Pathways to cultural adaptation: the coevolution of cumulative culture and social networks

IF 2.2 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Evolutionary Human Sciences Pub Date : 2023-02-21 DOI:10.1101/2023.02.21.529416
M. Smolla, Erol Akçay
{"title":"Pathways to cultural adaptation: the coevolution of cumulative culture and social networks","authors":"M. Smolla, Erol Akçay","doi":"10.1101/2023.02.21.529416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Humans have adapted to an immense array of ecologies by accumulating culturally transmitted knowledge and skills. Culture accumulates in at least two ways: via more distinct cultural traits, or via improvements of existing cultural trait. A trade-off is expected between these owing to the fact that social learning opportunities are finite and social learning often requires multiple exposures. Furthermore, what kind of culture accumulates depends on, and coevolves with, the social structure of societies. Here we show that the coevolution of social networks for learning and cumulative culture results in two distinct pathways to cultural adaptation: highly connected populations with high proficiency but low cultural trait diversity vs. sparsely connected populations with low proficiency but more cultural trait diversity. Importantly, we show there is a general conflict between group-level payoffs, which is maximised in highly connected groups that attain high proficiency, and individual level selection, which favours disconnection. This conflict emerges from the interaction of social learning with population structure and causes populations to cycle between the two cultural and network states. The same conflict creates a paradox where improving individual innovation rates lowers the payoffs of groups. Finally, we explore how populations navigate these two pathways in heterogeneous and changing environments, and show that high heterogeneity in payoffs and slow rate of environmental change favours high proficiency, while fast rate of environmental change favours more trait diversity. We also find that the proficiency pathway to cultural adaptation is favoured with increased population size, but only in slow changing environments. Our results uncover previously unrecognised trade-offs and tensions in the coevolutionary dynamics of cumulative culture and social structure, with broad implications for human social evolution.","PeriodicalId":36414,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Human Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Human Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.21.529416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans have adapted to an immense array of ecologies by accumulating culturally transmitted knowledge and skills. Culture accumulates in at least two ways: via more distinct cultural traits, or via improvements of existing cultural trait. A trade-off is expected between these owing to the fact that social learning opportunities are finite and social learning often requires multiple exposures. Furthermore, what kind of culture accumulates depends on, and coevolves with, the social structure of societies. Here we show that the coevolution of social networks for learning and cumulative culture results in two distinct pathways to cultural adaptation: highly connected populations with high proficiency but low cultural trait diversity vs. sparsely connected populations with low proficiency but more cultural trait diversity. Importantly, we show there is a general conflict between group-level payoffs, which is maximised in highly connected groups that attain high proficiency, and individual level selection, which favours disconnection. This conflict emerges from the interaction of social learning with population structure and causes populations to cycle between the two cultural and network states. The same conflict creates a paradox where improving individual innovation rates lowers the payoffs of groups. Finally, we explore how populations navigate these two pathways in heterogeneous and changing environments, and show that high heterogeneity in payoffs and slow rate of environmental change favours high proficiency, while fast rate of environmental change favours more trait diversity. We also find that the proficiency pathway to cultural adaptation is favoured with increased population size, but only in slow changing environments. Our results uncover previously unrecognised trade-offs and tensions in the coevolutionary dynamics of cumulative culture and social structure, with broad implications for human social evolution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化适应的途径:累积文化与社会网络的共同进化
人类通过积累文化传播的知识和技能,适应了大量的生态环境。文化至少以两种方式积累:通过更独特的文化特征,或通过对现有文化特征的改进。由于社会学习机会有限,社会学习往往需要多次接触,因此预计两者之间会有权衡。此外,什么样的文化积累取决于社会的社会结构,并与之共同发展。在这里,我们表明,学习和累积文化的社会网络的共同进化导致了两条不同的文化适应途径:具有高熟练度但文化特征多样性较低的高度联系人群与具有低熟练度但更具文化特征多样度的稀疏联系人群。重要的是,我们表明,在群体层面的回报和个人层面的选择之间存在普遍冲突,群体层面的收益在获得高熟练度的高度连接的群体中最大化,而个人层面的回报有利于断开连接。这种冲突源于社会学习与人口结构的互动,并导致人口在两种文化和网络状态之间循环。同样的冲突造成了一个悖论,即提高个人创新率会降低群体的回报。最后,我们探索了种群如何在异质和不断变化的环境中驾驭这两条路径,并表明收益的高度异质性和环境变化的缓慢速率有利于高熟练度,而环境变化的快速速率有利于更多的性状多样性。我们还发现,随着人口规模的增加,文化适应的熟练途径是有利的,但只有在缓慢变化的环境中。我们的研究结果揭示了累积文化和社会结构的共同进化动力学中以前未被认识到的权衡和紧张关系,对人类社会进化有着广泛的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolutionary Human Sciences
Evolutionary Human Sciences Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Coevolution of norm psychology and cooperation through exapted conformity. Salience of infectious diseases did not increase xenophobia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Testing the expensive-tissue hypothesis' prediction of inter-tissue competition using causal modelling with latent variables. Kin selection as a modulator of human handedness: sex-specific, parental and parent-of-origin effects. The role of mating effort and co-residence history in step-grandparental investment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1