An investigation into the information-seeking behaviour of professionals, working within the pharmaceutical manufacturing sector in Ireland

IF 1.3 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Library Management Pub Date : 2022-04-12 DOI:10.1108/lm-11-2021-0099
Berniece A Browne, Konstantina Martzoukou
{"title":"An investigation into the information-seeking behaviour of professionals, working within the pharmaceutical manufacturing sector in Ireland","authors":"Berniece A Browne, Konstantina Martzoukou","doi":"10.1108/lm-11-2021-0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis research aimed to investigate the information-seeking behaviour (ISB) and information needs of different professional groups within the pharmaceutical manufacturing sector in the Republic of Ireland (i.e. for what purpose information is acquired), the information sources professional groups use (including in-house documentation, regulations, industry guidelines, standards and colleagues) and the factors, which influence professional groups' choice of information sources. Furthermore, the research explored the perceived level of support that exists towards knowledge and information sharing.Design/methodology/approachA quantitative non-experimental research design, comprising of a self-completion survey questionnaire, was used to examine a number of information-seeking variables: information triggers, information sources and source influencers as well as information sharing enablers. It was related to four professional tasks: process technology/process development, regulatory support and quality/compliance support and engineering.FindingsThe research provides new insights into the ISB of pharmaceutical professionals working within a highly regulated and high-performance production environment, including a greater understanding of the context in which professional groups experience information needs. The levels of agreement observed in relation to employees' perception of information-sharing enablers indicated an overall positive level of information sharing.Research limitations/implicationsThe study points to largely echoed previous findings which suggest that individual work role associated tasks prompt particular information needs. Further to this, work role associated tasks have a bearing on information source selection. Pharmaceutical professionals engaged in positive levels of information and knowledge sharing, relying on procedures, other colleagues and internal documentation as information sources. The participants also indicated a high level of agreement in respect to the value of available subject matter experts as information-sharing enablers.Practical implicationsOrganisations should aim to create opportunities for adequate time to share information and organisational structures, facilitating an overall organisational culture of sharing. A focus on information sharing through forums, seminars, meetings and working groups could enhance information sharing, through the development of communities of practice.Social implicationsPharmaceutical professionals relied on trustworthiness and quality as professional' top information source-influencing factors. Furthermore, the study demonstrated that working within a high-performance, target-driven and time-constrained production environment brings a particular contextual impact, where frequent urgent information triggers are experienced. These contextual factors warrant further investigation.Originality/valueA paucity of information exists with respect to the ISB of professionals, working within the pharmaceutical manufacturing sector, which is a sector known for its high level of information use and production. This paper offered an original empirical investigation of the ISB of professionals, working within the pharmaceutical manufacturing sector in the Republic of Ireland, focussing on key professional tasks. The research also addressed the level of support available for knowledge and information sharing.","PeriodicalId":46701,"journal":{"name":"Library Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lm-11-2021-0099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis research aimed to investigate the information-seeking behaviour (ISB) and information needs of different professional groups within the pharmaceutical manufacturing sector in the Republic of Ireland (i.e. for what purpose information is acquired), the information sources professional groups use (including in-house documentation, regulations, industry guidelines, standards and colleagues) and the factors, which influence professional groups' choice of information sources. Furthermore, the research explored the perceived level of support that exists towards knowledge and information sharing.Design/methodology/approachA quantitative non-experimental research design, comprising of a