Distance and Fieldwork in a Pandemic: How Not ‘Being there’ is Impacting Research on Japan

IF 0.4 Q3 AREA STUDIES Japanese Studies Pub Date : 2023-05-21 DOI:10.1080/10371397.2023.2214507
Jenny Hall
{"title":"Distance and Fieldwork in a Pandemic: How Not ‘Being there’ is Impacting Research on Japan","authors":"Jenny Hall","doi":"10.1080/10371397.2023.2214507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fieldwork is about 'being there' in the field to gather data. But what happens when researchers cannot visit the field? This article explores how Japan scholars have been dealing with the impact of COVID-19 on their research. It examines how restrictions on travel affect access to materials and engagement with fieldwork subjects, highlighting how the pandemic has created both obstructions and opportunities. The term 'fieldwork' usually involves ethnographic methods of data collection such as participant observation and interviews, but a wider interpretation encompasses visiting archives, libraries and museums. This article takes an inclusive definition of fieldwork to discover the impact of not 'being there' for scholars of Japan. Findings show that the inability to 'be there' has led more scholars to seek out material from online data repositories, archives and library collections. However, while the demand for online resources is increasing, materials are not always easily accessible to Japan scholars. The impact of travel restrictions on librarians has in turn affected the aggregation of materials, which has occasioned scholars to seek alternative methods of sourcing materials. Finally, through a case study, this article examines the methods scholars are adopting in digital ethnographic data collection to adjust to not 'being there'.","PeriodicalId":44839,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10371397.2023.2214507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Fieldwork is about 'being there' in the field to gather data. But what happens when researchers cannot visit the field? This article explores how Japan scholars have been dealing with the impact of COVID-19 on their research. It examines how restrictions on travel affect access to materials and engagement with fieldwork subjects, highlighting how the pandemic has created both obstructions and opportunities. The term 'fieldwork' usually involves ethnographic methods of data collection such as participant observation and interviews, but a wider interpretation encompasses visiting archives, libraries and museums. This article takes an inclusive definition of fieldwork to discover the impact of not 'being there' for scholars of Japan. Findings show that the inability to 'be there' has led more scholars to seek out material from online data repositories, archives and library collections. However, while the demand for online resources is increasing, materials are not always easily accessible to Japan scholars. The impact of travel restrictions on librarians has in turn affected the aggregation of materials, which has occasioned scholars to seek alternative methods of sourcing materials. Finally, through a case study, this article examines the methods scholars are adopting in digital ethnographic data collection to adjust to not 'being there'.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行中的距离和实地考察:不“在那里”如何影响对日本的研究
实地考察是指在实地收集数据。但是,当研究人员无法实地考察时会发生什么呢?本文探讨了日本学者如何应对新冠肺炎对他们研究的影响。报告审查了旅行限制如何影响获取材料和参与实地工作主题,强调了大流行如何既造成了障碍,也创造了机会。“田野调查”一词通常涉及数据收集的民族志方法,如参与者观察和访谈,但更广泛的解释包括参观档案馆、图书馆和博物馆。本文通过对田野工作的包容性定义,来发现“不在”对日本学者的影响。研究结果表明,无法“在那里”导致更多的学者从在线数据存储库、档案和图书馆馆藏中寻找资料。然而,尽管对在线资源的需求正在增加,但日本学者并不总是很容易获得这些材料。旅行限制对图书馆员的影响反过来又影响了资料的收集,这促使学者们寻求其他方法来获取资料。最后,通过一个案例研究,本文探讨了学者们在数字民族志数据收集中采用的方法,以适应“不在那里”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Studies
Japanese Studies AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Drift and Modernity: On Mid-Twentieth Century Japanese Intellectual Discourses Drugs and the Politics of Consumption in Japan Systemic Silencing: Activism, Memory and Sexual Violence in Indonesia A Review of Reframing Disability in Manga and Erotic Comics in Japan: An Introduction to Eromanga Sexual Abuse and Education in Japan: In the (Inter)national Shadows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1