Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Romantic Relationship Stress Scale

IF 1 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Family Journal Pub Date : 2023-02-12 DOI:10.1177/10664807231154016
Steff Du Bois, Karolina Grotkowski, Arryn A. Guy, Erin Thomas, M. Chockalingam, T. Sher
{"title":"Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Romantic Relationship Stress Scale","authors":"Steff Du Bois, Karolina Grotkowski, Arryn A. Guy, Erin Thomas, M. Chockalingam, T. Sher","doi":"10.1177/10664807231154016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stress is inherent to romantic relationships. Current relationship scales measure individual stress, relationship conflict, and relationship happiness. However, no known empirically supported scale exists that comprehensively measures romantic relationship stress. We reviewed the extant theory, empirical findings, and measures within the broad category of relationship stress. Using this information, we created the Romantic Relationship Stress Scale (RRSS)—a three-part, 29-item measure. We administered the measure to married individuals (N = 296) in either a proximal or long-distance relationship, in the context of a larger study. An exploratory factor analysis was performed on RRSS responses, using principal axis factoring with an oblique rotation. A three-factor solution was derived, representing the factors of relational negativity, stressful relationship events, and relational positivity. These factors explained 67.7% of the variance in RRSS responses, and were correlated in the expected directions. The overall scale alpha was 0.93, and subscale alphas ranged from 0.65–0.91. The RRSS demonstrated convergent validity; scores were positively correlated to scores on a widely used measure of individual stress. The RRSS discriminated between those in proximal versus long-distance relationships. Overall, the RRSS appears to be psychometrically sound, and can be considered for use in both research and clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":47151,"journal":{"name":"Family Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807231154016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stress is inherent to romantic relationships. Current relationship scales measure individual stress, relationship conflict, and relationship happiness. However, no known empirically supported scale exists that comprehensively measures romantic relationship stress. We reviewed the extant theory, empirical findings, and measures within the broad category of relationship stress. Using this information, we created the Romantic Relationship Stress Scale (RRSS)—a three-part, 29-item measure. We administered the measure to married individuals (N = 296) in either a proximal or long-distance relationship, in the context of a larger study. An exploratory factor analysis was performed on RRSS responses, using principal axis factoring with an oblique rotation. A three-factor solution was derived, representing the factors of relational negativity, stressful relationship events, and relational positivity. These factors explained 67.7% of the variance in RRSS responses, and were correlated in the expected directions. The overall scale alpha was 0.93, and subscale alphas ranged from 0.65–0.91. The RRSS demonstrated convergent validity; scores were positively correlated to scores on a widely used measure of individual stress. The RRSS discriminated between those in proximal versus long-distance relationships. Overall, the RRSS appears to be psychometrically sound, and can be considered for use in both research and clinical settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
浪漫关系压力量表的探索性因素分析
压力是浪漫关系中固有的。目前的关系量表衡量的是个人压力、关系冲突和关系幸福。然而,目前还没有一个已知的经验支持的量表可以全面衡量恋爱关系的压力。我们回顾了现有的理论,实证研究结果,并在广义的关系压力的措施。利用这些信息,我们创建了浪漫关系压力量表(RRSS)——一个由三部分组成的29项测量。在一个更大的研究背景下,我们对已婚人士(N = 296)进行了测量,他们要么是近距离的,要么是远距离的。对RRSS响应进行探索性因子分析,使用倾斜旋转的主轴因子分解。导出了一个三因素解,分别代表关系负性、压力关系事件和关系积极因素。这些因素解释了RRSS反应中67.7%的方差,并在预期方向上相关。整体量表alpha为0.93,次量表alpha为0.65 ~ 0.91。rrs具有收敛效度;分数与广泛使用的个人压力测量分数呈正相关。RRSS区分了近距离关系和远距离关系。总的来说,RRSS在心理测量学上是合理的,可以考虑在研究和临床环境中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family Journal
Family Journal FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families is the official journal of the International Association of Marriage and Family Counselors (IAMFC). The purpose of the journal is to advance the theory, research, and practice of counseling with couples and families from a family systems perspective.
期刊最新文献
African American Women and Self-Esteem Expressive Arts and Family Counseling: An Interview With Dr. Cathy Malchiodi Teaching in the Age of AI/ChatGPT in Mental-Health-Related Fields A Pilot Study Examining the Effectiveness of Gottman Method Couples Therapy Over Treatment-as-Usual Approaches for Treating Couples Dealing with Infidelity The Impact of PTSD and Depression on Romantic Attachment Within Incarcerated Romantic Relationships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1