Being (with) batman – entangled research relations in ethnographic research in early childhood education and care

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Ethnography and Education Pub Date : 2021-03-23 DOI:10.1080/17457823.2021.1903961
Christina Huf, Markus Kluge
{"title":"Being (with) batman – entangled research relations in ethnographic research in early childhood education and care","authors":"Christina Huf, Markus Kluge","doi":"10.1080/17457823.2021.1903961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper engages with the question of how ethnographers in the field of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) can respond to the ontological turn in the social studies of childhood. Against the background of ECEC’s deeply sedimented orientation towards the uniqueness of the individual child, the paper wishes to complicate the rationale of de-centring the child and childhood-research’s child-centredness. Building on ethnographic field notes from a nursery class in the Early Years Unit of an Infant School in England, the authors discuss how ethnographers become entangled into the phenomenon of child-centredness, and how this entanglement is central for ethnographers to become answerable and response-able to the field of ECEC. The paper suggests that Karen Barad’s concept of agential seperability offers possibilities to explore how the individual child is enacted in ECEC and to understand, how ECEC is entangled into performing and producing children’s need for education.","PeriodicalId":46203,"journal":{"name":"Ethnography and Education","volume":"16 1","pages":"248 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17457823.2021.1903961","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnography and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2021.1903961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper engages with the question of how ethnographers in the field of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) can respond to the ontological turn in the social studies of childhood. Against the background of ECEC’s deeply sedimented orientation towards the uniqueness of the individual child, the paper wishes to complicate the rationale of de-centring the child and childhood-research’s child-centredness. Building on ethnographic field notes from a nursery class in the Early Years Unit of an Infant School in England, the authors discuss how ethnographers become entangled into the phenomenon of child-centredness, and how this entanglement is central for ethnographers to become answerable and response-able to the field of ECEC. The paper suggests that Karen Barad’s concept of agential seperability offers possibilities to explore how the individual child is enacted in ECEC and to understand, how ECEC is entangled into performing and producing children’s need for education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幼儿教育与保育中民族志研究的纠缠研究关系
摘要本文探讨了幼儿教育与保育领域的民族志学者如何应对儿童社会研究中的本体论转向。在ECEC对儿童个体独特性的深刻定位的背景下,本文希望使儿童去中心化的理论基础和儿童研究的儿童中心性复杂化。基于英国一所幼儿学校早期单元幼儿园的民族志现场笔记,作者讨论了民族志学家如何陷入以儿童为中心的现象,以及这种纠缠是民族志学家对幼儿教育领域负责和回应的核心。本文认为,Karen Barad的代理可分离性概念为探索儿童个体如何在幼儿教育中发挥作用,以及理解幼儿教育如何纠缠于表现和产生儿童的教育需求提供了可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnography and Education
Ethnography and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Ethnography and Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing articles that illuminate educational practices through empirical methodologies, which prioritise the experiences and perspectives of those involved. The journal is open to a wide range of ethnographic research that emanates from the perspectives of sociology, linguistics, history, psychology and general educational studies as well as anthropology. The journal’s priority is to support ethnographic research that involves long-term engagement with those studied in order to understand their cultures, uses multiple methods of generating data, and recognises the centrality of the researcher in the research process. The journal welcomes substantive and methodological articles that seek to explicate and challenge the effects of educational policies and practices; interrogate and develop theories about educational structures, policies and experiences; highlight the agency of educational actors; and provide accounts of how the everyday practices of those engaged in education are instrumental in social reproduction.
期刊最新文献
Ethical dilemmas of translanguaging pedagogy in L2 and basic literacy education for adults: social justice and ethics of care Playing the ‘pibe chorro’ game: masculine skills and legitimate peripheral participation in street culture ‘What’s he writing in there?’ Reciprocal field relations and relational curiosity in ethnographies of education Student voices in creative teaching practices with digital media: a meta-ethnographic research Is there room for interculturality? Indigenous youth in Peruvian private universities and the scholarship programme Beca 18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1