Investigation of Noise Level and Spatial Resolution of CT Images Filtered with a Selective Mean Filter and Its Comparison to an Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction

Q3 Health Professions Iranian Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2020-07-26 DOI:10.22038/IJMP.2020.48813.1786
Ummu Mar'atu Zahro, C. Anam, W. Budi, J. H. Saragih, P. Triadyaksa, D. A. Rukmana
{"title":"Investigation of Noise Level and Spatial Resolution of CT Images Filtered with a Selective Mean Filter and Its Comparison to an Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction","authors":"Ummu Mar'atu Zahro, C. Anam, W. Budi, J. H. Saragih, P. Triadyaksa, D. A. Rukmana","doi":"10.22038/IJMP.2020.48813.1786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate image qualities filtered by a selective mean filter (SMF) and its comparison to an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).Materials and Methods: A CT AAPM performance phantom was used for the assessment of basic image quality. The phantom was scanned by 128 Multiple Slices Computed Tomography. The tube current was varied (i.e. 50, 100, 150, and 200 mA). The images of a phantom were reconstructed by FBP followed by SMF and ASIR (20, 40, 60, 80, and 100%). The image quality assessment was in terms of noise level, noise power spectrum (NPS), and modulation transfer function (MTF). Result: It was found that SMF reduced noise level by more than 65% compared with FBP. The noise level and NPS of SMF was similar with ASIR 100%. The values of the MTF10 and MTF50 of the FBP, ASIR filter at any level, and SMF were comparable. The MTF10 values of FBP, ASIR 60% and SMF with 50 mA (low) tube current were 0.747 ± 0.03, 0.755 ± 0.02, and 0.748 ± 0.02 cycle/mm, respectively. While the MTF10 of FBP, ASIR 60%, and SMF with 200 mA (high) tube current were 0.730 ± 0.00, 0.741 ± 0.00, and 0.732 ± 0.00 cycles/mm, respectively. The MTF50 values of FBP, ASIR 60%, and SMF with low tube current were 0.408 ± 0.05, 0.428 ± 0.03, and 0.446 ± 0.04 cycle/mm, respectively. While the MTF50 values of FBP, ASIR 60%, and SMF with high tube current were 0.416 ± 0.00, 0.428 ± 0.01, and 0.416 ± 0.00 cycle/mm, respectively.Conclusions: These results indicated that the SMF algorithm reduces noise level without affecting the spatial resolution. The performance of the SMF in reducing noise is equivalent to the maximum level of ASIR strength i.e. ASIR 100%.","PeriodicalId":14613,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2020.48813.1786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate image qualities filtered by a selective mean filter (SMF) and its comparison to an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).Materials and Methods: A CT AAPM performance phantom was used for the assessment of basic image quality. The phantom was scanned by 128 Multiple Slices Computed Tomography. The tube current was varied (i.e. 50, 100, 150, and 200 mA). The images of a phantom were reconstructed by FBP followed by SMF and ASIR (20, 40, 60, 80, and 100%). The image quality assessment was in terms of noise level, noise power spectrum (NPS), and modulation transfer function (MTF). Result: It was found that SMF reduced noise level by more than 65% compared with FBP. The noise level and NPS of SMF was similar with ASIR 100%. The values of the MTF10 and MTF50 of the FBP, ASIR filter at any level, and SMF were comparable. The MTF10 values of FBP, ASIR 60% and SMF with 50 mA (low) tube current were 0.747 ± 0.03, 0.755 ± 0.02, and 0.748 ± 0.02 cycle/mm, respectively. While the MTF10 of FBP, ASIR 60%, and SMF with 200 mA (high) tube current were 0.730 ± 0.00, 0.741 ± 0.00, and 0.732 ± 0.00 cycles/mm, respectively. The MTF50 values of FBP, ASIR 60%, and SMF with low tube current were 0.408 ± 0.05, 0.428 ± 0.03, and 0.446 ± 0.04 cycle/mm, respectively. While the MTF50 values of FBP, ASIR 60%, and SMF with high tube current were 0.416 ± 0.00, 0.428 ± 0.01, and 0.416 ± 0.00 cycle/mm, respectively.Conclusions: These results indicated that the SMF algorithm reduces noise level without affecting the spatial resolution. The performance of the SMF in reducing noise is equivalent to the maximum level of ASIR strength i.e. ASIR 100%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性均值滤波器滤波CT图像的噪声水平和空间分辨率研究及其与自适应统计迭代重建的比较
目的:研究选择性平均滤波器(SMF)滤波后的图像质量,并将其与自适应统计迭代重建(ASIR)进行比较。材料与方法:采用CT AAPM性能模型评价基本图像质量。采用128多层计算机断层扫描术对幻体进行扫描。管电流变化(即50、100、150和200毫安)。采用FBP、SMF和ASIR(20%、40%、60%、80%和100%)重建幻像图像。图像质量评价指标包括噪声水平、噪声功率谱(NPS)和调制传递函数(MTF)。结果:与FBP相比,SMF可使噪声水平降低65%以上。SMF的噪声级和NPS与ASIR相似,均为100%。在任意水平上,FBP、ASIR滤波器和SMF的MTF10和MTF50值具有可比性。FBP、ASIR 60%和SMF在50 mA(低)管电流下的MTF10值分别为0.747±0.03、0.755±0.02和0.748±0.02 cycles /mm。而在200 mA(高)管电流下,FBP、ASIR 60%和SMF的MTF10分别为0.730±0.00、0.741±0.00和0.732±0.00 cycles/mm。低管电流下FBP、ASIR 60%和SMF的MTF50分别为0.408±0.05、0.428±0.03和0.446±0.04 cycles /mm。而高管电流下FBP、ASIR 60%和SMF的MTF50值分别为0.416±0.00、0.428±0.01和0.416±0.00 cycles /mm。结论:SMF算法在不影响空间分辨率的情况下降低了噪声水平。SMF在降噪方面的性能相当于ASIR强度的最大水平,即ASIR 100%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Journal of Medical Physics (IJMP) is the official scientific bimonthly publication of the Iranian Association of Medical Physicists. IJMP is an international and multidisciplinary journal, peer review, free of charge publication and open access. This journal devoted to publish Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Technical Notes, Editorial and Letters to the Editor in the field of “Medical Physics” involving both basic and clinical research. Submissions of manuscript from all countries are welcome and will be reviewed by at least two expert reviewers.
期刊最新文献
Secondary cancer risk after radiotherapy of seminoma stage one The effect of cobalt oxide nanoparticles on improving the quality of CT and PET scan medical imaging Scatter radiation absorbed dose distribution in coronary angiography: A measurement based study Evaluation of Low-Dose 3D skull CT images in craniosynostosis Left-sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy and Risk of Heart Diseases: with Considering Baseline Risk of Heart Diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1