A Question of Priority: Pterospora andromedea Nuttall vs. Monotropa procera Torrey ex Eaton (Monotropoideae, Ericaceae)

Aliso Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.5642/aliso.bwqh1814
G. Wallace
{"title":"A Question of Priority: Pterospora andromedea Nuttall vs. Monotropa procera Torrey ex Eaton (Monotropoideae, Ericaceae)","authors":"G. Wallace","doi":"10.5642/aliso.bwqh1814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clarity is lacking on the priority of the names Pterospora andromedea Nutt. versus Monotropa procera Torr. ex Eaton, both of which were published in 1818, and the suggested clear answer may not be the correct answer. Taxonomic Literature, second edition, provides a publication date of 14 July 1818 for Nuttall’s Genera of North American Plants and a publication date of June 1818 for Eaton’sManual of Botany ed. 2. However, upon closer scrutiny, the situation is more complex. The sources for these publication dates are discussed in order to trace the likely sequence of events leading up to publication. Findings suggest that it is unlikely that Eaton’sManual ed. 2 was published in June 1818. Additional evidence included in Eaton’s Manual ed. 2 and correspondence make it clear that Eaton was in possession of a published copy of Nuttall’s Genera as he was writing hisManual ed. 2. Consequently, regardless of exact date of publication of either of the works, Nuttall’sGenerawas published before Eaton’sManual ed. 2, so Pterospora andromedeaNutt. has priority over Monotropa procera Torr. ex Eaton and should remain the correct name.","PeriodicalId":80410,"journal":{"name":"Aliso","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aliso","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5642/aliso.bwqh1814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clarity is lacking on the priority of the names Pterospora andromedea Nutt. versus Monotropa procera Torr. ex Eaton, both of which were published in 1818, and the suggested clear answer may not be the correct answer. Taxonomic Literature, second edition, provides a publication date of 14 July 1818 for Nuttall’s Genera of North American Plants and a publication date of June 1818 for Eaton’sManual of Botany ed. 2. However, upon closer scrutiny, the situation is more complex. The sources for these publication dates are discussed in order to trace the likely sequence of events leading up to publication. Findings suggest that it is unlikely that Eaton’sManual ed. 2 was published in June 1818. Additional evidence included in Eaton’s Manual ed. 2 and correspondence make it clear that Eaton was in possession of a published copy of Nuttall’s Genera as he was writing hisManual ed. 2. Consequently, regardless of exact date of publication of either of the works, Nuttall’sGenerawas published before Eaton’sManual ed. 2, so Pterospora andromedeaNutt. has priority over Monotropa procera Torr. ex Eaton and should remain the correct name.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优先权问题:Pterospora andromedea Nuttall与Monotropa procera Torrey ex Eaton
对紫檀属植物名称的优先级缺乏明确性。与Monotropa procera Torr相比。这两本书都发表于1818年,所提出的明确答案可能不是正确的答案。《分类学文献》第二版为纳托尔的《北美植物属》提供了1818年7月14日的出版日期,为伊顿的《植物学手册》第2版提供了1814年6月的出版日期。然而,经过仔细审查,情况更加复杂。讨论了这些发布日期的来源,以便追踪发布前可能发生的事件序列。研究结果表明,Eaton的手册第2版不太可能在1818年6月出版。伊顿手册第2版和信件中包含的其他证据清楚地表明,伊顿在编写手册第2版本时,拥有一份已出版的《纳托尔通用》。因此,无论这两部作品的确切出版日期如何,Nuttall的《Generawa》都是在《Eaton’s Manual》第2版之前出版的,因此《Pterospora andromedea Nutt》也是如此。优先于Monotropa procera Torr。前Eaton,应保持正确的名称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Question of Priority: Pterospora andromedea Nuttall vs. Monotropa procera Torrey ex Eaton (Monotropoideae, Ericaceae) Sherwin Carlquist (1930-2021) - A Botanical Luminary Contents 40(1–2) A Vascular Flora of the Selkirk Mountains, Bonner and Boundary Counties, Idaho Reviewers of Manuscripts, Volumes 39-40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1