The Effectiveness of Math Education on Self-esteem and Self-efficacy of Students With Math and Writing Learning Disorders and Normal Students Based on Mccarthy Model
Mohammad Shafaei, M. Bayrami, M. Narimani, Vakil Nazari
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Math Education on Self-esteem and Self-efficacy of Students With Math and Writing Learning Disorders and Normal Students Based on Mccarthy Model","authors":"Mohammad Shafaei, M. Bayrami, M. Narimani, Vakil Nazari","doi":"10.32598/jld.10.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of math education on self-esteem and self-efficacy of students with math learning disabilities, writing and normal students based on the McCarthy model. Methods: Because of the nature of this study, the method was quasi-experimental (pre-test-post-group test). The statistical population of the study included all sixth grade students with learning disabilities (math and writing) and non-learning disabilities in Ardabil in the academic year 2019-2020. Sampling procedure of this study was simple random sampling for students with special math and writing learning disabilities (20 people from each group) referring to the centers for learning disabilities in Ardabil and cluster sampling for normal students in Ardabil (40 people). Results: Data were collected using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and the Scherer General Self-Efficacy Scale in the pre-test and post-test stages in all four groups. The obtained data were analyzed by SPSS v. 24 software and covariance statistical method. The results of analysis of covariance showed that there was a difference between self-esteem and self-efficacy of experimental and control groups (P<0.05). In other words, the results showed that their mean scores were significantly higher in the experimental group than the self-esteem and self-efficacy of the experimental group. Conclusion: The results of this study can be used in educational settings to improve the status of its components (self-esteem and self-efficacy) of students with learning disabilities and normal.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jld.10.2.3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of math education on self-esteem and self-efficacy of students with math learning disabilities, writing and normal students based on the McCarthy model. Methods: Because of the nature of this study, the method was quasi-experimental (pre-test-post-group test). The statistical population of the study included all sixth grade students with learning disabilities (math and writing) and non-learning disabilities in Ardabil in the academic year 2019-2020. Sampling procedure of this study was simple random sampling for students with special math and writing learning disabilities (20 people from each group) referring to the centers for learning disabilities in Ardabil and cluster sampling for normal students in Ardabil (40 people). Results: Data were collected using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and the Scherer General Self-Efficacy Scale in the pre-test and post-test stages in all four groups. The obtained data were analyzed by SPSS v. 24 software and covariance statistical method. The results of analysis of covariance showed that there was a difference between self-esteem and self-efficacy of experimental and control groups (P<0.05). In other words, the results showed that their mean scores were significantly higher in the experimental group than the self-esteem and self-efficacy of the experimental group. Conclusion: The results of this study can be used in educational settings to improve the status of its components (self-esteem and self-efficacy) of students with learning disabilities and normal.
目的:基于McCarthy模型,比较数学教育对数学学习障碍学生、写作学生和正常学生自尊和自我效能的影响。方法:由于本研究的性质,采用准实验方法(组前-组后测试)。该研究的统计人群包括2019-2020学年阿达比尔所有有学习障碍(数学和写作)和非学习障碍的六年级学生。本研究采用简单随机抽样的方法,对阿达比尔市学习障碍中心的特殊数学和写作学习障碍学生(每组20人)进行抽样,对阿达比尔市正常学生(40人)进行整群抽样。结果:四组均采用Rosenberg自尊量表和Scherer一般自我效能量表收集测试前和测试后的数据。采用SPSS v. 24软件,采用协方差统计方法对所得数据进行分析。协方差分析结果显示,实验组与对照组自尊、自我效能感差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。也就是说,实验组的平均得分明显高于实验组的自尊和自我效能。结论:本研究结果可用于改善学习障碍学生和正常学生的自尊和自我效能感状况。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Learning Disabilities (JLD), a multidisciplinary, international publication, presents work and comments related to learning disabilities. Initial consideration of a manuscript depends upon (a) the relevance and usefulness of the content to the readership; (b) how the manuscript compares to other articles dealing with similar content on pertinent variables (e.g., sample size, research design, review of literature); (c) clarity of writing style; and (d) the author"s adherence to APA guidelines. Articles cover such fields as education, psychology, neurology, medicine, law, and counseling.