Problems of Justice in Legal Protection Efforts against Banks as Separatist Creditors related to Execution of Collateral Tied with Mortgage Rights on Bankrupt Debtor's Assets

SASI Pub Date : 2022-10-13 DOI:10.47268/sasi.v28i3.1028
Ilham Soetansah, Joni Emirzon, Annalisa Yahanan
{"title":"Problems of Justice in Legal Protection Efforts against Banks as Separatist Creditors related to Execution of Collateral Tied with Mortgage Rights on Bankrupt Debtor's Assets","authors":"Ilham Soetansah, Joni Emirzon, Annalisa Yahanan","doi":"10.47268/sasi.v28i3.1028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The rights of banks as separatist creditors in the UU-KPKPU cannot be implemented. Banks also often get a share that is not under the amount of debtor debt, causing injustice.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and explain the forms of justice problems in legal protection efforts against banks as separatist creditors related to the execution of collateral tied with mortgage rights on the assets of bankrupt debtors and their solutions.Methods of the Research: This research uses normative legal research. Research materials were used, namely secondary data and primary data as a support. This research material was collected by document study and interviews. The material that has been collected is then processed and analyzed using a qualitative approach, which is then drawn to conclusions using the deductive method.Results of the Research: There are two forms of the problem of justice in the legal protection of banks as separatist creditors related to the execution of collateral tied with mortgage rights on the assets of the bankrupt debtor. First, the neglect of bank rights as separatist creditors by UU-KPKPU can be seen in the provisions of Article 56 paragraph (1) and 59 paragraph (1) which contradicts Article 55 paragraph (1). Second, banks as separatist creditors often get a share that is not under the amount of debt of the bankrupt debtor. The author suggests that the UU-KPKPU be changed based on distributive justice which requires proportional distribution.","PeriodicalId":53158,"journal":{"name":"SASI","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SASI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i3.1028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The rights of banks as separatist creditors in the UU-KPKPU cannot be implemented. Banks also often get a share that is not under the amount of debtor debt, causing injustice.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and explain the forms of justice problems in legal protection efforts against banks as separatist creditors related to the execution of collateral tied with mortgage rights on the assets of bankrupt debtors and their solutions.Methods of the Research: This research uses normative legal research. Research materials were used, namely secondary data and primary data as a support. This research material was collected by document study and interviews. The material that has been collected is then processed and analyzed using a qualitative approach, which is then drawn to conclusions using the deductive method.Results of the Research: There are two forms of the problem of justice in the legal protection of banks as separatist creditors related to the execution of collateral tied with mortgage rights on the assets of the bankrupt debtor. First, the neglect of bank rights as separatist creditors by UU-KPKPU can be seen in the provisions of Article 56 paragraph (1) and 59 paragraph (1) which contradicts Article 55 paragraph (1). Second, banks as separatist creditors often get a share that is not under the amount of debt of the bankrupt debtor. The author suggests that the UU-KPKPU be changed based on distributive justice which requires proportional distribution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
破产债务人资产抵押权担保执行中对分离债权人银行法律保护的公正问题
银行作为分离主义债权人在UU-KPKPU中的权利无法实现。银行也经常得到不低于债务人债务数额的股份,造成不公正。研究目的:本研究旨在分析和解释与破产债务人资产抵押权相关的抵押品执行相关的法律保护工作中对银行作为分离债权人的司法问题的形式及其解决方案。研究方法:本研究采用规范法学研究。研究材料使用,即二手数据和原始数据作为支持。本研究资料采用文献研究法和访谈法收集。然后用定性方法对收集到的材料进行处理和分析,然后用演绎法得出结论。研究结果:在对银行作为分离债权人的法律保护中,存在两种形式的正义问题,涉及对破产债务人的资产执行与抵押权利挂钩的抵押品。首先,UU-KPKPU对作为分离债权人的银行权利的忽视体现在第56条第(1)款和第59条第(1)款的规定中,这与第55条第(1)款相矛盾。其次,作为分离债权人的银行所获得的份额往往不低于破产债务人的债务数额。建议以比例分配为前提的分配正义为基础对UU-KPKPU进行改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Legal Consequences of Transferring Trade Secrets on Under Hand’s Scheme Ius Constituendum Formulating Basic Values of Indigenous Peoples in Constitutional Amendments The Protection of Human Rights in the Case of Non-Criminal Narcotics Users Arrangements Concerning Reclamation and Their Legal Impacts in View from UNCLOS 1982 The Sharia Funding Risk Issues in Fintech Securities Crowdfunding: Realization of Legal Certainty in the Shari'ah Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1