Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer

IF 1.3 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologic Oncology Reports Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gore.2019.07.009
Nobuki Imano , Koichi Wadasaki , Ikuno Nishibuchi , Yasushi Nagata
{"title":"Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer","authors":"Nobuki Imano ,&nbsp;Koichi Wadasaki ,&nbsp;Ikuno Nishibuchi ,&nbsp;Yasushi Nagata","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2019.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to analyze the clinical results of radiotherapy for cervical cancer using two-dimensional (2D) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) and computed tomography (CT)-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) at our institution. Patients with stage IB–IVA cervical cancer who received ICBT between April 2008 and April 2014 were included in this study. In total 58 patients were assessed. The first 38 patients received ICBT with the 2D treatment plan (the 2D group), and the remaining 20 patients received CT-based IGBT (the IGBT group). The dose of point A tended to be lower in the IGBT group (mean value, 60.6 Gy vs. 62.5 Gy; p = .07), though the minimum dose to the 90% (D90) of the clinical target volume (CTV) was equivalent in both groups (mean value, 66.0 Gy vs. 66.2 Gy; p = .91). The rectum minimum dose to 2 cc (D2cc) was significantly lower in the IGBT group than in the 2D group (mean value, 61.2 Gy vs. 69.1 Gy; p = .001). With a median follow-up time of 60 months, the 5-year local control rates (LCRs) of the IGBT group and 2D group were 100% and 83%, respectively (p = .12). The 5-year incidence of rectal complications in the IGBT group and the 2D group were 11% and 29%, respectively (p = .26). Our study showed favorable LCR and preferred incidence of rectal complications in patients treated with CT-based IGBT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":"29 ","pages":"Pages 79-82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gore.2019.07.009","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578919300712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the clinical results of radiotherapy for cervical cancer using two-dimensional (2D) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) and computed tomography (CT)-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) at our institution. Patients with stage IB–IVA cervical cancer who received ICBT between April 2008 and April 2014 were included in this study. In total 58 patients were assessed. The first 38 patients received ICBT with the 2D treatment plan (the 2D group), and the remaining 20 patients received CT-based IGBT (the IGBT group). The dose of point A tended to be lower in the IGBT group (mean value, 60.6 Gy vs. 62.5 Gy; p = .07), though the minimum dose to the 90% (D90) of the clinical target volume (CTV) was equivalent in both groups (mean value, 66.0 Gy vs. 66.2 Gy; p = .91). The rectum minimum dose to 2 cc (D2cc) was significantly lower in the IGBT group than in the 2D group (mean value, 61.2 Gy vs. 69.1 Gy; p = .001). With a median follow-up time of 60 months, the 5-year local control rates (LCRs) of the IGBT group and 2D group were 100% and 83%, respectively (p = .12). The 5-year incidence of rectal complications in the IGBT group and the 2D group were 11% and 29%, respectively (p = .26). Our study showed favorable LCR and preferred incidence of rectal complications in patients treated with CT-based IGBT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于计算机断层成像的近距离放射治疗与基于二维的近距离放射治疗宫颈癌的临床效果比较
本研究旨在分析我院采用二维(2D)腔内近距离放射治疗(ICBT)和基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的图像引导近距离放射治疗(IGBT)治疗宫颈癌的临床效果。本研究纳入2008年4月至2014年4月期间接受ICBT治疗的IB-IVA期宫颈癌患者。共对58例患者进行了评估。前38例患者采用2D治疗方案进行ICBT (2D组),其余20例患者采用基于ct的IGBT (IGBT组)。IGBT组A点剂量倾向较低(平均值,60.6 Gy vs. 62.5 Gy;p = .07),尽管两组达到临床靶体积(CTV) 90%的最小剂量(D90)是相等的(平均值,66.0 Gy vs. 66.2 Gy; = 点页)。IGBT组直肠最小剂量2 cc (D2cc)显著低于2D组(平均值,61.2 Gy vs. 69.1 Gy;p = 措施)。中位随访60 个月,IGBT组和2D组5年局部控制率(lcr)分别为100%和83% (p = .12)。IGBT组和2D组5年直肠并发症发生率分别为11%和29% (p = .26)。我们的研究显示,在接受基于ct的IGBT治疗的患者中,LCR和直肠并发症的发生率较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Gynecologic Oncology Reports OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
183
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.
期刊最新文献
A case of perioperative and intraoperative management of a rare vaginal paraganglioma Temporary intraperitoneal breast implant spacer to facilitate safe stereotactic body radiotherapy for recurrent high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma Assessing long-term quality of life and survivorship priorities in cervical cancer patients: a social media survey-based study Gynecologic oncology education for obstetrics and gynecology residents: a needs assessment Adverse childhood experiences, obesity, and endometrial cancer: A case series and scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1