The economics of the Manila Galleon

J. Mejia
{"title":"The economics of the Manila Galleon","authors":"J. Mejia","doi":"10.1108/jcefts-04-2021-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to offer a unified economic interpretation of the existing evidence on the Manila Galleon. It intends to be an introduction to the Manila Galleon for economists curious about long-term patterns in global trade, but who are not experts on economic history.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper jointly presents quantitative and qualitative data to analyze in a critical way the existing work on the Manila Galleon. It proposes a conceptual model from the world-systems approach to reflect on the impact of this trade route. Evidence from two case studies, New Granada and Korea, accompany the model.\n\n\nFindings\nThe paper finds that the Manila Galleon was only possible because of the temporary coincidence of a quite singular set of international circumstances and favorable local market conditions. The paper also finds that, despite its large effects on the global integration of silver markets, the Manila Galleon was a profoundly asymmetric activity that brought minor consequences to most of the world.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis paper shows the importance of additional studies providing systematic quantitative evidence on the Manila Galleon. The long tradition of an archival collection developed by historians offers a huge potential to this line of research. In addition, studies in regions different from Mexico, the Philippines, Spain and China would contribute to a better understanding of the Manila Galleon’s global consequences.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis paper provides a series of reflections useful to think about the future challenges of global trade. These challenges require understanding the transformations that will come from profound technological change, massive reconfigurations of the geopolitical order and transitions in the long-term cycles of commodities. Because of their rare occurrence, these are forces hardly visible in recent history, making it necessary for the existence of long-term points of reference such as the Manila Galleon.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper brings together widespread evidence on the Manila Galleon and provides a unified interpretation of it. This opens the door for audiences who are not experts on the economic history of the period to discuss the topic, allowing them to reflect on its lessons for the modern world.\n","PeriodicalId":44245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcefts-04-2021-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to offer a unified economic interpretation of the existing evidence on the Manila Galleon. It intends to be an introduction to the Manila Galleon for economists curious about long-term patterns in global trade, but who are not experts on economic history. Design/methodology/approach The paper jointly presents quantitative and qualitative data to analyze in a critical way the existing work on the Manila Galleon. It proposes a conceptual model from the world-systems approach to reflect on the impact of this trade route. Evidence from two case studies, New Granada and Korea, accompany the model. Findings The paper finds that the Manila Galleon was only possible because of the temporary coincidence of a quite singular set of international circumstances and favorable local market conditions. The paper also finds that, despite its large effects on the global integration of silver markets, the Manila Galleon was a profoundly asymmetric activity that brought minor consequences to most of the world. Research limitations/implications This paper shows the importance of additional studies providing systematic quantitative evidence on the Manila Galleon. The long tradition of an archival collection developed by historians offers a huge potential to this line of research. In addition, studies in regions different from Mexico, the Philippines, Spain and China would contribute to a better understanding of the Manila Galleon’s global consequences. Practical implications This paper provides a series of reflections useful to think about the future challenges of global trade. These challenges require understanding the transformations that will come from profound technological change, massive reconfigurations of the geopolitical order and transitions in the long-term cycles of commodities. Because of their rare occurrence, these are forces hardly visible in recent history, making it necessary for the existence of long-term points of reference such as the Manila Galleon. Originality/value This paper brings together widespread evidence on the Manila Galleon and provides a unified interpretation of it. This opens the door for audiences who are not experts on the economic history of the period to discuss the topic, allowing them to reflect on its lessons for the modern world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马尼拉大帆船的经济状况
目的本文旨在对马尼拉美术馆的现有证据提供一个统一的经济学解释。它旨在为那些对全球贸易长期模式好奇但不是经济史专家的经济学家介绍马尼拉美术馆。设计/方法论/方法本文联合提供定量和定性数据,以关键的方式分析马尼拉美术馆的现有工作。它提出了一个世界体系方法的概念模型,以反映这条贸易路线的影响。来自新格拉纳达和韩国两个案例研究的证据伴随着该模型。论文发现,马尼拉美术馆之所以有可能,是因为一系列独特的国际环境和有利的当地市场条件的暂时巧合。论文还发现,尽管马尼拉美术馆对白银市场的全球一体化产生了巨大影响,但它是一种严重不对称的活动,给世界大部分地区带来了轻微的后果。研究局限性/含义本文表明了提供马尼拉美术馆系统定量证据的额外研究的重要性。历史学家开发的档案收藏的悠久传统为这一研究领域提供了巨大的潜力。此外,在不同于墨西哥、菲律宾、西班牙和中国的地区进行的研究将有助于更好地了解马尼拉广场的全球影响。实际含义本文提供了一系列有助于思考全球贸易未来挑战的思考。这些挑战需要理解深刻的技术变革、地缘政治秩序的大规模重组以及大宗商品长期周期的转变所带来的变革。由于其罕见,这些力量在近代史上几乎看不到,因此有必要存在马尼拉美术馆等长期参考点。起源/价值本文汇集了关于马尼拉美术馆的广泛证据,并对其进行了统一的解释。这为非这一时期经济史专家的观众打开了讨论这个话题的大门,让他们反思这个话题对现代世界的教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies (JCEFTS) negotiates China''s unique position within the international economy, and its interaction across the globe. From a truly international perspective, the journal publishes both qualitative and quantitative research in all areas of Chinese business and foreign trade, technical economics, business environment and business strategy. JCEFTS publishes high quality research papers, viewpoints, conceptual papers, case studies, literature reviews and general views. Emphasis is placed on the publication of articles which seek to link theory with application, or critically analyse real situations in terms of Chinese economics and business in China, with the objective of identifying good practice in these areas and assisting in the development of more appropriate arrangements for addressing crucial issues of Chinese economics and business. Papers accepted for publication will be double–blind peer-reviewed to ensure academic rigour and integrity.
期刊最新文献
Digital financial inclusion and inclusive development in lower-middle-income countries: the enabling role of institutional quality COVID-19 pandemic and linkage between stock markets in Middle Eastern countries Impact of factory certifications on firm resources: a quantitative content analysis of the Bangladeshi readymade garments (RMG) industry Corporate cash holding and firm’s performance in times of Ukraine war: a literature review and way forward Beyond the seams: evaluating competitiveness and comparative advantage in Vietnam’s apparel industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1