Hateful and Other Negative Communication in Online Commenting Environments: Content, Structure and Targets

IF 0.8 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Acta Informatica Pragensia Pub Date : 2021-11-21 DOI:10.18267/j.aip.165
Vasja Vehovar, D. Jontes
{"title":"Hateful and Other Negative Communication in Online Commenting Environments: Content, Structure and Targets","authors":"Vasja Vehovar, D. Jontes","doi":"10.18267/j.aip.165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information and communication technologies are increasingly interacting with modern societies. One specific manifestation of this interaction concerns hateful and other negative comments in online environments. Various terms appear to denote this communication, from flaming, indecency and intolerance to hate speech. However, there is still a lack of an umbrella term that broadly captures this communication. Therefore, this paper introduces the concept of socially unacceptable discourse, which serves as the basis for an empirical study that evaluated online comments scraped from the Facebook pages of the three most-visited Slovenian news outlets. Machine-learning algorithms were used to narrow the focus to topics related to refugees and LGBT rights. Ten thousand comments were manually coded to identify and structure socially undesirable discourse. The results show that about half of all comments belonged to this type of discourse, with a surprisingly stable level and structure across media (i.e., right-wing versus mainstream) and topics. Most of these comments could also be considered a potential violation of hate speech legislation. In the context of these findings, the political and ideological consequences and implications of mediatised emotions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":36592,"journal":{"name":"Acta Informatica Pragensia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Informatica Pragensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aip.165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Information and communication technologies are increasingly interacting with modern societies. One specific manifestation of this interaction concerns hateful and other negative comments in online environments. Various terms appear to denote this communication, from flaming, indecency and intolerance to hate speech. However, there is still a lack of an umbrella term that broadly captures this communication. Therefore, this paper introduces the concept of socially unacceptable discourse, which serves as the basis for an empirical study that evaluated online comments scraped from the Facebook pages of the three most-visited Slovenian news outlets. Machine-learning algorithms were used to narrow the focus to topics related to refugees and LGBT rights. Ten thousand comments were manually coded to identify and structure socially undesirable discourse. The results show that about half of all comments belonged to this type of discourse, with a surprisingly stable level and structure across media (i.e., right-wing versus mainstream) and topics. Most of these comments could also be considered a potential violation of hate speech legislation. In the context of these findings, the political and ideological consequences and implications of mediatised emotions are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络评论环境中的仇恨和其他负面交流:内容、结构和目标
信息和通信技术正日益与现代社会相互作用。这种互动的一个具体表现是网络环境中的仇恨和其他负面评论。各种各样的术语似乎表示这种交流,从愤怒、猥亵和不容忍到仇恨言论。然而,仍然缺乏一个总括性的术语来概括这种交流。因此,本文引入了社会不可接受话语的概念,这是一项实证研究的基础,该研究评估了从访问量最大的三家斯洛文尼亚新闻媒体的脸书页面上截取的在线评论。机器学习算法被用来将焦点缩小到与难民和LGBT权利有关的话题。一万条评论被人工编码,以识别和构建社会上不受欢迎的话语。结果显示,大约一半的评论属于这种类型的话语,在媒体(即右翼与主流)和话题中具有令人惊讶的稳定水平和结构。这些言论中的大多数也可能被视为潜在的违反仇恨言论立法的行为。在这些发现的背景下,讨论了调解情绪的政治和意识形态后果及其含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Informatica Pragensia
Acta Informatica Pragensia Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Visualisation of User Stories in UML Models: A Systematic Literature Review Safe Haven for Asian Equity Markets During Financial Distress: Bitcoin Versus Gold Consumer Behaviour in Gamified Environment: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review in Business and Management Area Impact of Women Driving Rights on Adoption and Usage of E-hailing Applications in Saudi Arabia Use of Data Mining for Analysis of Czech Real Estate Market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1