The Blackademic Life: Academic Fiction, Higher Education, and the Black Intellectual by Lavelle Porter (review)

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1353/afa.2022.0014
Stephanie Brown
{"title":"The Blackademic Life: Academic Fiction, Higher Education, and the Black Intellectual by Lavelle Porter (review)","authors":"Stephanie Brown","doi":"10.1353/afa.2022.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"tactics of Afrofuturism to propel Black militants toward a final, “flawless victory, a bloodless revolution” (184). Lavender poignantly centers a key aspect of Afrofuturism—what he calls “the hope impulse”—as an animating force behind all African American literature from the very first narratives of enslaved people to Black cultural productions of the present day. However, to say that African American literature is Afrofuturist because it is hopeful, as Lavender constantly does throughout the book, is somewhat reductive. Lavender’s other critical terms, such as “the transhistorical feedback loop” and “networked consciousness,” also work against his analysis at times by shoehorning the texts into predetermined conclusions rather than considering their individual nuances. However, the book’s missteps are all in the service of building up Afrofuturism not just as an aesthetic but also as an analytic in which “finding the future in the past should be a core tenet” (112). In this way, Lavender’s work complements the recent scholarship of Kara Keeling (2019), Sami Schalk (2018), and Ytasha Womack (2013) by providing their objects of analysis with an origin story deeply rooted in the world of the Americas. Although Lavender’s analysis does not always live up to his aspirations, he opens a discussion about the wider applicability of Afrofuturism as a reading practice that has its own history beyond the 1993 coinage of the word and its 1970s ur-texts. Like Sun Ra, who claimed to be “on the other side of time,” Afrofuturism Rising makes a bold claim for the Black experience as unbounded by linear time.","PeriodicalId":44779,"journal":{"name":"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/afa.2022.0014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

tactics of Afrofuturism to propel Black militants toward a final, “flawless victory, a bloodless revolution” (184). Lavender poignantly centers a key aspect of Afrofuturism—what he calls “the hope impulse”—as an animating force behind all African American literature from the very first narratives of enslaved people to Black cultural productions of the present day. However, to say that African American literature is Afrofuturist because it is hopeful, as Lavender constantly does throughout the book, is somewhat reductive. Lavender’s other critical terms, such as “the transhistorical feedback loop” and “networked consciousness,” also work against his analysis at times by shoehorning the texts into predetermined conclusions rather than considering their individual nuances. However, the book’s missteps are all in the service of building up Afrofuturism not just as an aesthetic but also as an analytic in which “finding the future in the past should be a core tenet” (112). In this way, Lavender’s work complements the recent scholarship of Kara Keeling (2019), Sami Schalk (2018), and Ytasha Womack (2013) by providing their objects of analysis with an origin story deeply rooted in the world of the Americas. Although Lavender’s analysis does not always live up to his aspirations, he opens a discussion about the wider applicability of Afrofuturism as a reading practice that has its own history beyond the 1993 coinage of the word and its 1970s ur-texts. Like Sun Ra, who claimed to be “on the other side of time,” Afrofuturism Rising makes a bold claim for the Black experience as unbounded by linear time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《黑人学术生活:学术小说、高等教育与黑人知识分子》作者:拉维尔·波特
阿福鲁图主义的策略,以推动黑人激进分子走向最后的,“完美的胜利,一场不流血的革命”(184)。拉文德尖锐地集中了非洲主义的一个关键方面——他称之为“希望冲动”——作为所有非裔美国文学背后的一股活跃力量,从最早的奴隶叙事到当今的黑人文化作品。然而,要说非裔美国文学是非洲主义的,因为它充满希望,就像拉文德在整本书中不断做的那样,有点言过其实。拉文德的其他批评术语,如“跨历史反馈回路”和“网络意识”,有时也会通过将文本硬塞进预先确定的结论中,而不是考虑它们各自的细微差别来反对他的分析。然而,这本书的失误都是为了建立非洲主义,不仅是一种美学,也是一种分析,其中“在过去寻找未来应该是一个核心原则”(112)。通过这种方式,Lavender的作品补充了Kara Keeling(2019)、Sami Schalk(2018)和Ytasha Womack(2013)最近的学术成果,为他们的分析对象提供了一个深深植根于美洲世界的起源故事。尽管拉文德的分析并不总是符合他的愿望,但他开启了一场关于非洲文化主义作为一种阅读实践的更广泛适用性的讨论,这种阅读实践在1993年这个词的产生及其20世纪70年代的ur文本之后有着自己的历史。就像自称“在时间的另一边”的孙拉一样,“非洲之旅崛起”大胆地宣称黑人的体验是不受线性时间限制的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW
AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the Division on Black American Literature and Culture of the Modern Language Association, the quarterly journal African American Review promotes a lively exchange among writers and scholars in the arts, humanities, and social sciences who hold diverse perspectives on African American literature and culture. Between 1967 and 1976, the journal appeared under the title Negro American Literature Forum and for the next fifteen years was titled Black American Literature Forum. In 1992, African American Review changed its name for a third time and expanded its mission to include the study of a broader array of cultural formations.
期刊最新文献
Fighting for the Higher Law: Black and White Transcendentalists against Slavery by Peter Wirzbicki (review) Ralph Ellison: Photographer by Michal Raz-Russo and John F. Callahan (review) I remember My Girl Is a Trip Prospect.5 New Orleans: Yesterday We Said Tomorrow by Naima J. Keith and Diana Nawi (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1