Biofuel technologies: Lessons learned and pathways to decarbonization

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY Global Change Biology Bioenergy Pub Date : 2023-08-21 DOI:10.1111/gcbb.13091
Heitor Cantarella, Jean Felipe Leal Silva, Luiz Augusto Horta Nogueira, Rubens Maciel Filho, Raffaella Rossetto, Tomas Ekbom, Glaucia Mendes Souza, Franziska Mueller-Langer
{"title":"Biofuel technologies: Lessons learned and pathways to decarbonization","authors":"Heitor Cantarella,&nbsp;Jean Felipe Leal Silva,&nbsp;Luiz Augusto Horta Nogueira,&nbsp;Rubens Maciel Filho,&nbsp;Raffaella Rossetto,&nbsp;Tomas Ekbom,&nbsp;Glaucia Mendes Souza,&nbsp;Franziska Mueller-Langer","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.13091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This Opinion highlights several successful cases of biofuel technologies recently described by the IEA Bioenergy Intertask Report on Lessons Learned. The report discussed the potential of biofuels to contribute to a significant market supply, thus replacing fossil fuels and mitigating global warming, and it underscores the challenges in expanding biofuel production and replicating successful models between countries and regions. Based on the lessons learned from conventional, established technologies, the authors analyzed policies, feedstocks, products, technologies, economics, environmental concerns, social aspects, scalability, and ease of implementation and replication in different countries or regions. There are blending mandates in place around the world to foster the use of biofuels. Dependence on the availability and price fluctuations of crop feedstocks may limit biofuel production in certain circumstances. Legal restrictions on using food crops as feedstocks present obstacles to scaling up production. Temporary constraints related to feedstock costs and availability, as evidenced by changes and postponements of biofuel blending mandates in various countries (particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic) also pose challenges. Technological hurdles exist for advanced biofuels that implicate premium pricing. Still, 2G ethanol from sugarcane meets very strict feedstock requirements with a carbon footprint so low that only electric vehicles charged in Norway could have life-cycle GHG emissions at the same level as a 2G ethanol-fueled combustion engine car. The authors evaluate whether and how much electrification could contribute to advance the decarbonization efforts in different countries. Drawing from these observations, the authors express their viewpoints to assist researchers and policymakers in the energy sector in formulating viable approaches to combat the climate crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"15 10","pages":"1190-1203"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.13091","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.13091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This Opinion highlights several successful cases of biofuel technologies recently described by the IEA Bioenergy Intertask Report on Lessons Learned. The report discussed the potential of biofuels to contribute to a significant market supply, thus replacing fossil fuels and mitigating global warming, and it underscores the challenges in expanding biofuel production and replicating successful models between countries and regions. Based on the lessons learned from conventional, established technologies, the authors analyzed policies, feedstocks, products, technologies, economics, environmental concerns, social aspects, scalability, and ease of implementation and replication in different countries or regions. There are blending mandates in place around the world to foster the use of biofuels. Dependence on the availability and price fluctuations of crop feedstocks may limit biofuel production in certain circumstances. Legal restrictions on using food crops as feedstocks present obstacles to scaling up production. Temporary constraints related to feedstock costs and availability, as evidenced by changes and postponements of biofuel blending mandates in various countries (particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic) also pose challenges. Technological hurdles exist for advanced biofuels that implicate premium pricing. Still, 2G ethanol from sugarcane meets very strict feedstock requirements with a carbon footprint so low that only electric vehicles charged in Norway could have life-cycle GHG emissions at the same level as a 2G ethanol-fueled combustion engine car. The authors evaluate whether and how much electrification could contribute to advance the decarbonization efforts in different countries. Drawing from these observations, the authors express their viewpoints to assist researchers and policymakers in the energy sector in formulating viable approaches to combat the climate crisis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物燃料技术:经验教训和脱碳途径
本意见重点介绍了国际能源机构《生物能源任务间经验教训报告》最近描述的几个生物燃料技术的成功案例。该报告讨论了生物燃料在替代化石燃料和减缓全球变暖方面的潜力,并强调了扩大生物燃料生产和在国家和地区之间复制成功模式所面临的挑战。根据从传统成熟技术中吸取的经验教训,作者分析了不同国家或地区的政策、原料、产品、技术、经济、环境问题、社会方面、可扩展性以及实施和复制的便利性。世界各地都有促进生物燃料使用的混合指令。在某些情况下,对作物原料供应和价格波动的依赖可能会限制生物燃料的生产。使用粮食作物作为原料的法律限制对扩大生产构成障碍。原料成本和可用性方面的临时限制也带来了挑战,各国(特别是在COVID - 19大流行期间)生物燃料混合任务的变化和推迟证明了这一点。先进生物燃料存在技术障碍,这涉及到溢价定价。尽管如此,从甘蔗中提取的2G乙醇满足了非常严格的原料要求,而且碳足迹非常低,以至于在挪威只有充电的电动汽车的生命周期温室气体排放量与2G乙醇燃料的内燃机汽车相同。作者评估了电气化是否以及在多大程度上有助于推动不同国家的脱碳努力。根据这些观察结果,作者表达了他们的观点,以帮助能源部门的研究人员和政策制定者制定应对气候危机的可行方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
期刊最新文献
Managing Soil Carbon Sequestration: Assessing the Effects of Intermediate Crops, Crop Residue Removal, and Digestate Application on Swedish Arable Land A New Enzyme for Biodiesel Production and Food Applications: Lipase of Bacillus megaterium F25 Isolated From an Aquatic Insect Rhantus suturalis Advanced Biofuel Value Chains Sourced by New Cropping Systems With Low iLUC Risk Displacement Factors for Aerosol Emissions From Alternative Forest Biomass Use Moderate Drought Constrains Crop Growth Without Altering Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics in Perennial Cup-Plant and Silage Maize
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1