Theorizing Twain: A Personal View

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN Mark Twain Annual Pub Date : 2020-11-19 DOI:10.5325/marktwaij.18.1.0022
S. Harris
{"title":"Theorizing Twain: A Personal View","authors":"S. Harris","doi":"10.5325/marktwaij.18.1.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:How and why should Mark Twain scholars use literary theory? Although the American academy is no longer under the mandate to \"theorize\" everything, theory is still with us, and American literature scholars still have to decide where they stand in relationship to it. Twain studies, especially, seem resistant to theorizing, if for no other reason than Twain's persistent inconsistencies, which thwart systematic analysis. As a consequence, many Twain scholars ignore theory, working instead within the confines of traditional historical, biographical, and literary studies. In the process they produce excellent critical studies and engaging histories. Yet I often wonder what they might discover should they allow theory more space in their projects. Looking back over my own engagements with theory has strengthened my sense that used judiciously, literary theory can be a powerful tool, forcing us to think through phenomena we might otherwise ignore and teaching us how to articulate insights for which more traditional methodologies do not provide vocabulary—such as Twain's inconsistencies. In the following essay I offer my own history, not in order to trot out my vita, but in the hopes that my experience will invite a conversation over the relevance and uses of theory for Mark Twain studies.","PeriodicalId":41060,"journal":{"name":"Mark Twain Annual","volume":"18 1","pages":"22 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mark Twain Annual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/marktwaij.18.1.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:How and why should Mark Twain scholars use literary theory? Although the American academy is no longer under the mandate to "theorize" everything, theory is still with us, and American literature scholars still have to decide where they stand in relationship to it. Twain studies, especially, seem resistant to theorizing, if for no other reason than Twain's persistent inconsistencies, which thwart systematic analysis. As a consequence, many Twain scholars ignore theory, working instead within the confines of traditional historical, biographical, and literary studies. In the process they produce excellent critical studies and engaging histories. Yet I often wonder what they might discover should they allow theory more space in their projects. Looking back over my own engagements with theory has strengthened my sense that used judiciously, literary theory can be a powerful tool, forcing us to think through phenomena we might otherwise ignore and teaching us how to articulate insights for which more traditional methodologies do not provide vocabulary—such as Twain's inconsistencies. In the following essay I offer my own history, not in order to trot out my vita, but in the hopes that my experience will invite a conversation over the relevance and uses of theory for Mark Twain studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吐温的理论化:个人观点
摘要:马克吐温的学者应该如何以及为什么使用文学理论?尽管美国科学院不再被授权将一切“理论化”,但理论仍然与我们同在,美国文学学者仍然必须决定他们与理论的关系。尤其是吐温的研究似乎对理论化持抵制态度,原因无非是吐温持续的前后矛盾,阻碍了系统分析。因此,许多吐温的学者忽视了理论,而是在传统的历史、传记和文学研究的范围内工作。在这个过程中,他们产生了优秀的批判性研究和引人入胜的历史。然而,我经常想知道,如果他们在项目中给理论更多的空间,他们会发现什么。回顾我自己与理论的接触,增强了我的意识,即明智地使用文学理论可以成为一种强大的工具,迫使我们思考我们可能忽视的现象,并教会我们如何表达更传统的方法无法提供词汇的见解,如吐温的前后矛盾。在下面的文章中,我提供了我自己的历史,不是为了展示我的简历,而是希望我的经历能引发一场关于理论对马克·吐温研究的相关性和用途的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mark Twain Annual
Mark Twain Annual LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Mark Twain Annual publishes articles related to Mark Twain and those who surrounded him and serves as an outlet for new scholarship as well as new pedagogical approaches. It is the official publication of the Mark Twain Circle of America, an international association of people interested in the life and work of Mark Twain. The Circle encourages interest in Mark Twain and fosters the formal presentation of ideas about the author and his work, as well as the informal exchange of information among its members.
期刊最新文献
Studying Mark Twain’s The Diaries of Adam and Eve from a Ghanaian Context Susy Clemens: The Final Years The Stakes of Stormfield: On Mark Twain’s Vision of Heaven Critical Insights: The Adventures of Tom Sawyer Why I Still Teach Mark Twain in the Twenty-first-Century Indian Classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1