Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Plagiarism by Undergraduate Healthcare Science in Gauteng

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice Pub Date : 2023-08-16 DOI:10.53761/1.20.6.4
Nontembiso Magida, Kyla Cross, Khanyisa Baloyi, Tatum Mitrovich, Lavender Muyengwa, Perseverence Mupambirei, Marizaan Van Der Mescht, M. Graham
{"title":"Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Plagiarism by Undergraduate Healthcare Science in Gauteng","authors":"Nontembiso Magida, Kyla Cross, Khanyisa Baloyi, Tatum Mitrovich, Lavender Muyengwa, Perseverence Mupambirei, Marizaan Van Der Mescht, M. Graham","doi":"10.53761/1.20.6.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plagiarism is a growing concern in Healthcare Sciences in the current digital era. Plagiarism threatens institutions’ integrity and academic reputation; therefore, it is essential to understand all contributing factors to eradicate unethical practices effectively. The study aimed to establish the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of plagiarism among Healthcare Science students at a selected higher education institution in Gauteng. A cross-sectional study was used, with a total population of 803 second to fourth-year students from the School of Healthcare Sciences, and 83 students completing the survey. Ethical clearance and approval (617/2021) were obtained from the ethics and research committee of a selected higher educational institution in Gauteng. An adapted Likert scale self-reported questionnaire was sent via a Google form link to the teaching platform with the consent form embedded. The statistical Package for Social Science was used to analyse demographic data descriptively, and Spearman’s rho test determined the correlation between study variables. Most students were female (94.0%) and non-native English speakers (71.1%). The majority (83.1%) of the students reported understanding the instances of plagiarism; however, approximately one-third (36.1%) were unable to identify specific instances correctly. Just over half (56.6%) of the students felt self-plagiarism should not be punishable. The correlation between the knowledge of plagiarism and negative attitudes towards plagiarism was found to be statistically significant (p=0.009). The results demonstrated low practice of plagiarism, possibly due to a lack of self-awareness. Therefore, continuous in-depth education on plagiarism and improved policies should be fostered to promote the integrity of future healthcare professionals.","PeriodicalId":45764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.6.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plagiarism is a growing concern in Healthcare Sciences in the current digital era. Plagiarism threatens institutions’ integrity and academic reputation; therefore, it is essential to understand all contributing factors to eradicate unethical practices effectively. The study aimed to establish the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of plagiarism among Healthcare Science students at a selected higher education institution in Gauteng. A cross-sectional study was used, with a total population of 803 second to fourth-year students from the School of Healthcare Sciences, and 83 students completing the survey. Ethical clearance and approval (617/2021) were obtained from the ethics and research committee of a selected higher educational institution in Gauteng. An adapted Likert scale self-reported questionnaire was sent via a Google form link to the teaching platform with the consent form embedded. The statistical Package for Social Science was used to analyse demographic data descriptively, and Spearman’s rho test determined the correlation between study variables. Most students were female (94.0%) and non-native English speakers (71.1%). The majority (83.1%) of the students reported understanding the instances of plagiarism; however, approximately one-third (36.1%) were unable to identify specific instances correctly. Just over half (56.6%) of the students felt self-plagiarism should not be punishable. The correlation between the knowledge of plagiarism and negative attitudes towards plagiarism was found to be statistically significant (p=0.009). The results demonstrated low practice of plagiarism, possibly due to a lack of self-awareness. Therefore, continuous in-depth education on plagiarism and improved policies should be fostered to promote the integrity of future healthcare professionals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
豪登省本科医疗科学抄袭的知识、态度和实践
在当今的数字时代,抄袭是医疗保健科学领域日益受到关注的问题。剽窃威胁着机构的诚信和学术声誉;因此,必须了解所有促成因素,以有效地根除不道德的做法。本研究旨在确定豪登省某高等教育机构保健科学专业学生的剽窃知识、态度和做法。采用横断面研究,共有803名来自卫生保健科学学院的二年级至四年级学生,83名学生完成了调查。从豪登省一所选定的高等教育机构的伦理和研究委员会获得了伦理许可和批准(617/2021)。一份改编的李克特量表自我报告问卷通过谷歌表格链接发送到教学平台,并嵌入同意书。使用社会科学统计软件包对人口统计数据进行描述性分析,并使用Spearman 's rho检验确定研究变量之间的相关性。大多数学生为女性(94.0%)和非英语母语者(71.1%)。大多数(83.1%)的学生表示了解抄袭的情况;然而,大约三分之一(36.1%)的人无法正确识别特定的实例。超过一半(56.6%)的学生认为自我抄袭不应该受到惩罚。对抄袭的认知与对抄袭的消极态度之间的相关性有统计学意义(p=0.009)。结果显示,剽窃行为很少,可能是由于缺乏自我意识。因此,应该对抄袭进行持续深入的教育,并改进政策,以促进未来医疗保健专业人员的诚信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice aims to add significantly to the body of knowledge describing effective and innovative teaching and learning practice in higher education.The Journal is a forum for educational practitioners across a wide range of disciplines. Its purpose is to facilitate the communication of teaching and learning outcomes in a scholarly way, bridging the gap between journals covering purely academic research and articles and opinions published without peer review.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Intensive modes of teaching, past, present, and future Editorial: More Practical Gender Research is Needed in Higher Education Leadership and Management What Exactly is Peer Learning? An Exploratory Analysis of Student Class Interaction Reframing Professional Identity: Professional Development Framework for Learning/Educational Designers Perceptions and Experiences of Academic Advisers and Minoritised Students at a UK University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1