self-completion survey questionnaire, was used to examine a number of information-seeking variables: information triggers, information sources and source influencers as well as information sharing enablers. It was related to four professional tasks: process technology/process development, regulatory support and quality/compliance support and engineering.FindingsThe research provides new insights into the ISB of pharmaceutical professionals working within a highly regulated and high-performance production environment, including a greater understanding of the context in which professional groups experience information needs. The levels of agreement observed in relation to employees' perception of information-sharing enablers indicated an overall positive level of information sharing.Research limitations/implicationsThe study points to largely echoed previous findings which suggest that individual work role associated tasks prompt particular information needs. Further to this, work role associated tasks have a bearing on information source selection. Pharmaceutical professionals engaged in positive levels of information and knowledge sharing, relying on procedures, other colleagues and internal documentation as information sources. The participants also indicated a high level of agreement in respect to the value of available subject matter experts as information-sharing enablers.Practical implicationsOrganisations should aim to create opportunities for adequate time to share information and organisational structures, facilitating an overall organisational culture of sharing. A focus on information sharing through forums, seminars, meetings and working groups could enhance information sharing, through the development of communities of practice.Social implicationsPharmaceutical professionals relied on trustworthiness and quality as professional' top information source-influencing factors. Furthermore, the study demonstrated that working within a high-performance, target-driven and time-constrained production environment brings a particular contextual impact, where frequent urgent information triggers are experienced. These contextual factors warrant further investigation.Originality/valueA paucity of information exists with respect to the ISB of professionals, working within the pharmaceutical manufacturing sector, which is a sector known for its high level of information use and production. This paper offered an original empirical investigation of the ISB of professionals, working within the pharmaceutical manufacturing sector in the Republic of Ireland, focussing on key professional tasks. The research also addressed the level of support available for knowledge and information sharing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对在爱尔兰药品制造部门工作的专业人员寻求信息行为的调查
目的本研究旨在调查爱尔兰共和国制药行业不同专业群体的信息寻求行为(ISB)和信息需求(即获取信息的目的),专业团体使用的信息来源(包括内部文件、法规、行业指南、标准和同事)以及影响专业团体选择信息来源的因素。此外,该研究探讨了对知识和信息共享的支持程度。设计/方法论/方法一种定量的非实验性研究设计,包括一份自我完成调查问卷,用于检查许多信息寻求变量:信息触发因素、信息来源和来源影响因素以及信息共享促成因素。它涉及四项专业任务:工艺技术/工艺开发、监管支持以及质量/合规支持和工程。发现这项研究为在高度监管和高性能生产环境中工作的制药专业人员的ISB提供了新的见解,包括更好地了解专业群体经历信息需求的背景。观察到的与员工对信息共享推动者的看法有关的一致程度表明,信息共享总体上处于积极水平。研究局限性/含义该研究指出,这在很大程度上呼应了之前的研究结果,即与个人工作角色相关的任务会引发特定的信息需求。除此之外,与工作角色相关的任务对信息源的选择也有影响。制药专业人员依靠程序、其他同事和内部文件作为信息来源,积极参与信息和知识共享。与会者还表示,对现有主题专家作为信息共享推动者的价值达成了高度一致。实际含义组织应致力于创造足够的时间共享信息和组织结构的机会,促进整体的共享组织文化。通过论坛、研讨会、会议和工作组注重信息共享,可以通过发展实践社区来加强信息共享。社会影响制药专业人员依赖可信度和质量作为专业人员的首要信息来源影响因素。此外,该研究表明,在高性能、目标驱动和时间限制的生产环境中工作会带来特定的背景影响,在这种环境中,频繁出现紧急信息触发。这些背景因素值得进一步调查。原创性/价值在制药行业工作的专业人员的ISB信息匮乏,制药行业以其高水平的信息使用和生产而闻名。本文对爱尔兰共和国制药行业的专业人员的ISB进行了原始的实证调查,重点是关键的专业任务。该研究还谈到了可用于知识和信息共享的支持水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Library Management
Library Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: ■strategic management ■HRM/HRO ■cultural diversity ■information use ■managing change ■quality management ■leadership ■teamwork ■marketing ■outsourcing ■automation ■library finance ■charging ■performance measurement ■data protection and copyright As information services become more complex in nature and more technologically sophisticated, managers need to keep pace with innovations and thinking in the field to offer the most professional service with the resources they have.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the library quality assurance system in supporting international accreditation of department at Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia Digitalization for enhancing reading habits: the improved hybrid book recommendation system with genre-oriented profiles Overwhelming effects of COVID-19 on public library services and recovery perspectives Evaluating the impact of LIS continuing professional development programmes: a survey of university libraries in Northern India User perceptions of ICT-based library services in the universities of Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1