Public Opinion Disclaimer on Enforcement of Public Activity Restrictions (PPKM): A Content Analysis

Lukita Ummahati, I. Sihidi
{"title":"Public Opinion Disclaimer on Enforcement of Public Activity Restrictions (PPKM): A Content Analysis","authors":"Lukita Ummahati, I. Sihidi","doi":"10.19109/jssp.v6i1.9837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The high increase in Covid-19 in Indonesia is a concern for many parties. Thus, the policy taken by the government is the Imposition of Emergency Community Activity Restrictions (PPKM). The policy reaped the pros and cons in the community. This study aims to analyze the community's perspective (netizens) expressed through social media in assessing the implementation of emergency PPKM. This study utilizes qualitative descriptive methods and uses secondary data through social media in the form of Twitter and is analyzed using a content analysis approach. This study focuses on analyzing the trend of public perception (citizens) regarding the topic of conversation about rejection and demonstration (Tolak & Demo) of PPKM through the results of Social Network Analysis (SNA) obtained through Drone Emprit. The results show that most PPKM policies get widespread rejection in the community because the impacts are mostly negative, such as getting poorer people because of limited access to work. The domination of the denial was driven by pro-opposition accounts that campaigned against PPKM in the form of demonstrations. The contribution of this research shows that Twitter can be a space for public participation in responding to government policies (democracy). This research has limitations because it only focuses on Twitter, so further studies need to look at the use of other social media such as Instagram and YouTube.","PeriodicalId":33553,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Studi Sosial dan Politik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Studi Sosial dan Politik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19109/jssp.v6i1.9837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The high increase in Covid-19 in Indonesia is a concern for many parties. Thus, the policy taken by the government is the Imposition of Emergency Community Activity Restrictions (PPKM). The policy reaped the pros and cons in the community. This study aims to analyze the community's perspective (netizens) expressed through social media in assessing the implementation of emergency PPKM. This study utilizes qualitative descriptive methods and uses secondary data through social media in the form of Twitter and is analyzed using a content analysis approach. This study focuses on analyzing the trend of public perception (citizens) regarding the topic of conversation about rejection and demonstration (Tolak & Demo) of PPKM through the results of Social Network Analysis (SNA) obtained through Drone Emprit. The results show that most PPKM policies get widespread rejection in the community because the impacts are mostly negative, such as getting poorer people because of limited access to work. The domination of the denial was driven by pro-opposition accounts that campaigned against PPKM in the form of demonstrations. The contribution of this research shows that Twitter can be a space for public participation in responding to government policies (democracy). This research has limitations because it only focuses on Twitter, so further studies need to look at the use of other social media such as Instagram and YouTube.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共活动限制执行的舆论免责:内容分析
新冠肺炎疫情在印尼的高增长引起各方关注。因此,政府采取的政策是实施紧急社区活动限制(PPKM)。这项政策在社会上有利有弊。本研究旨在分析社群(网民)透过社群媒体表达的观点,以评估应急PPKM的执行情况。本研究采用定性描述方法,并通过Twitter形式的社交媒体使用二手数据,并使用内容分析方法进行分析。本研究的重点是通过Drone Emprit获得的社会网络分析(Social Network Analysis, SNA)的结果,分析公众(公民)对PPKM的拒绝和演示(Tolak & Demo)话题的感知趋势。结果表明,大多数PPKM政策在社区中遭到广泛反对,因为其影响大多是负面的,例如由于工作机会有限而使人们变得更穷。否认的主导地位是由亲反对派的账户推动的,这些账户以示威的形式反对PPKM。这项研究的贡献表明,Twitter可以成为公众参与回应政府政策(民主)的空间。这项研究有局限性,因为它只关注Twitter,所以进一步的研究需要关注Instagram和YouTube等其他社交媒体的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Indonesia’s Identity and Norms in Response to the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict in 2020: A Constructivism View #MeToo Movement: Global Civil Society in Fighting Sexual Harassment in South Korea Power Relation and Cooperation between Actors: Issue of Nickel Mining Business Licenses in Konawe Regency Political Communication Instruments Fasha Maulana In Influencing Millennial Voter: Evidence from Jambi Mayoral Election in 2019 Community Empowerment and Social Welfare Development through Social Entrepreneurship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1