La autonomía privada en el caso del fideicomiso peruano

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW Revista de la Facultad de Derecho Pub Date : 2019-07-16 DOI:10.22187/RFD2019N47A7
Braulio Alexis Arias Villagómez
{"title":"La autonomía privada en el caso del fideicomiso peruano","authors":"Braulio Alexis Arias Villagómez","doi":"10.22187/RFD2019N47A7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Below, article 242 of the Ley General del Sistema Financiero y del Sistema de Seguros y Organica de la Superintendencia de Banca y Seguros (General Law of the Financial System and of the Insurance and Organic System of the Banking and Insurance Supervisor) is analyzed, which is the legal norm that regulates the Peruvian trust contract and it establishes the only people who can act as fiduciaries. \nThe premise of the study is based on the fact that such legal norm would be violating the principle of private autonomy since it limits the freedom to contract by not allowing the free choice of the trustor over the fiduciary, a fact that is exposed in the future of the study. In order to explain the problems, a notion about trust is provided and then the regulatory framework applicable to the trust in the Peruvian legal system is explained which leads to identify the legal standards that qualify the trust as a valid contract. \nAt the moment of reviewing the legal norms that serve to establish the trust contract as valid, the suitability of such is also analyzed. \nThe study aims to contribute to the regulation of the trust where the principle of contractual private autonomy recognized by the Peruvian Constitution is respected in article 2, subsection 14; providing congruence to the Peruvian legal system.","PeriodicalId":53805,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22187/RFD2019N47A7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Below, article 242 of the Ley General del Sistema Financiero y del Sistema de Seguros y Organica de la Superintendencia de Banca y Seguros (General Law of the Financial System and of the Insurance and Organic System of the Banking and Insurance Supervisor) is analyzed, which is the legal norm that regulates the Peruvian trust contract and it establishes the only people who can act as fiduciaries. The premise of the study is based on the fact that such legal norm would be violating the principle of private autonomy since it limits the freedom to contract by not allowing the free choice of the trustor over the fiduciary, a fact that is exposed in the future of the study. In order to explain the problems, a notion about trust is provided and then the regulatory framework applicable to the trust in the Peruvian legal system is explained which leads to identify the legal standards that qualify the trust as a valid contract. At the moment of reviewing the legal norms that serve to establish the trust contract as valid, the suitability of such is also analyzed. The study aims to contribute to the regulation of the trust where the principle of contractual private autonomy recognized by the Peruvian Constitution is respected in article 2, subsection 14; providing congruence to the Peruvian legal system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
秘鲁信托案中的私人自治
下文分析了Ley General del Sistema Financiero y del Siste马·de Seguros y Organica de la Supertendencia de Banca y Seguros(金融系统和保险的一般法律以及银行和保险监管机构的组织制度)第242条,这是规范秘鲁信托合同的法律规范,它规定了唯一可以作为受托人的人。本研究的前提是这样一个事实,即这种法律规范将违反私人自主权原则,因为它不允许委托人对受托人的自由选择,从而限制了合同自由,这一事实将在未来的研究中暴露出来。为了解释这些问题,提供了一个关于信托的概念,然后解释了秘鲁法律体系中适用于信托的监管框架,从而确定了将信托视为有效合同的法律标准。在对确立信托合同效力的法律规范进行审查的同时,也对其适用性进行了分析。该研究旨在促进对信托的监管,其中第2条第14款尊重《秘鲁宪法》承认的契约性私人自治原则;与秘鲁法律制度相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
El Acceso de la Administración Tributaria a la Información Bancaria en Honduras Estudio de la Figura del Holding, su desarrollo en Latinoamérica y presencia en Honduras Reflexiones en torno a la Proporcionalidad y Ponderación de Derechos Aplicados al Caso Artavia Murillo y otros (Fecundación In Vitro) Vs. Costa Rica Derechos Humanos: Coercibilidad de tratados, Educación, Estado de Derecho y Democracia RETROACTIVIDAD DE LA LEY PENAL MAS FAVORABLE (En Honduras una cuestión de justicia constitucional)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1