En defensa de un control republicano reflexivo de constitucionalidad. Un análisis comparativo de las propuestas de Tom Hickey y Richard Bellamy

Nicolás Emanuel Olivares
{"title":"En defensa de un control republicano reflexivo de constitucionalidad. Un análisis comparativo de las propuestas de Tom Hickey y Richard Bellamy","authors":"Nicolás Emanuel Olivares","doi":"10.19137/perspectivas-2023-v13n2a06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This paper focuses on the analysis of a complex and relevant political institution: constitutional review. Broadly speaking, its democratic legitimacy is evaluated from a normative philosophical perspective that matches with a contemporary republican approach. More precisely, it re-constructs the main representative republican concepts of Philip Pettit and comparatively analyzes the theoretical proposals of Richard Bellamy and Tom Hickey. Finally, four arguments are provided in defense of a possible alternative approach that commits the author to a reflexive republican conception and a system of multisituated constitutional review.","PeriodicalId":32970,"journal":{"name":"Perspectivas de las Ciencias Economicas y Juridicas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectivas de las Ciencias Economicas y Juridicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19137/perspectivas-2023-v13n2a06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: This paper focuses on the analysis of a complex and relevant political institution: constitutional review. Broadly speaking, its democratic legitimacy is evaluated from a normative philosophical perspective that matches with a contemporary republican approach. More precisely, it re-constructs the main representative republican concepts of Philip Pettit and comparatively analyzes the theoretical proposals of Richard Bellamy and Tom Hickey. Finally, four arguments are provided in defense of a possible alternative approach that commits the author to a reflexive republican conception and a system of multisituated constitutional review.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捍卫共和党对合宪性的反思性控制。汤姆·希基和理查德·贝拉米提案的比较分析
:本文重点分析了一个复杂而相关的政治制度:宪法审查。从广义上讲,它的民主合法性是从一个与当代共和主义方法相匹配的规范哲学角度来评估的。更确切地说,它重新构建了菲利普·佩蒂特的主要代表性共和党概念,并对理查德·贝拉米和汤姆·希基的理论建议进行了比较分析。最后,提供了四个论点来为一种可能的替代方法辩护,该方法使作者致力于反射性的共和概念和多层次宪法审查制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
En defensa de un control republicano reflexivo de constitucionalidad. Un análisis comparativo de las propuestas de Tom Hickey y Richard Bellamy Una controversia sobre el concepto de restricción externa Consejo de la Magistratura, reforma judicial feminista y acceso a la justicia Emociones y sesgos implícitos en el derecho. ¿Fenómenos similares? Factores clave en la retención del talento IT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1