18%. Overall, results point to alginate having an advantage over the chickpea protein matrix for safe efficacious oral delivery of curcumin. Thus, encapsulation of curcumin in alginate may be a promising method for the engineering of curcumin incorporated food with enhanced properties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12385,"journal":{"name":"Food Hydrocolloids for Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Hydrocolloids for Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667025923000055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The present study compares the ubiquitously used alginate with seldom used chickpea protein as matrices for encapsulating curcumin, in terms of stability, in vitro release and bioaccessibility. Alginate and chickpea protein particles prepared via ionic gelation and isoelectric precipitation methods, respectively, were in the submicron range showing high encapsulation efficiencies of above 90%. Encapsulated particles stored in dark refrigerated conditions displayed greater stability of curcumin. In vitro release of curcumin from both encapsulated particles exhibited pH-dependent slow controlled release. However, alginate particles were more promising due to a protective role performed at gastric pH. The release profiles of curcumin from alginate and chickpea protein particles were best described by First order and Weibull models at pH 2 respectively, while those were well described by Higuchi and Zero order models at pH 6.8 respectively. Accordingly, release of curcumin from both encapsulated particles displayed diffusional controlled release at pH 2 while that from both particles showed diffusion-swelling controlled release at pH 6.8. Bioaccessibility of curcumin from both matrices after intestinal digestion was around 50% while that of free curcumin was approximately 18%. Overall, results point to alginate having an advantage over the chickpea protein matrix for safe efficacious oral delivery of curcumin. Thus, encapsulation of curcumin in alginate may be a promising method for the engineering of curcumin incorporated food with enhanced properties.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海藻酸盐和鹰嘴豆蛋白聚合物基质包封姜黄素提高稳定性、缓释性和生物可及性的效果
本研究比较了普遍使用的海藻酸盐和很少使用的鹰嘴豆蛋白作为包封姜黄素的基质,从稳定性、体外释放度和生物可及性等方面进行了比较。离子凝胶法和等电沉淀法制备的海藻酸盐和鹰嘴豆蛋白颗粒在亚微米范围内,包封效率高达90%以上。在黑暗冷藏条件下储存的包封颗粒显示出更大的姜黄素稳定性。姜黄素的体外释放表现为ph依赖性慢控释。海藻酸盐和鹰嘴豆蛋白颗粒在pH值为2时的一阶和Weibull模型最能描述姜黄素的释放曲线,而在pH值为6.8时,则分别用Higuchi和零阶模型描述。因此,在pH值为2时,两种包封颗粒的姜黄素释放均表现为扩散控制释放;在pH值为6.8时,两种包封颗粒的姜黄素释放均表现为扩散-膨胀控制释放。两种基质的姜黄素经肠道消化后的生物可及性约为50%,而游离姜黄素的生物可及性约为18%。总的来说,结果表明海藻酸盐比鹰嘴豆蛋白基质具有安全有效的口服姜黄素的优势。因此,将姜黄素包埋在海藻酸盐中可能是一种很有前途的姜黄素食品工程方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
61 days
期刊最新文献
Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from mulberry leaf through hot melt extrusion: Enhanced antioxidant, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, and anticancer properties Silkworm pupae protein-based film incorporated with Catharanthus roseus leaf extract-based nanoparticles enhanced the lipid stability and microbial quality of cheddar cheese Re-processing of pharmaceutical herb residues using isolated probiotics from plant sources and their beneficial effects on diarrhea Investigating next-generation edible packaging: Protein-based films and coatings for delivering active compounds Recent advances on antimicrobial peptide and polysaccharide hydrogels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1