The Effect of Scaffolding Technique in Teaching Writing of Recount Text at SMK Pembangunan Bukittinggi

ELTALL Pub Date : 2022-03-20 DOI:10.21154/eltall.v3i1.3228
Novia Shinta
{"title":"The Effect of Scaffolding Technique in Teaching Writing of Recount Text at SMK Pembangunan Bukittinggi","authors":"Novia Shinta","doi":"10.21154/eltall.v3i1.3228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This   research was   aimed to know the   effect    of    using   scaffolding Technique in teaching writing of recount text at first of SMK Pembangunan. The method used in this research was a quantitative method. To attain the reliability of the test instrument, the researcher used rubric of scoring namely an analytic scoring which was adopted from John Anderson to score the students’ writing on the pre-test and the post-test. To analyze the data the researcher used t-test formula and consulted the result into t-table with the level of significance α = 0.05. The research findings showed that the result of the pre-test and post-test score of the experimental class tₒ (-7,578) was higher than t table (1.717). Hₒ was rejected and Hₐ was accepted. It means that there is a significant effect of using  Scaffolding  Technique  in  teaching  writing  of  recount  text.  Then, the calculation of the post-test both classes: was experimental class and control class, it was obtained that the tₒ (8,307) was higher than the t table () with a degree of freedom  (DF) = 22.  So, the alternative hypothesis (Hₐ) were accepted, which means that there is a significant difference between using scaffolding technique and conventional.  It can be concluded that the hypothesis is accepted. It is proved that using Scaffolding Technique can help the students in improving their ability in writing recount text.","PeriodicalId":34512,"journal":{"name":"ELTALL","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELTALL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21154/eltall.v3i1.3228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This   research was   aimed to know the   effect    of    using   scaffolding Technique in teaching writing of recount text at first of SMK Pembangunan. The method used in this research was a quantitative method. To attain the reliability of the test instrument, the researcher used rubric of scoring namely an analytic scoring which was adopted from John Anderson to score the students’ writing on the pre-test and the post-test. To analyze the data the researcher used t-test formula and consulted the result into t-table with the level of significance α = 0.05. The research findings showed that the result of the pre-test and post-test score of the experimental class tₒ (-7,578) was higher than t table (1.717). Hₒ was rejected and Hₐ was accepted. It means that there is a significant effect of using  Scaffolding  Technique  in  teaching  writing  of  recount  text.  Then, the calculation of the post-test both classes: was experimental class and control class, it was obtained that the tₒ (8,307) was higher than the t table () with a degree of freedom  (DF) = 22.  So, the alternative hypothesis (Hₐ) were accepted, which means that there is a significant difference between using scaffolding technique and conventional.  It can be concluded that the hypothesis is accepted. It is proved that using Scaffolding Technique can help the students in improving their ability in writing recount text.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
搭架技术在SMK《彭班古南武吉亭记》叙述文写作教学中的效果
本研究旨在了解脚手架技术在SMK Pembagunan小学复述课文写作教学中的应用效果。本研究中使用的方法是一种定量方法。为了达到测试工具的可靠性,研究人员使用了John Anderson的评分标准,即分析评分法,对学生在测试前和测试后的写作进行评分。为了分析数据,研究人员使用了t检验公式,并将结果查阅到显著性水平为α=0.05的t表中ₒ(7578)高于t表(1.717)ₒ 被拒绝,Hₐ已被接受。这意味着支架技术在复述文本写作教学中有着显著的效果。然后,对实验班和对照班的后测两个班进行计算,得出tₒ(8307)高于t表(),自由度(DF)=22。因此,替代假设(Hₐ)被接受,这意味着使用脚手架技术和传统技术之间有显著差异。可以得出结论,这个假设是可以接受的。实践证明,运用支架技术可以帮助学生提高复述文本的写作能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Adaptive Blended Learning in English Language Teaching Textbook Analysis of "Grow with English Book 1" TEACHERS' PERCEPTION ON ONLINE LEARNING OF ENGLISH FOREIGN LANGUAGE IN THE POST COVID-19 PANDEMIC The Effectiveness of Using Advertisement to Improve Students’ Writing Skill Metaphorical Expression used in Poetry in book "The Everyday Poet" by Deborah Alma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1