A two-stage multi-attribute group consensus model based on distributed linguistic assessment information from the perspective of fairness concern

IF 1.2 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Adaptive Behavior Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI:10.1177/10597123221126208
Shanli Zhang, Shitao Zhang, Zhenzhen Ma, Xiaodi Liu
{"title":"A two-stage multi-attribute group consensus model based on distributed linguistic assessment information from the perspective of fairness concern","authors":"Shanli Zhang, Shitao Zhang, Zhenzhen Ma, Xiaodi Liu","doi":"10.1177/10597123221126208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The consensus reaching process (CRP) is a key step in group decision-making (GDM), in which reaching a satisfactory consensus often requires certain costs, such as time, money, and effort. Moreover, benefits from the CRP are often compared among decision-makers, which raises fairness issues. Given these, this paper comprehensively considers these two factors in linguistic GDM modeling. Aiming at the problem of multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) under distributed linguistic assessment (DLA) information, a two-stage group consensus model that considers psychological behaviors with fairness concern is proposed. Subsequently, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed model are illustrated by a case of selecting emergency material warehouses related to urban flood disasters. The main innovations and contributions of this paper are as follows. (a) The psychology of individual fairness concern is integrated into the MAGDM process with DLA information. (b) The DLA-based two-stage group consensus model, including the first-stage consensus model with maximum fairness satisfaction degree and the second-stage consensus model with minimum cost, is developed. Compared with the existing consensus models for distributed linguistic MAGDM, the proposed consensus model can not only improve the consensus level on the opinions with minimum cost but also promote the fairness satisfaction degree of decision-makers.","PeriodicalId":55552,"journal":{"name":"Adaptive Behavior","volume":"31 1","pages":"213 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adaptive Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123221126208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The consensus reaching process (CRP) is a key step in group decision-making (GDM), in which reaching a satisfactory consensus often requires certain costs, such as time, money, and effort. Moreover, benefits from the CRP are often compared among decision-makers, which raises fairness issues. Given these, this paper comprehensively considers these two factors in linguistic GDM modeling. Aiming at the problem of multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) under distributed linguistic assessment (DLA) information, a two-stage group consensus model that considers psychological behaviors with fairness concern is proposed. Subsequently, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed model are illustrated by a case of selecting emergency material warehouses related to urban flood disasters. The main innovations and contributions of this paper are as follows. (a) The psychology of individual fairness concern is integrated into the MAGDM process with DLA information. (b) The DLA-based two-stage group consensus model, including the first-stage consensus model with maximum fairness satisfaction degree and the second-stage consensus model with minimum cost, is developed. Compared with the existing consensus models for distributed linguistic MAGDM, the proposed consensus model can not only improve the consensus level on the opinions with minimum cost but also promote the fairness satisfaction degree of decision-makers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公平关注视角下基于分布式语言评估信息的两阶段多属性群体共识模型
达成共识过程(CRP)是群体决策(GDM)的关键步骤,在群体决策中,达成令人满意的共识通常需要一定的成本,如时间、金钱和精力。此外,决策者经常比较CRP带来的好处,这引发了公平问题。鉴于此,本文在语言GDM建模中综合考虑了这两个因素。针对分布式语言评估信息下的多属性群体决策问题,提出了一种考虑公平心理行为的两阶段群体共识模型。随后,以城市洪涝灾害应急物资仓库的选择为例,说明了该模型的可行性和有效性。本文的主要创新和贡献如下。(a) 将个体公平关注心理与DLA信息整合到MAGDM过程中。(b) 开发了基于DLA的两阶段群体共识模型,包括具有最大公平满意度的第一阶段共识模型和具有最小成本的第二阶段共识模型。与现有的分布式语言MAGDM共识模型相比,所提出的共识模型不仅能以最小的成本提高意见的共识水平,还能提高决策者的公平满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Adaptive Behavior
Adaptive Behavior 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
18.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: _Adaptive Behavior_ publishes articles on adaptive behaviour in living organisms and autonomous artificial systems. The official journal of the _International Society of Adaptive Behavior_, _Adaptive Behavior_, addresses topics such as perception and motor control, embodied cognition, learning and evolution, neural mechanisms, artificial intelligence, behavioral sequences, motivation and emotion, characterization of environments, decision making, collective and social behavior, navigation, foraging, communication and signalling. Print ISSN: 1059-7123
期刊最新文献
Environmental complexity, cognition, and plant stress physiology A model of how hierarchical representations constructed in the hippocampus are used to navigate through space Mechanical Problem Solving in Goffin’s Cockatoos—Towards Modeling Complex Behavior Coupling First-Person Cognitive Research With Neurophilosophy and Enactivism: An Outline of Arguments The origin and function of external representations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1