Gender analysis in measurement materials: Critical thinking ability and science processing skills

D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan*, Endah Febri Setiya Rini
{"title":"Gender analysis in measurement materials: Critical thinking ability and science processing skills","authors":"D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan*, Endah Febri Setiya Rini","doi":"10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v11i1.11509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine whether there is a relationship and difference between science process skills and students' critical thinking skills based on gender. This type of research is descriptive quantitative research. The instruments used observation sheets and essay test questions. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling with samples of 90 students. The data analysis technique used by the researcher was descriptive statistics of Pearson Correlation and ANOVA tests. The results obtained were that the science process skills of students at SMPN 2 Batanghari were classified as good and dominated by female students with a percentage of 80.4%. Critical thinking skills were dominated by female students with a percentage of 32.6% (very critical). Then, there was a significant relationship between science process skills and students' critical thinking skills. Then, in the ANOVA test, male and female students' p-values of science process skills and critical thinking skills were less than 0.05. Therefore, there was a difference between the scientific process and the critical thinking skills of female and male students. This research is expected to contribute to schools and further research to improve learning methods that support critical thinking and science process skills.","PeriodicalId":31460,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika AlBiruni","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika AlBiruni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v11i1.11509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether there is a relationship and difference between science process skills and students' critical thinking skills based on gender. This type of research is descriptive quantitative research. The instruments used observation sheets and essay test questions. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling with samples of 90 students. The data analysis technique used by the researcher was descriptive statistics of Pearson Correlation and ANOVA tests. The results obtained were that the science process skills of students at SMPN 2 Batanghari were classified as good and dominated by female students with a percentage of 80.4%. Critical thinking skills were dominated by female students with a percentage of 32.6% (very critical). Then, there was a significant relationship between science process skills and students' critical thinking skills. Then, in the ANOVA test, male and female students' p-values of science process skills and critical thinking skills were less than 0.05. Therefore, there was a difference between the scientific process and the critical thinking skills of female and male students. This research is expected to contribute to schools and further research to improve learning methods that support critical thinking and science process skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量材料中的性别分析:批判性思维能力和科学处理技能
本研究旨在确定科学过程技能与学生批判性思维技能之间是否存在基于性别的关系和差异。这种类型的研究是描述性定量研究。测试工具采用了观察纸和论述题。采用的抽样方法是有目的抽样,样本为90名学生。研究人员使用的数据分析技术是Pearson相关和ANOVA检验的描述性统计。结果表明,巴登哈里中学第二阶段学生的科学处理技能为良好,女生占多数,占80.4%。批判性思维技能以女生为主,占32.6%(非常批判性)。科学过程技能与学生批判性思维技能之间存在显著的相关关系。然后,在ANOVA检验中,男女学生的科学过程技能和批判性思维技能的p值均小于0.05。因此,男女学生的科学过程和批判性思维能力存在差异。这项研究有望为学校和进一步的研究做出贡献,以改善支持批判性思维和科学过程技能的学习方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploration of Increasing Students’ Critical Thinking in the Guided Discovery Learning Model on Light Waves An Analysis of Learning Styles on Renewable Energy Material in Independent Curriculum for Differentiation Learning REACT Learning on the Topic of Elasticity to Enhance Students' Analytical Abilities The Effect of Ethnoscience-Based Science Environment Technology Society (SETS) Learning Model in Learning Physics and Biology Is 21st Century Learning Need STEM Approach built into Physics Comics?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1