Halo effects in grading: an experimental approach

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2023-03-16 DOI:10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593
Fabian T. C. Schmidt, Aurelia Kaiser, Jan Retelsdorf
{"title":"Halo effects in grading: an experimental approach","authors":"Fabian T. C. Schmidt, Aurelia Kaiser, Jan Retelsdorf","doi":"10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Halo effects in teacher judgments, can occur when the assessment of one aspect of a person’s achievement is generalised to another aspect of achievement for that same person. We conducted an experimental study in which participants (N = 107) had to grade vignettes of the same student in two different subjects. The first vignette described either a weak, average, or strong performance, whereas the second vignette always described an average performance. Thereby, rich descriptions of achievement-relevant information were used, and the impact of influencing factors was reduced. The treatment condition emerged as a significant predictor of the grade given for the second vignette even after controlling for gender, status of the participants, and the gender of the student. The results suggest that participants’ ratings can be manipulated to show halo bias. The results support the view that teacher education should raise awareness of possible sources of the halo effect.","PeriodicalId":48053,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology","volume":"43 1","pages":"246 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2194593","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Halo effects in teacher judgments, can occur when the assessment of one aspect of a person’s achievement is generalised to another aspect of achievement for that same person. We conducted an experimental study in which participants (N = 107) had to grade vignettes of the same student in two different subjects. The first vignette described either a weak, average, or strong performance, whereas the second vignette always described an average performance. Thereby, rich descriptions of achievement-relevant information were used, and the impact of influencing factors was reduced. The treatment condition emerged as a significant predictor of the grade given for the second vignette even after controlling for gender, status of the participants, and the gender of the student. The results suggest that participants’ ratings can be manipulated to show halo bias. The results support the view that teacher education should raise awareness of possible sources of the halo effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分级中的光环效应:一种实验方法
当教师对一个人的成就的一个方面的评估被推广到同一个人的另一个方面的成就时,就会出现光环效应。我们进行了一项实验研究,参与者(N = 107)必须在两个不同的科目中对同一学生的小插曲进行评分。第一个小插曲描述了一个弱,一般或强的表现,而第二个小插曲总是描述一个平均的表现。因此,使用了丰富的成就相关信息描述,降低了影响因素的影响。即使在控制了性别、参与者的地位和学生的性别之后,治疗条件也成为第二个小插曲评分的重要预测因素。结果表明,参与者的评分可以被操纵以显示光环偏见。研究结果支持教师教育应提高对光环效应可能来源的认识的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: This journal provides an international forum for the discussion and rapid dissemination of research findings in psychology relevant to education. The journal places particular emphasis on the publishing of papers reporting applied research based on experimental and behavioural studies. Reviews of relevant areas of literature also appear from time to time. The aim of the journal is to be a primary source for articles dealing with the psychological aspects of education ranging from pre-school to tertiary provision and the education of children with special needs. The prompt publication of high-quality articles is the journal"s first priority. All contributions are submitted "blind" to at least two independent referees before acceptance for publication.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between trait mindfulness and academic performance: a meta-analysis “Wow, you’re really smart!” – How children’s self-esteem affects teachers’ praise Attributions for failure and success at primary school: a person-centered approach to causal dimensions Academic failure and psychological disengagement: can belief in school meritocracy make a difference? Exploring how demographic, adjustment, and online learning readiness related factors shape international students’ online learning anxiety: a hierarchical regression analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1