Reurbanisation and suburbia in Northwest Europe: A comparative perspective on spatial trends and policy approaches

IF 5 1区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Progress in Planning Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.progress.2019.100462
Sebastian Dembski , Olivier Sykes , Chris Couch , Xavier Desjardins , David Evers , Frank Osterhage , Stefan Siedentop , Karsten Zimmermann
{"title":"Reurbanisation and suburbia in Northwest Europe: A comparative perspective on spatial trends and policy approaches","authors":"Sebastian Dembski ,&nbsp;Olivier Sykes ,&nbsp;Chris Couch ,&nbsp;Xavier Desjardins ,&nbsp;David Evers ,&nbsp;Frank Osterhage ,&nbsp;Stefan Siedentop ,&nbsp;Karsten Zimmermann","doi":"10.1016/j.progress.2019.100462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Following decades of urban decline in many European cities, there is now an abundant literature identifying a process of reurbanisation, which has now also reached many secondary cities, including those in post-industrialised regions. Reurbanisation is an umbrella concept involving several related but distinct processes, though has its roots in spatial cycle models that consider reurbanisation to be a specific stage in the development of urban regions. Most of the emerging reurbanisation debate, however, is primarily concerned with processes in and impacts on the urban core while suburbia (the ring) is notably absent from much of this discussion. This is all the more surprising since part and parcel of many definitions of reurbanisation is the relationship between the core and the ring. This paper seeks to fill this gap, looking at four highly developed countries in Northwest Europe from a comparative perspective: England, France, Germany and the Netherlands. Far from being uniform, reurbanisation differs substantially between the countries in terms of temporal and spatial patterns due to differences in policy responses in both the urban core and suburbia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47399,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Planning","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 100462"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.progress.2019.100462","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Planning","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305900619300637","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Following decades of urban decline in many European cities, there is now an abundant literature identifying a process of reurbanisation, which has now also reached many secondary cities, including those in post-industrialised regions. Reurbanisation is an umbrella concept involving several related but distinct processes, though has its roots in spatial cycle models that consider reurbanisation to be a specific stage in the development of urban regions. Most of the emerging reurbanisation debate, however, is primarily concerned with processes in and impacts on the urban core while suburbia (the ring) is notably absent from much of this discussion. This is all the more surprising since part and parcel of many definitions of reurbanisation is the relationship between the core and the ring. This paper seeks to fill this gap, looking at four highly developed countries in Northwest Europe from a comparative perspective: England, France, Germany and the Netherlands. Far from being uniform, reurbanisation differs substantially between the countries in terms of temporal and spatial patterns due to differences in policy responses in both the urban core and suburbia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西北欧的再城市化和郊区化:空间趋势和政策方法的比较视角
在许多欧洲城市经历了几十年的城市衰落之后,现在有大量的文献发现了一个再城市化的过程,这一过程现在也到达了许多二线城市,包括那些后工业化地区的城市。再城市化是一个涵盖了几个相关但不同的过程的概念,尽管其根源在于空间循环模型,该模型认为再城市化是城市区域发展的一个特定阶段。然而,大多数新兴的再城市化辩论主要关注的是城市核心的过程和影响,而郊区(环)在这一讨论中明显缺席。这就更令人惊讶了,因为许多关于再城市化的定义的重要组成部分就是核心和环之间的关系。本文试图填补这一空白,从比较的角度考察了西北欧四个高度发达的国家:英国、法国、德国和荷兰。由于城市核心区和郊区的政策反应不同,各国之间的再城市化在时间和空间模式上根本不一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
1.60%
发文量
26
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Planning is a multidisciplinary journal of research monographs offering a convenient and rapid outlet for extended papers in the field of spatial and environmental planning. Each issue comprises a single monograph of between 25,000 and 35,000 words. The journal is fully peer reviewed, has a global readership, and has been in publication since 1972.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Editorial Board Immigrants, slums, and housing policy: The spatial dispersal of the Ethiopian population in Israel Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1