Comparative analysis of methods for forecasting bankruptcies of Russian construction companies

A. Karminsky, Roman Burekhin
{"title":"Comparative analysis of methods for forecasting bankruptcies of Russian construction companies","authors":"A. Karminsky, Roman Burekhin","doi":"10.17323/1998-0663.2019.3.52.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is devoted to comparison of the capabilities of various methods to predict the bankruptcy of construction industry companies on a one-year horizon. The authors considered the following algorithms: logit and probit models, classification trees, random forests, artificial neural networks. Special attention was paid to the peculiarities of the training machine learning models, the impact of data imbalance on the predictive ability of models, analysis of ways to deal with these imbalances and analysis of the influence of non-financial factors on the predictive ability of models. In their study, the authors used non-financial and financial indicators calculated on the basis of public financial statements of the construction companies for the period from 2011 to 2017. The authors concluded that the models considered show acceptable quality for use in forecasting bankruptcy problems. The Gini or AUC coefficient (area under the ROC curve) was used as the quality markers of the model. It was revealed that neural networks outperform other methods in predictive power, while logistic regression models in combination with discretization follow them closely. It was found that the effective way to deal with the imbalance data depends on the type of model used. However, no significant impact on the imbalance in the training set predictive ability of the model was identified. The significant impact of non-financial indicators on the likelihood of bankruptcy was not confirmed.","PeriodicalId":41920,"journal":{"name":"Biznes Informatika-Business Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biznes Informatika-Business Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1998-0663.2019.3.52.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This paper is devoted to comparison of the capabilities of various methods to predict the bankruptcy of construction industry companies on a one-year horizon. The authors considered the following algorithms: logit and probit models, classification trees, random forests, artificial neural networks. Special attention was paid to the peculiarities of the training machine learning models, the impact of data imbalance on the predictive ability of models, analysis of ways to deal with these imbalances and analysis of the influence of non-financial factors on the predictive ability of models. In their study, the authors used non-financial and financial indicators calculated on the basis of public financial statements of the construction companies for the period from 2011 to 2017. The authors concluded that the models considered show acceptable quality for use in forecasting bankruptcy problems. The Gini or AUC coefficient (area under the ROC curve) was used as the quality markers of the model. It was revealed that neural networks outperform other methods in predictive power, while logistic regression models in combination with discretization follow them closely. It was found that the effective way to deal with the imbalance data depends on the type of model used. However, no significant impact on the imbalance in the training set predictive ability of the model was identified. The significant impact of non-financial indicators on the likelihood of bankruptcy was not confirmed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯建筑公司破产预测方法的比较分析
本文旨在比较各种方法在一年的时间跨度内预测建筑业公司破产的能力。作者考虑了以下算法:logit和probit模型、分类树、随机森林、人工神经网络。特别关注训练机器学习模型的特性,数据不平衡对模型预测能力的影响,分析处理这些不平衡的方法以及分析非财务因素对模型预测能力的影响。在他们的研究中,作者使用了非财务指标和财务指标,这些指标是根据建筑公司2011年至2017年的公开财务报表计算出来的。作者的结论是,所考虑的模型在预测破产问题方面表现出可接受的质量。采用基尼系数或AUC系数(ROC曲线下面积)作为模型的质量标志。结果表明,神经网络在预测能力上优于其他方法,而与离散化相结合的逻辑回归模型紧随其后。研究发现,处理不平衡数据的有效方法取决于所使用的模型类型。然而,不平衡对模型的训练集预测能力没有显著影响。非财务指标对破产可能性的重大影响尚未得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling and optimization of strategies for making individual decisions in multi-agent socio-economic systems with the use of machine learning An intelligent method for generating a list of job profile requirements based on neural network language models using ESCO taxonomy and online job corpus Decision support technology for a seller on a marketplace in a competitive environment The present and future of the digital transformation of real estate: A systematic review of smart real estate A knowledge management system in the strategic development of universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1