Efficacy of breast augmentation using an external breast tissue expander for a shorter period while applying higher pressure: a preliminary study

Jeongseok Oh, Minseo Kim, Joon-Young Oh, C. Heo
{"title":"Efficacy of breast augmentation using an external breast tissue expander for a shorter period while applying higher pressure: a preliminary study","authors":"Jeongseok Oh, Minseo Kim, Joon-Young Oh, C. Heo","doi":"10.14730/aaps.2021.00332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Various types of external breast tissue expanders have been found to be effective for aesthetic breast augmentation. However, their use has been limited when compared with implant-based breast augmentation due to the burdensome nature of their application. This article reports the possibility that external breast tissue expanders may be applied safely and effectively with higher pressure and shorter application time.Methods The participants comprised patients who desired breast augmentation using the EVERA-RAPHA device between January 2020 and March 2020. A double-blinded prospective study was conducted on two groups of eight patients each, with either 60 mmHg or 100 mmHg of pressure applied. Standardized photographs were taken and blinded measurements of volume and circumference were made. The Mann-Whitney and paired t-tests were conducted.Results Sixteen patients were evaluated after 1 month of treatment. The women in groups 1 and 2 (60 mmHg and 100 mmHg, respectively) used EVERA-RAPHA for 15.400± 0.704 and 15.300±0.477 minutes per day, respectively. The mean volume increases in groups 1 and 2 were 39.000±42.526 cc and 27.700±20.260 cc, respectively. No patients dropped out of the study. All patients reported that the device was tolerable. Mild bruising was found in 62.5% of the patients in group 2.Conclusions Breast augmentation using external tissue expanders can be a safe, effective, and practical option. Pressures of 60 mmHg or 100 mmHg can be safely applied for a shorter duration. Larger studies are needed to further confirm our findings.","PeriodicalId":41514,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14730/aaps.2021.00332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Various types of external breast tissue expanders have been found to be effective for aesthetic breast augmentation. However, their use has been limited when compared with implant-based breast augmentation due to the burdensome nature of their application. This article reports the possibility that external breast tissue expanders may be applied safely and effectively with higher pressure and shorter application time.Methods The participants comprised patients who desired breast augmentation using the EVERA-RAPHA device between January 2020 and March 2020. A double-blinded prospective study was conducted on two groups of eight patients each, with either 60 mmHg or 100 mmHg of pressure applied. Standardized photographs were taken and blinded measurements of volume and circumference were made. The Mann-Whitney and paired t-tests were conducted.Results Sixteen patients were evaluated after 1 month of treatment. The women in groups 1 and 2 (60 mmHg and 100 mmHg, respectively) used EVERA-RAPHA for 15.400± 0.704 and 15.300±0.477 minutes per day, respectively. The mean volume increases in groups 1 and 2 were 39.000±42.526 cc and 27.700±20.260 cc, respectively. No patients dropped out of the study. All patients reported that the device was tolerable. Mild bruising was found in 62.5% of the patients in group 2.Conclusions Breast augmentation using external tissue expanders can be a safe, effective, and practical option. Pressures of 60 mmHg or 100 mmHg can be safely applied for a shorter duration. Larger studies are needed to further confirm our findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用外部乳房组织扩张器在较短时间内施加较高压力的隆胸效果:初步研究
背景已经发现各种类型的外部乳房组织扩张器对于美观的隆胸是有效的。然而,与基于植入物的隆胸相比,由于其应用的繁重性,其使用受到限制。本文报道了用更高的压力和更短的应用时间安全有效地应用外部乳房组织扩张器的可能性。方法参与者包括在2020年1月至2020年3月期间希望使用EVERA-RAPHA设备隆胸的患者。对两组患者进行双盲前瞻性研究,每组8名,施加60mmHg或100mmHg的压力。拍摄标准化照片,并对体积和周长进行盲法测量。进行Mann-Whitney和配对t检验。结果16例患者在治疗1个月后进行了评估。第1组和第2组(分别为60毫米汞柱和100毫米汞柱)的女性每天分别使用EVERA-RAPHA 15.400±0.704和15.300±0.477分钟。第1组和第2组的平均体积增加分别为39.000±42.526立方厘米和27.700±20.260立方厘米。没有患者退出研究。所有患者均报告该装置可耐受。在第2组中,62.5%的患者发现轻度瘀伤。结论使用外部组织扩张器隆乳是一种安全、有效和实用的选择。60毫米汞柱或100毫米汞柱的压力可以安全地应用较短的持续时间。需要更大规模的研究来进一步证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the effects of zinc oxide and zinc aspartic acid chelate on the performance of weaning pigs. Rabbit model for the study of nasal tip plasty: a comparative cephalometric analysis after rhinoplasty Modified cervicofacial transposition flap: a case report of aesthetic considerations after resection of a huge facial squamous cell carcinoma The eye of a maiden in “The Mad Painter” and upper blepharoplasty Subpectoral dissection using an ultrasonic energy device in prosthetic breast reconstruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1