Aboriginal heritage as ecological proxy in south-eastern Australia: a Barapa wetland village

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Australasian Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2020-09-30 DOI:10.1080/14486563.2020.1821400
C. Pardoe, Dan Hutton
{"title":"Aboriginal heritage as ecological proxy in south-eastern Australia: a Barapa wetland village","authors":"C. Pardoe, Dan Hutton","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2020.1821400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Aboriginal archaeology has a central role to play among the myriad government agencies and professional disciplines involved in land and water management of the Murray River Basin in south-eastern Australia. In this study, we examine managed water flows against the archaeological record which provides secure evidence of how people lived at the Murray River floodplain wetlands before European colonisation. Seasonal residential patterns and economic activities of large populations have been reconstructed using archaeological, environmental, and hydrological information. The result is a picture of people living in large groupings – villages and hamlets – around water bodies that we suggest are ecological ‘hot spots’ within the forest. In identifying the preferred locations of village sites, we present the case for modification of environmental water delivery from large area forest flooding to targeted smaller water bodies that form ecological hot spots throughout the river floodplain landscape. Traditional Aboriginal land use in the form of the distribution of Aboriginal sites can act as an environmental proxy to inform heritage, land and water management policy and practices that seek to restore the health of the Murray River.","PeriodicalId":46081,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"28 1","pages":"17 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14486563.2020.1821400","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2020.1821400","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aboriginal archaeology has a central role to play among the myriad government agencies and professional disciplines involved in land and water management of the Murray River Basin in south-eastern Australia. In this study, we examine managed water flows against the archaeological record which provides secure evidence of how people lived at the Murray River floodplain wetlands before European colonisation. Seasonal residential patterns and economic activities of large populations have been reconstructed using archaeological, environmental, and hydrological information. The result is a picture of people living in large groupings – villages and hamlets – around water bodies that we suggest are ecological ‘hot spots’ within the forest. In identifying the preferred locations of village sites, we present the case for modification of environmental water delivery from large area forest flooding to targeted smaller water bodies that form ecological hot spots throughout the river floodplain landscape. Traditional Aboriginal land use in the form of the distribution of Aboriginal sites can act as an environmental proxy to inform heritage, land and water management policy and practices that seek to restore the health of the Murray River.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为澳大利亚东南部生态代理的土著遗产:巴拉帕湿地村
在澳大利亚东南部墨累河流域的土地和水资源管理中,土著考古学在众多政府机构和专业学科中扮演着核心角色。在这项研究中,我们检查了管理水流与考古记录,这些考古记录为欧洲殖民之前人们如何生活在墨利河洪泛区湿地提供了可靠的证据。利用考古、环境和水文信息重建了大量人口的季节性居住模式和经济活动。结果是一幅人们生活在大群体——村庄和小村庄——周围水体的照片,我们认为这些水体是森林内的生态“热点”。在确定村庄选址的首选位置时,我们提出了将环境水从大面积森林洪水输送到在整个河流洪泛区景观中形成生态热点的目标较小水体的案例。以分布土著遗址的形式使用传统的土著土地,可以作为一种环境代理,为遗产、土地和水管理政策和做法提供信息,以期恢复墨累河的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Bioanalytical tools in water quality assessment (2nd ed.) Bioanalytical tools in water quality assessment (2nd ed.) , by Beate Escher, Peta Neale, and Frederic Leusch, London, UK, IWA Publishing, 2021, 462 pp., £115 (paperback), ISBN: 9781789061970 Farm dam accounting for healthy and safe agricultural catchments A property rights schema for cultural flows in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia How environmental beliefs influence the acceptance of reallocating government budgets to improving coastal water quality: a hybrid choice model Activating electricity system demand response for commercial and industrial organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1