Lordship and State Formation. Bohemia and the Habsburg monarchy from the Thirty Years' War to Charles VI

Q4 Arts and Humanities Opera Historica Pub Date : 2017-03-30 DOI:10.32725/oph.2017.005
Stephan Sander-Faes
{"title":"Lordship and State Formation. Bohemia and the Habsburg monarchy from the Thirty Years' War to Charles VI","authors":"Stephan Sander-Faes","doi":"10.32725/oph.2017.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The decades around 1700 were decisive for both Central Europe and its major power, the Habsburg monarchy� Much has been written about its main events and protagonists from the Ottoman siege of Vienna and the subsequent pushback of Christendom’s „hereditary enemy“ across the Hungarian plains, and the contemporaneous wars against Louis XIV’s France, which culminated in the greatest territorial extent of the Austrian monarchy in the early 18th century�2 Hardly surprising, the historiography of this era is extensive, and in many cases very lopsided, yet despite the amounts of ink that have been spilled over the Habsburg monarchy’s so-called „Age of Heroes“, or Heldenzeitalter, there are also blind spots: Perhaps echoing much of the older literature, even most newer studies continue to focus on „big men“ and their actions at court, in the various diets, or on the many battle fields, often more or less influenced by the Cultural Turn, which resulted in the publication of a wide variety of studies highlighting the serious limitations of Habsburg absolutism, emphasising the symbolic characteristics of their rule, and offering systemic explanations for the changes in the wake of the Thirty Years’ War� This holds particularly true for the Westphalian treaties, viewed by many, historians and scholars in fields as diverse as International Relations, Political Science, Legal History, and Sociology alike as the foundation of our „modern“ era�3 If there is a common thread that unites virtually all of these studies, it is","PeriodicalId":36082,"journal":{"name":"Opera Historica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opera Historica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32725/oph.2017.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The decades around 1700 were decisive for both Central Europe and its major power, the Habsburg monarchy� Much has been written about its main events and protagonists from the Ottoman siege of Vienna and the subsequent pushback of Christendom’s „hereditary enemy“ across the Hungarian plains, and the contemporaneous wars against Louis XIV’s France, which culminated in the greatest territorial extent of the Austrian monarchy in the early 18th century�2 Hardly surprising, the historiography of this era is extensive, and in many cases very lopsided, yet despite the amounts of ink that have been spilled over the Habsburg monarchy’s so-called „Age of Heroes“, or Heldenzeitalter, there are also blind spots: Perhaps echoing much of the older literature, even most newer studies continue to focus on „big men“ and their actions at court, in the various diets, or on the many battle fields, often more or less influenced by the Cultural Turn, which resulted in the publication of a wide variety of studies highlighting the serious limitations of Habsburg absolutism, emphasising the symbolic characteristics of their rule, and offering systemic explanations for the changes in the wake of the Thirty Years’ War� This holds particularly true for the Westphalian treaties, viewed by many, historians and scholars in fields as diverse as International Relations, Political Science, Legal History, and Sociology alike as the foundation of our „modern“ era�3 If there is a common thread that unites virtually all of these studies, it is
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
领主和国家的形成。波希米亚和哈布斯堡王朝从三十年战争到查理六世
引言1700年前后的几十年对中欧及其主要大国哈布斯堡君主制都具有决定性意义� 关于它的主要事件和主角,从奥斯曼帝国围攻维也纳,到随后基督教世界的“世袭敌人”在匈牙利平原上的反击,再到同时期对路易十四统治下的法国的战争,都有很多文章,这些战争在18世纪初达到了奥地利君主制最大的领土范围�2毫不奇怪,这个时代的史学是广泛的,在许多情况下是非常不平衡的,然而,尽管哈布斯堡王朝所谓的“英雄时代”(Heroes Age)或赫尔登泽塔特(Heldenzeitalter“以及他们在宫廷、各种饮食或许多战场上的行为,往往或多或少地受到文化转向的影响,这导致发表了各种各样的研究,强调了哈布斯堡专制主义的严重局限性,强调了他们统治的象征性特征,并对三十年后的变化提供了系统的解释“战争� 威斯特伐利亚条约尤其如此,许多历史学家和学者认为,国际关系、政治学、法律史和社会学等领域的条约是我们“现代”时代的基础�3如果有一个共同的线索将几乎所有这些研究联系在一起,那就是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Opera Historica
Opera Historica Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Gifts of animals as a means of symbolic communication among the pre-White Mountain nobility On the Muscovite Gifts to the Austrian Habsburgs in the Late 16th Century Obraz Rudolfa II. v komunikaci mantovských vyslanců na císařském dvoře během sporu o říšské léno Novellara (1587-1591) News of the World The Role of Handwritten Newspapers in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the Early 18th Century Between rhetoric and propaganda Jesuit and Piarist panegyrics in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1