Pub Date : 2023-11-30DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2023.2280256
Joanne L. Tingey-Holyoak, John D. Pisaniello
{"title":"Farm dam accounting for healthy and safe agricultural catchments","authors":"Joanne L. Tingey-Holyoak, John D. Pisaniello","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2023.2280256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2023.2280256","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46081,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139204037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-27DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2023.2281562
Siobhan Davies, Graham R. Marshall, Malcolm J. Ridges
{"title":"A property rights schema for cultural flows in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia","authors":"Siobhan Davies, Graham R. Marshall, Malcolm J. Ridges","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2023.2281562","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2023.2281562","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46081,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139233135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-12DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2023.2248090
Mark Tocock, Antonio Borriello, Dugald Tinch, John M. Rose, Darla Hatton MacDonald
{"title":"How environmental beliefs influence the acceptance of reallocating government budgets to improving coastal water quality: a hybrid choice model","authors":"Mark Tocock, Antonio Borriello, Dugald Tinch, John M. Rose, Darla Hatton MacDonald","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2023.2248090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2023.2248090","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46081,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135878665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-15DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2023.2242317
N. Lashmar, B. Wade, L. Molyneaux, P. Ashworth
{"title":"Activating electricity system demand response for commercial and industrial organisations","authors":"N. Lashmar, B. Wade, L. Molyneaux, P. Ashworth","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2023.2242317","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2023.2242317","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46081,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43499794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-04DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2023.2238662
Sara Shawky, S. Rundle-Thiele, Patricia David
{"title":"What enables and prevents sugarcane growing practice change? A review of publicly available sources for practice change projects","authors":"Sara Shawky, S. Rundle-Thiele, Patricia David","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2023.2238662","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2023.2238662","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46081,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46281453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-03DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2023.2238666
A. Tung, K. Baird
{"title":"The role of technological innovation in responding to environmental concerns","authors":"A. Tung, K. Baird","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2023.2238666","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2023.2238666","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46081,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41704970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2023.2215728
Lucy Dickie, Fabien Medvecky
ABSTRACT Predator Free 2050 (PF2050) is an ambitious goal that aims to remove three types of invasive mammals from New Zealand by 2050. It will require a significant amount of funding, research, and support. Young adults will have an important role to play for this programme to be successful. Therefore, understanding the awareness and attitudes of young adults towards PF2050, and predator control, is an essential consideration. A survey of 1479 18- to 24-year-olds was conducted in 2017. The results showed that a higher percentage of young adults than members of the broader public view the small, introduced mammals as threats to New Zealand’s environment. Furthermore, this study highlights support for the control of feral, stray, and domestic cats. More focused research on attitudes towards cats is recommended to gauge which control methods are approved of by young adults. Indeed, methods appear to be a key factor to young adults supporting PF2050. The aerial distribution of poison was largely viewed negatively, and moderate concern was expressed about the targeted animal’s welfare. Interestingly, young adults appeared to be open to the use of gene editing and gene drive, although they expressed caution. Targeted communication towards young adults on toxins and genetic methods is recommended.
{"title":"The attitudes of young adults towards mammalian predator control and Predator Free 2050 in Aotearoa New Zealand","authors":"Lucy Dickie, Fabien Medvecky","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2023.2215728","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2023.2215728","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Predator Free 2050 (PF2050) is an ambitious goal that aims to remove three types of invasive mammals from New Zealand by 2050. It will require a significant amount of funding, research, and support. Young adults will have an important role to play for this programme to be successful. Therefore, understanding the awareness and attitudes of young adults towards PF2050, and predator control, is an essential consideration. A survey of 1479 18- to 24-year-olds was conducted in 2017. The results showed that a higher percentage of young adults than members of the broader public view the small, introduced mammals as threats to New Zealand’s environment. Furthermore, this study highlights support for the control of feral, stray, and domestic cats. More focused research on attitudes towards cats is recommended to gauge which control methods are approved of by young adults. Indeed, methods appear to be a key factor to young adults supporting PF2050. The aerial distribution of poison was largely viewed negatively, and moderate concern was expressed about the targeted animal’s welfare. Interestingly, young adults appeared to be open to the use of gene editing and gene drive, although they expressed caution. Targeted communication towards young adults on toxins and genetic methods is recommended.","PeriodicalId":46081,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"30 1","pages":"170 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49266247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2023.2221124
H. Lavery, H. Ross
Without archives, the long-term trends in environmental performance cannot be measured. In ecosystems that are particularly dynamic, as in Australia, this is especially so. Yet most environmentalists discard raw data once their interpretations of these are complete; at best, any records remain poorly accessible. Other environmental practitioners may accumulate a lifetime of valuable raw field data, which they or their successors will sadly discard at career end unless retention is suitably arranged. Strayer (1986) and other authorities overseas have emphasised that environmental history is crucial to modern environmental policy through its contribution to understanding the dynamics of the landscape. While palaeobotanical records, repeat photography, fire-scar histories from tree rings, climate records and other physical materials are used frequently, relatively few are available for wildlife population dynamics. In the period since World War II, much field information has been gathered in Australia with the aim of applying results to arrest any observed decline in our natural ecosystems. In more recent times, gathering ecological field data has become less affordable and less popular, and attempts to lodge any legacy at suitably interested agencies are disappointing. Already accounts are circulating about the disposal of data to landfill, although professionals are understandably reluctant to admit this. It is basic to the efforts of all those who collect or are interested in using data that stock is taken regularly of