The governance authority of non-state actors in the business and human rights regime

IF 1 2区 社会学 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of Human Rights Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1080/14754835.2022.2104119
Janne Mende, Ann K. Hoff
{"title":"The governance authority of non-state actors in the business and human rights regime","authors":"Janne Mende, Ann K. Hoff","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2022.2104119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The symposium “Governance Authority in Business and Human Rights” explores the authority of non-state actors in the global business and human rights (BHR) regime. Our point of departure is that the involvement of different public and private actors in the BHR regime rests on their authority as governance actors. This alludes most obviously to companies, but also includes other actors. In this framing paper, we investigate these actors’ governance authority in three steps, which provides insights into the different ways in which their power in the BHR regime is (or is not) legitimated. First, we outline how the multiplication of actors in the BHR regime raises questions and challenges regarding its governance. In the second step, we introduce a concept of governance authority that captures distinctive forms of power and legitimacy, and how they connect to human rights. Third, we discuss how the concept of governance authority can be used to study particular non-state actors in the BHR regime, and how the contributions to this symposium do so. In sum, we discuss avenues for research that disentangle the different types of governance power and legitimacy of multiple actors in the BHR regime to clarify their public and private roles as well as their relevance in BHR governance.","PeriodicalId":51734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Rights","volume":"21 1","pages":"593 - 603"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2022.2104119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The symposium “Governance Authority in Business and Human Rights” explores the authority of non-state actors in the global business and human rights (BHR) regime. Our point of departure is that the involvement of different public and private actors in the BHR regime rests on their authority as governance actors. This alludes most obviously to companies, but also includes other actors. In this framing paper, we investigate these actors’ governance authority in three steps, which provides insights into the different ways in which their power in the BHR regime is (or is not) legitimated. First, we outline how the multiplication of actors in the BHR regime raises questions and challenges regarding its governance. In the second step, we introduce a concept of governance authority that captures distinctive forms of power and legitimacy, and how they connect to human rights. Third, we discuss how the concept of governance authority can be used to study particular non-state actors in the BHR regime, and how the contributions to this symposium do so. In sum, we discuss avenues for research that disentangle the different types of governance power and legitimacy of multiple actors in the BHR regime to clarify their public and private roles as well as their relevance in BHR governance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非国家行为体在商业和人权制度中的治理权威
“工商业与人权中的治理权威”研讨会探讨了非国家行为体在全球工商业与人权(BHR)机制中的权威。我们的出发点是,不同的公共和私人行为体参与BHR制度取决于他们作为治理行为体的权威。这显然指的是公司,但也包括其他参与者。在这篇框架论文中,我们分三个步骤调查了这些参与者的治理权威,这为他们在BHR制度中的权力合法化(或不合法化)的不同方式提供了见解。首先,我们概述了BHR制度中行动者的增加如何对其治理提出问题和挑战。在第二步中,我们引入了一个治理权威的概念,该概念抓住了权力和合法性的不同形式,以及它们如何与人权联系起来。第三,我们讨论了如何使用治理权威的概念来研究BHR制度中的特定非国家行为体,以及本次研讨会的贡献如何做到这一点。总之,我们讨论了研究途径,以理清BHR制度中不同类型的治理权力和多个参与者的合法性,以澄清他们的公共和私人角色以及他们在BHR治理中的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Copy thy neighbor: Spatial interdependences in the democracy-repression nexus From human rights to “righteous humans”: Brazilian foreign policy in the Bolsonaro era Disruption and emergence: How to think about human rights futures How to consolidate quickly: The cases of Algeria and Tunisia Meanings of the human rights concept: Tunisian activism in the 1970s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1