Comparison of three prognostic and predictive scores in 10 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia caused by nosocomial infection

Yu Kijima , Tomokazu Shimizu , Hiroshi Toma , Shoichi Iida , Masashi Inui , Toshio Takagi
{"title":"Comparison of three prognostic and predictive scores in 10 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia caused by nosocomial infection","authors":"Yu Kijima ,&nbsp;Tomokazu Shimizu ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Toma ,&nbsp;Shoichi Iida ,&nbsp;Masashi Inui ,&nbsp;Toshio Takagi","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpsp.2023.100376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>A nosocomial outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) occurred in the Toda Chuo General Hospital in Toda City, Saitama Prefecture, Japan in December 2020. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of three prognostic indices for predicting the outcome of COVID-19 in patents with COVID-19 pneumonia.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>Patients in the Department of Urology and Transplant Surgery at Toda Chuo General Hospital with nosocomially acquired COVID-19 confirmed by a positive polymerase chain reaction test were included in the study. We used the COVID-GRAM, International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium’s World Health Organization 4C Mortality Score, and COVID-19 Registry Japan to independently predict the prognoses of 10 patients and identify common prognostic factors. All three indices include age, dyspnea, and comorbidities as prognostic factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ten patients were included in the study, of which two patients died. According to the COVID-GRAM both patients were “high risk,” whereas the 4C Mortality Score predicted “high risk” and “very high risk.”</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The prognostic scores of all three indices were useful for predicting illness severity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36921,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Clinica Practica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Clinica Practica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603924923000149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

A nosocomial outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) occurred in the Toda Chuo General Hospital in Toda City, Saitama Prefecture, Japan in December 2020. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of three prognostic indices for predicting the outcome of COVID-19 in patents with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Patients and methods

Patients in the Department of Urology and Transplant Surgery at Toda Chuo General Hospital with nosocomially acquired COVID-19 confirmed by a positive polymerase chain reaction test were included in the study. We used the COVID-GRAM, International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium’s World Health Organization 4C Mortality Score, and COVID-19 Registry Japan to independently predict the prognoses of 10 patients and identify common prognostic factors. All three indices include age, dyspnea, and comorbidities as prognostic factors.

Results

Ten patients were included in the study, of which two patients died. According to the COVID-GRAM both patients were “high risk,” whereas the 4C Mortality Score predicted “high risk” and “very high risk.”

Conclusion

The prognostic scores of all three indices were useful for predicting illness severity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
10例医院感染新冠肺炎肺炎患者三种预后和预测评分的比较
简介2020年12月,日本Saitama县Toda市Toda Chuo综合医院发生了一起医院爆发的冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)。本研究的目的是比较三种预后指标预测新冠肺炎肺炎患者COVID-19]预后的准确性。患者和方法将Toda Chuo综合医院泌尿外科和移植外科的患者纳入研究,这些患者经聚合酶链式反应检测呈阳性,经医院感染新冠肺炎。我们使用COVID-GRAM、国际严重急性呼吸道和新发感染联合会的世界卫生组织4C死亡率评分和新冠肺炎日本注册中心独立预测了10名患者的预后,并确定了常见的预后因素。这三个指标都包括年龄、呼吸困难和合并症作为预后因素。结果本研究共纳入10例患者,其中2例死亡。根据COVID-GRAM,两名患者都是“高风险”,而4C死亡率评分预测的是“高”和“非常高的风险”。结论所有三个指标的预后评分都有助于预测疾病的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina Clinica Practica
Medicina Clinica Practica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
43 days
期刊最新文献
Improving the quality of primary healthcare in Kosovo: Impact of targeted training of Quality Coordinators Lesiones por animal ponzoñoso, raya de agua dulce: serie de casos Inicio del síndrome de Sjögren con manifestaciones extraglandulares: reporte de caso Evolución del paciente hospitalizado con gripe durante 2016–2020 según su estado vacunal Lyme disease: An ultrastructural analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1