Canadian Consumer Preferences Regarding Gene-Edited Food Products

IF 4.9 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Frontiers in genome editing Pub Date : 2022-04-11 DOI:10.3389/fgeed.2022.854334
Oswaldo Vasquez, Hayley Hesseln, S. Smyth
{"title":"Canadian Consumer Preferences Regarding Gene-Edited Food Products","authors":"Oswaldo Vasquez, Hayley Hesseln, S. Smyth","doi":"10.3389/fgeed.2022.854334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovations in food production and processing have largely remained “behind the scenes” for decades. The current nature of social media and calls for increased transparency regarding food results in a new landscape where consumer product demands are more important than ever, but are increasingly based on limited, or incorrect, information. One area where consumer awareness is rapidly emerging is the area of gene-edited food products. This article uses a consumer survey to gather perceptions regarding food safety, gene editing and willingness to consume for three gene-edited food products. Four factors were found to strongly influence consumer perceptions: trust in the Canadian food safety system; food technology neophobia scores; knowledge of genetics; and self-knowledge of gene editing. The survey of 497 Canadians found that 15% identified as neophobics and 12% as neophilics. The majority of participants identified as neutral. When presented with various food values, participants indicated that nutrition, price, and taste were the three most important values. A participants’ willingness to consume gene-edited food products strongly correlated with neophobic and neophilic preferences, with neophobics unwilling to consume and neophilics being uncertain. The only food value that strongly affects consumer willingness to consume is the environmental impact of a products’ production. Canadian consumers have a moderate to high level of trust in Canada’s food safety system, but this level of trust fails to carry over to food products produced through innovative technologies; however, consumers express a higher level of trust in gene-edited technology than genetically modified technology.","PeriodicalId":73086,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in genome editing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in genome editing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2022.854334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Innovations in food production and processing have largely remained “behind the scenes” for decades. The current nature of social media and calls for increased transparency regarding food results in a new landscape where consumer product demands are more important than ever, but are increasingly based on limited, or incorrect, information. One area where consumer awareness is rapidly emerging is the area of gene-edited food products. This article uses a consumer survey to gather perceptions regarding food safety, gene editing and willingness to consume for three gene-edited food products. Four factors were found to strongly influence consumer perceptions: trust in the Canadian food safety system; food technology neophobia scores; knowledge of genetics; and self-knowledge of gene editing. The survey of 497 Canadians found that 15% identified as neophobics and 12% as neophilics. The majority of participants identified as neutral. When presented with various food values, participants indicated that nutrition, price, and taste were the three most important values. A participants’ willingness to consume gene-edited food products strongly correlated with neophobic and neophilic preferences, with neophobics unwilling to consume and neophilics being uncertain. The only food value that strongly affects consumer willingness to consume is the environmental impact of a products’ production. Canadian consumers have a moderate to high level of trust in Canada’s food safety system, but this level of trust fails to carry over to food products produced through innovative technologies; however, consumers express a higher level of trust in gene-edited technology than genetically modified technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大消费者对基因编辑食品的偏好
几十年来,食品生产和加工方面的创新在很大程度上一直处于“幕后”。目前社会媒体的性质和对食品透明度的要求导致了一个新的局面,即消费者对产品的需求比以往任何时候都更重要,但越来越多地基于有限或不正确的信息。消费者意识迅速提高的一个领域是基因编辑食品领域。本文通过消费者调查来收集对三种基因编辑食品的食品安全、基因编辑和消费意愿的看法。有四个因素对消费者的认知有很大影响:对加拿大食品安全体系的信任;食品技术新恐惧症得分;遗传学知识;以及基因编辑的自我认知。这项对497名加拿大人的调查发现,15%的人被认为是恐新症患者,12%的人被认为是恋新症患者。大多数参与者认为自己是中立的。当看到不同的食物价值时,参与者表示营养、价格和味道是三个最重要的价值。参与者消费基因编辑食品的意愿与新恐惧症和亲新偏好密切相关,新恐惧症不愿意消费,亲新偏好不确定。唯一能强烈影响消费者消费意愿的食品价值是产品生产对环境的影响。加拿大消费者对加拿大的食品安全体系有中等到高度的信任,但这种信任水平未能延续到通过创新技术生产的食品;然而,消费者对基因编辑技术的信任程度高于转基因技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Towards functional maps of non-coding variants in cancer. Beyond the traditional distinctions of genome editing: evaluating a vulnerability framework. Knockout mutation in TaD27 enhances number of productive tillers in hexaploid wheat. Targeting DLBCL by mutation-specific disruption of cancer-driving oncogenes. The potential of HBV cure: an overview of CRISPR-mediated HBV gene disruption.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1