The Effectiveness of Math Education on Self-esteem and Self-efficacy of Students With Math and Writing Learning Disorders and Normal Students Based on Mccarthy Model

IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Learning Disabilities Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.32598/jld.10.2.3
Mohammad Shafaei, M. Bayrami, M. Narimani, Vakil Nazari
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Math Education on Self-esteem and Self-efficacy of Students With Math and Writing Learning Disorders and Normal Students Based on Mccarthy Model","authors":"Mohammad Shafaei, M. Bayrami, M. Narimani, Vakil Nazari","doi":"10.32598/jld.10.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of math education on self-esteem and self-efficacy of students with math learning disabilities, writing and normal students based on the McCarthy model. Methods: Because of the nature of this study, the method was quasi-experimental (pre-test-post-group test). The statistical population of the study included all sixth grade students with learning disabilities (math and writing) and non-learning disabilities in Ardabil in the academic year 2019-2020. Sampling procedure of this study was simple random sampling for students with special math and writing learning disabilities (20 people from each group) referring to the centers for learning disabilities in Ardabil and cluster sampling for normal students in Ardabil (40 people). Results: Data were collected using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and the Scherer General Self-Efficacy Scale in the pre-test and post-test stages in all four groups. The obtained data were analyzed by SPSS v. 24 software and covariance statistical method. The results of analysis of covariance showed that there was a difference between self-esteem and self-efficacy of experimental and control groups (P<0.05). In other words, the results showed that their mean scores were significantly higher in the experimental group than the self-esteem and self-efficacy of the experimental group. Conclusion: The results of this study can be used in educational settings to improve the status of its components (self-esteem and self-efficacy) of students with learning disabilities and normal.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jld.10.2.3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of math education on self-esteem and self-efficacy of students with math learning disabilities, writing and normal students based on the McCarthy model. Methods: Because of the nature of this study, the method was quasi-experimental (pre-test-post-group test). The statistical population of the study included all sixth grade students with learning disabilities (math and writing) and non-learning disabilities in Ardabil in the academic year 2019-2020. Sampling procedure of this study was simple random sampling for students with special math and writing learning disabilities (20 people from each group) referring to the centers for learning disabilities in Ardabil and cluster sampling for normal students in Ardabil (40 people). Results: Data were collected using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and the Scherer General Self-Efficacy Scale in the pre-test and post-test stages in all four groups. The obtained data were analyzed by SPSS v. 24 software and covariance statistical method. The results of analysis of covariance showed that there was a difference between self-esteem and self-efficacy of experimental and control groups (P<0.05). In other words, the results showed that their mean scores were significantly higher in the experimental group than the self-esteem and self-efficacy of the experimental group. Conclusion: The results of this study can be used in educational settings to improve the status of its components (self-esteem and self-efficacy) of students with learning disabilities and normal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于麦卡锡模型的数学教育对数学写作学习障碍学生和正常学生自尊和自我效能的影响
目的:基于McCarthy模型,比较数学教育对数学学习障碍学生、写作学生和正常学生自尊和自我效能的影响。方法:由于本研究的性质,采用准实验方法(组前-组后测试)。该研究的统计人群包括2019-2020学年阿达比尔所有有学习障碍(数学和写作)和非学习障碍的六年级学生。本研究采用简单随机抽样的方法,对阿达比尔市学习障碍中心的特殊数学和写作学习障碍学生(每组20人)进行抽样,对阿达比尔市正常学生(40人)进行整群抽样。结果:四组均采用Rosenberg自尊量表和Scherer一般自我效能量表收集测试前和测试后的数据。采用SPSS v. 24软件,采用协方差统计方法对所得数据进行分析。协方差分析结果显示,实验组与对照组自尊、自我效能感差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。也就是说,实验组的平均得分明显高于实验组的自尊和自我效能。结论:本研究结果可用于改善学习障碍学生和正常学生的自尊和自我效能感状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Learning Disabilities (JLD), a multidisciplinary, international publication, presents work and comments related to learning disabilities. Initial consideration of a manuscript depends upon (a) the relevance and usefulness of the content to the readership; (b) how the manuscript compares to other articles dealing with similar content on pertinent variables (e.g., sample size, research design, review of literature); (c) clarity of writing style; and (d) the author"s adherence to APA guidelines. Articles cover such fields as education, psychology, neurology, medicine, law, and counseling.
期刊最新文献
Derivational Morphology Training in French-Speaking 9- to 14- Year-Old Children and Adolescents With Developmental Dyslexia: Does It Improve Morphological Awareness, Reading, and Spelling Outcome Measures? Graph Out Loud: Pre-Service Teachers' Data Decisions and Interpretations of CBM Progress Graphs. What Environments Support Reading Growth Among Current Compared With Former Reading Intervention Recipients? A Multilevel Analysis of Students and Their Schools. Ongoing Teacher Support for Data-Based Individualization: A Meta-Analysis and Synthesis. The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: Clarifying the Relationship Between Free Appropriate Public Education and Least Restrictive Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1