environmental historical records (i.e. databases) to ensure there is suitably sound information on which to measure trends. We argue that the historical data on which Australia’s management of ecosystems over time is based must not only be sound but also reliably available. Its selection and storage must be a deliberate, planned exercise. We illustrate from a set of field case studies which provide evidence of actions contributing to that end. Dredging is a prominent, long-term sphere of activity which has demonstrable environmental consequences in topography and in water pollution, for example in the shipping channels of ports and in the recreational areas of harbours, respectively. Dredging records could thus show deterioration of seabed form and vegetation and be useful to sailors, fishers and bathers. Since 1788, parts of Sydney Harbour (Port Jackson, Middle Harbour, Lane Cove River and Parramatta River) have been modified substantially by dredging. McLoughlin (1999) sought to develop solutions to current environmental crises through the historical record of the quality of the waterways of Sydney Harbour. She found that dredging records, dating back more than 140 years, have not provided an adequate record. Her conclusion was that, in New South Wales, environmental records ‘which document government policy, determination and action’, ‘which embody citizens’ legal rights and document information about their existence and identit
{"title":"Archives – an important requirement in environmental management","authors":"H. Lavery, H. Ross","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2023.2221124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2023.2221124","url":null,"abstract":"Without archives, the long-term trends in environmental performance cannot be measured. In ecosystems that are particularly dynamic, as in Australia, this is especially so. Yet most environmentalists discard raw data once their interpretations of these are complete; at best, any records remain poorly accessible. Other environmental practitioners may accumulate a lifetime of valuable raw field data, which they or their successors will sadly discard at career end unless retention is suitably arranged. Strayer (1986) and other authorities overseas have emphasised that environmental history is crucial to modern environmental policy through its contribution to understanding the dynamics of the landscape. While palaeobotanical records, repeat photography, fire-scar histories from tree rings, climate records and other physical materials are used frequently, relatively few are available for wildlife population dynamics. In the period since World War II, much field information has been gathered in Australia with the aim of applying results to arrest any observed decline in our natural ecosystems. In more recent times, gathering ecological field data has become less affordable and less popular, and attempts to lodge any legacy at suitably interested agencies are disappointing. Already accounts are circulating about the disposal of data to landfill, although professionals are understandably reluctant to admit this. It is basic to the efforts of all those who collect or are interested in using data that stock is taken regularly of environmental historical records (i.e. databases) to ensure there is suitably sound information on which to measure trends. We argue that the historical data on which Australia’s management of ecosystems over time is based must not only be sound but also reliably available. Its selection and storage must be a deliberate, planned exercise. We illustrate from a set of field case studies which provide evidence of actions contributing to that end. Dredging is a prominent, long-term sphere of activity which has demonstrable environmental consequences in topography and in water pollution, for example in the shipping channels of ports and in the recreational areas of harbours, respectively. Dredging records could thus show deterioration of seabed form and vegetation and be useful to sailors, fishers and bathers. Since 1788, parts of Sydney Harbour (Port Jackson, Middle Harbour, Lane Cove River and Parramatta River) have been modified substantially by dredging. McLoughlin (1999) sought to develop solutions to current environmental crises through the historical record of the quality of the waterways of Sydney Harbour. She found that dredging records, dating back more than 140 years, have not provided an adequate record. Her conclusion was that, in New South Wales, environmental records ‘which document government policy, determination and action’, ‘which embody citizens’ legal rights and document information about their existence and identit","PeriodicalId":46081,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"30 1","pages":"141 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47487416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2023.2217152
J. McDonald, Manon Simon
ABSTRACT Research into the best forms of conservation management or climate intervention is critically important, but carries its own risks of impacts. Unless research requires a legal permit, evaluation of whether the benefits of such research outweigh risks is left to research ethics processes. We ask whether the ethics processes governing outdoor research in Australia ensure that potential environmental impacts are addressed adequately. We examine how environmental considerations are incorporated into Australia’s research ethics governance framework 25 years after the Australian Science, Technology and Engineering Council issued national guidelines for the ethical conduct of environmental research. These guidelines have not been incorporated into national research ethics frameworks or institutional processes. Current ethics codes apply only partially to environmental research and no research institution has developed its own processes or body for considering the environmental impacts of research. The national guidelines are partially reflected in protected area permitting requirements, but these lack explicit mechanisms for ethical deliberation. We conclude that the national guidelines remain relevant today. We stop short of recommending new formal ethics requirements, but encourage researchers and research institutions to consider how the deliberative procedures and substantive principles reflected in the ASTEC Guidelines might be relevant to their work.
{"title":"Ethics requirements for environmental research","authors":"J. McDonald, Manon Simon","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2023.2217152","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2023.2217152","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research into the best forms of conservation management or climate intervention is critically important, but carries its own risks of impacts. Unless research requires a legal permit, evaluation of whether the benefits of such research outweigh risks is left to research ethics processes. We ask whether the ethics processes governing outdoor research in Australia ensure that potential environmental impacts are addressed adequately. We examine how environmental considerations are incorporated into Australia’s research ethics governance framework 25 years after the Australian Science, Technology and Engineering Council issued national guidelines for the ethical conduct of environmental research. These guidelines have not been incorporated into national research ethics frameworks or institutional processes. Current ethics codes apply only partially to environmental research and no research institution has developed its own processes or body for considering the environmental impacts of research. The national guidelines are partially reflected in protected area permitting requirements, but these lack explicit mechanisms for ethical deliberation. We conclude that the national guidelines remain relevant today. We stop short of recommending new formal ethics requirements, but encourage researchers and research institutions to consider how the deliberative procedures and substantive principles reflected in the ASTEC Guidelines might be relevant to their work.","PeriodicalId":46081,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"30 1","pages":"148 - 169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43060763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：