Executive Function and Planning Features of Students With Different Types of Learning Difficulties in Chinese Junior Middle School

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Learning Disability Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-06-19 DOI:10.1177/0731948720929006
Meiqi Deng, D. Cai, Xuan Zhou, A. Leung
{"title":"Executive Function and Planning Features of Students With Different Types of Learning Difficulties in Chinese Junior Middle School","authors":"Meiqi Deng, D. Cai, Xuan Zhou, A. Leung","doi":"10.1177/0731948720929006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present study was to investigate the executive function and planning features of students with different types of learning difficulties. Students with mathematics difficulty (MD; n = 17), reading difficulty (RD; n = 12), and their commonalities (MDRD; n = 22), along with typically academically developing peers (TD; n = 22), were evaluated on an array of cognitive measures (working memory, inhibition, and planning) individually. Results revealed significant differences among groups on various cognitive measures. Students in the MD, RD, and MDRD groups showed poorer performance compared to the TD group on all of the working memory, inhibition, and planning tasks. The MDRD group showed an overall weakness when compared to other groups, indicating severe cognitive deficits in students with MDRD. The RD group showed deficits in inhibition and planning on tasks requiring verbal skills; MD students showed deficits in inhibition and planning on digit-related tasks. However, no salient difference was found among the MD, RD, and TD groups on working memory. Results have implications for understanding the cognitive features of MD, RD, and MDRD. Intervention programs targeting inhibition and planning may be beneficial for improving reading and mathematics achievement in students with learning difficulties.","PeriodicalId":47365,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disability Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0731948720929006","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disability Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720929006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the executive function and planning features of students with different types of learning difficulties. Students with mathematics difficulty (MD; n = 17), reading difficulty (RD; n = 12), and their commonalities (MDRD; n = 22), along with typically academically developing peers (TD; n = 22), were evaluated on an array of cognitive measures (working memory, inhibition, and planning) individually. Results revealed significant differences among groups on various cognitive measures. Students in the MD, RD, and MDRD groups showed poorer performance compared to the TD group on all of the working memory, inhibition, and planning tasks. The MDRD group showed an overall weakness when compared to other groups, indicating severe cognitive deficits in students with MDRD. The RD group showed deficits in inhibition and planning on tasks requiring verbal skills; MD students showed deficits in inhibition and planning on digit-related tasks. However, no salient difference was found among the MD, RD, and TD groups on working memory. Results have implications for understanding the cognitive features of MD, RD, and MDRD. Intervention programs targeting inhibition and planning may be beneficial for improving reading and mathematics achievement in students with learning difficulties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国初中不同类型学习困难学生的执行功能与计划特征
本研究的目的是调查不同类型学习困难学生的执行功能和计划特征。对有数学困难(MD;n=17)、阅读困难(RD;n=12)及其共性(MDRD;n=22)的学生,以及典型的学业发展同龄人(TD;n=22。结果显示,各组在各种认知测量方面存在显著差异。与TD组相比,MD、RD和MDRD组的学生在所有工作记忆、抑制和计划任务方面表现较差。与其他组相比,MDRD组表现出整体较弱,表明患有MDRD的学生存在严重的认知缺陷。RD组在对需要言语技能的任务的抑制和计划方面表现出缺陷;医学博士生在数字相关任务的抑制和计划方面表现出缺陷。然而,MD、RD和TD组在工作记忆方面没有发现显著差异。研究结果对理解MD、RD和MDRD的认知特征具有启示意义。针对抑制和计划的干预计划可能有助于提高学习困难学生的阅读和数学成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Learning Disability Quarterly publishes high-quality research and scholarship concerning children, youth, and adults with learning disabilities. Consistent with that purpose, the journal seeks to publish articles with the potential to impact and improve educational outcomes, opportunities, and services.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Phonological Decoding on the Reading Skills of Beginning Readers With Reading Disabilities in a Highly Transparent Orthography The Effects of a Morphological Awareness Intervention on Reading and Spelling Ability of Children With Dyslexia Synthesis of Writing Intervention Studies for English Learners With Learning Disabilities Parental Allyship for Children With Dyslexia: A Conceptual Lens on Disability Experience Current Research Informing the Conceptualization of STEM Interventions for Students With LD: An Introduction to the Special Series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1