A machine learning approach for resource mapping analysis of greenhouse gas removal technologies

IF 5.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy and climate change Pub Date : 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1016/j.egycc.2023.100112
Jude O. Asibor, Peter T. Clough, Seyed Ali Nabavi, Vasilije Manovic
{"title":"A machine learning approach for resource mapping analysis of greenhouse gas removal technologies","authors":"Jude O. Asibor,&nbsp;Peter T. Clough,&nbsp;Seyed Ali Nabavi,&nbsp;Vasilije Manovic","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2023.100112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, machine learning (ML) was applied to investigate the suitability of a location to deploy five greenhouse gas removal (GGR) methods within a global context, based on a location's bio-geophysical and techno-economic characteristics. The GGR methods considered are forestation, enhanced weathering (EW), direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS), bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and biochar. An unsupervised ML (hierarchical clustering) technique was applied to label the dataset. Seven supervised ML algorithms were applied in training and testing the labelled dataset with the k-Nearest neighbour (k-NN), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Random Forest algorithms having the highest performance accuracies of 96%, 98% and 100% respectively. A case study of Scotland's suitability to deploy these GGR methods was carried out with obtained results indicating a high correlation between the ML model results and information in the available literature. While the performance accuracy of the ML models was typically high (76 - 100%), an assessment of its decision-making logic (model interpretation) revealed some limitations regarding the impact of the various input variables on the outputs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100112"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278723000193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, machine learning (ML) was applied to investigate the suitability of a location to deploy five greenhouse gas removal (GGR) methods within a global context, based on a location's bio-geophysical and techno-economic characteristics. The GGR methods considered are forestation, enhanced weathering (EW), direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS), bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and biochar. An unsupervised ML (hierarchical clustering) technique was applied to label the dataset. Seven supervised ML algorithms were applied in training and testing the labelled dataset with the k-Nearest neighbour (k-NN), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Random Forest algorithms having the highest performance accuracies of 96%, 98% and 100% respectively. A case study of Scotland's suitability to deploy these GGR methods was carried out with obtained results indicating a high correlation between the ML model results and information in the available literature. While the performance accuracy of the ML models was typically high (76 - 100%), an assessment of its decision-making logic (model interpretation) revealed some limitations regarding the impact of the various input variables on the outputs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种用于温室气体去除技术资源映射分析的机器学习方法
在本研究中,基于一个地点的生物地球物理和技术经济特征,应用机器学习(ML)来调查一个地点在全球范围内部署五种温室气体去除(GGR)方法的适用性。考虑的GGR方法包括造林、增强风化(EW)、直接空气碳捕获和储存(DACCS)、碳捕获和储存的生物能源(BECCS)和生物炭。采用无监督ML(分层聚类)技术对数据集进行标记。7种有监督的机器学习算法应用于训练和测试标记数据集,其中k-近邻(k-NN)、人工神经网络(ANN)和随机森林算法的性能准确率最高,分别为96%、98%和100%。对苏格兰部署这些GGR方法的适用性进行了案例研究,获得的结果表明ML模型结果与现有文献中的信息之间存在高度相关性。虽然机器学习模型的性能精度通常很高(76 - 100%),但对其决策逻辑(模型解释)的评估显示,各种输入变量对输出的影响存在一些局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of decarbonisation challenges for the process industry in Sweden and Norway Green certificates for optimizing low-carbon hydrogen supply chain Cobalt-based molecular electrocatalyst-mediated green hydrogen generation: A potential pathway for decarbonising steel industry Advancing equitable value chains for the global hydrogen economy Health and air pollutant emission impacts of net zero CO2 by 2050 scenarios from the energy modeling forum 37 study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1