Examining Journalist’s Perception of Fake News and Their Attitude toward Debunking disinformation

Erlis Çela
{"title":"Examining Journalist’s Perception of Fake News and Their Attitude toward Debunking disinformation","authors":"Erlis Çela","doi":"10.11114/smc.v11i6.6307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fake news and other forms of disinformation pose a serious threat to the news ecosystem and the informing of audiences, who are increasingly dependent on online sources of information. After the attention paid to the spreading of fake news, researchers have focused on the study of the negative effects that different typologies of disinformation are prone to having on audiences. Similarly, great attention has also been paid to the motives that users have for the spreading of fake news.These studies, which combine various disciplines, attempt to analyze the psychological factors and motives that lead users to engage with online fake news. On the other hand, several studies have analyzed the role of platforms and their algorithmic logic, as well as the main approaches for addressing this significant problem. Although much effort has been devoted to the phenomenon of disinformation in social media, the role of professional journalists in exposing false information has not been given the necessary attention.Albania is a country with a high rate of fake news and conspiracy theories. This study will investigate the Albanian journalists’ perception of fake news and the risk in them being used as a means of (dis)informing the audience. It will also focus on how this perception affects their behavior and willingness to debunk disinformation on social media. Making use of a national-level questionnaire, to which 270 journalists contributing in the Albanian media responded, the study aims to answer some important questions about the role of journalists in addressing disinformation issues in the social media space. The findings from this study indicate that although journalists in Albania perceive fake news as a danger to democracy, the media and the journalism profession, they do not seem motivated to engage in the debunking actions and exposing of fake news circulating online.","PeriodicalId":91409,"journal":{"name":"Studies in media and communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in media and communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v11i6.6307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fake news and other forms of disinformation pose a serious threat to the news ecosystem and the informing of audiences, who are increasingly dependent on online sources of information. After the attention paid to the spreading of fake news, researchers have focused on the study of the negative effects that different typologies of disinformation are prone to having on audiences. Similarly, great attention has also been paid to the motives that users have for the spreading of fake news.These studies, which combine various disciplines, attempt to analyze the psychological factors and motives that lead users to engage with online fake news. On the other hand, several studies have analyzed the role of platforms and their algorithmic logic, as well as the main approaches for addressing this significant problem. Although much effort has been devoted to the phenomenon of disinformation in social media, the role of professional journalists in exposing false information has not been given the necessary attention.Albania is a country with a high rate of fake news and conspiracy theories. This study will investigate the Albanian journalists’ perception of fake news and the risk in them being used as a means of (dis)informing the audience. It will also focus on how this perception affects their behavior and willingness to debunk disinformation on social media. Making use of a national-level questionnaire, to which 270 journalists contributing in the Albanian media responded, the study aims to answer some important questions about the role of journalists in addressing disinformation issues in the social media space. The findings from this study indicate that although journalists in Albania perceive fake news as a danger to democracy, the media and the journalism profession, they do not seem motivated to engage in the debunking actions and exposing of fake news circulating online.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记者对假新闻的认知及其揭露虚假信息的态度
假新闻和其他形式的虚假信息对新闻生态系统和受众信息构成严重威胁,受众越来越依赖在线信息来源。在人们关注假新闻的传播之后,研究人员专注于研究不同类型的虚假信息容易对受众产生的负面影响。同样,用户传播假新闻的动机也受到了极大关注。这些研究结合了各个学科,试图分析导致用户参与网络假新闻的心理因素和动机。另一方面,一些研究分析了平台的作用及其算法逻辑,以及解决这一重大问题的主要方法。尽管人们对社交媒体中的虚假信息现象付出了很大努力,但专业记者在揭露虚假信息方面的作用却没有得到必要的关注。阿尔巴尼亚是一个假新闻和阴谋论高发的国家。这项研究将调查阿尔巴尼亚记者对假新闻的看法,以及他们被用作向观众提供信息的手段的风险。它还将关注这种看法如何影响他们在社交媒体上揭穿虚假信息的行为和意愿。这项研究利用国家一级的问卷调查(阿尔巴尼亚媒体的270名记者对此作出了回应),旨在回答一些关于记者在解决社交媒体领域虚假信息问题方面的作用的重要问题。这项研究的结果表明,尽管阿尔巴尼亚的记者认为假新闻对民主、媒体和新闻业构成威胁,但他们似乎没有动机参与揭露和揭露网上流传的假新闻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing the Needs of Counselor's Communication Competencies in Assisting Child Victims of Sexual Violence Pedagogy of Freedom: Van-Dijk’s Socio-Cognitive Discursive Analysis on Nadiem Makariem Endgame Podcast The Digital Agora Fights Back: Building Disinformation Resilience One Initiative at a Time Netizens’ Discussions on Twitter Concerning Floods and Presidential Candidates The Shift in the Use of Keigo by Migrant Care workers on TikTok Social Media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1