{"title":"Engineering Brussels Tapestry: Development, Uses and Effects of the Privilege System, 1600–1700","authors":"K. Brosens","doi":"10.1080/00404969.2022.2113754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By conceptualising and analysing the privileges awarded to Brussels tapestry actors in the seventeenth century as serial data, and thus as a — consistently inconsistent — system, and by combining quantitative and qualitative readings of the data, this essay refines our understanding of the mechanics of Brussels baroque tapestry. One of the most salient insights is the marginal position of painters within the privilege system, showing that producers — and therefore patrons — identified ‘Brussels tapestry’ with quality of materials and weft rather than with a specific pictorial style. Ensuring quality, however, was complex, as it was dependent on the varying agendas of different stakeholders. The essay shows how they constantly adapted the privilege system to navigate and mitigate not only these issues, but also contextual factors that impacted the Brussels art worlds. Thus, the essay can also serve as a backdrop against which future studies of Brussels baroque art can be placed.","PeriodicalId":43311,"journal":{"name":"TEXTILE HISTORY","volume":"53 1","pages":"32 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEXTILE HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00404969.2022.2113754","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
By conceptualising and analysing the privileges awarded to Brussels tapestry actors in the seventeenth century as serial data, and thus as a — consistently inconsistent — system, and by combining quantitative and qualitative readings of the data, this essay refines our understanding of the mechanics of Brussels baroque tapestry. One of the most salient insights is the marginal position of painters within the privilege system, showing that producers — and therefore patrons — identified ‘Brussels tapestry’ with quality of materials and weft rather than with a specific pictorial style. Ensuring quality, however, was complex, as it was dependent on the varying agendas of different stakeholders. The essay shows how they constantly adapted the privilege system to navigate and mitigate not only these issues, but also contextual factors that impacted the Brussels art worlds. Thus, the essay can also serve as a backdrop against which future studies of Brussels baroque art can be placed.
期刊介绍:
Textile History is an internationally recognised, peer reviewed journal and one of the leading publications in its field. It is viewed as an important outlet for current research. Published in the spring and autumn of each year, its remit has always been to facilitate the publication of high-quality research and discussion in all aspects of scholarship arising from the history of textiles and dress. Since its foundation the scope of the journal has been substantially expanded to include articles dealing with aspects of the cultural and social history of apparel and textiles, as well as issues arising from the exhibition, preservation and interpretation of historic textiles or clothing.