Examining the Quality of Individualized Education Program (IEP) Goals for Children With Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Communication Disorders Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-11-30 DOI:10.1177/1525740120976113
K. Goodwin, K. Farquharson, Christina Yeager Pelatti, Whitney Schneider-Cline, Judy Harvey, E. Bush
{"title":"Examining the Quality of Individualized Education Program (IEP) Goals for Children With Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)","authors":"K. Goodwin, K. Farquharson, Christina Yeager Pelatti, Whitney Schneider-Cline, Judy Harvey, E. Bush","doi":"10.1177/1525740120976113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this descriptive study was to investigate the quality of Individualized Education Program (IEP) goals for students with traumatic brain injury (TBI) using an empirically based rating instrument. One hundred twenty-five IEP goals for 49 students with TBI were coded using the Revised IEP/IFSP Goals and Objective Rating Instrument (R-GORI; Notari). Using this dichotomous measure, we analyzed the quality of IEP goals across six areas: observability, measurability, functionality, generalizability, application in daily tasks, and clarity of goals. On average, students had three IEP goals (range: 1–8). The average goal quality score was 3.74 (range: 1–6). While most of the goals were measurable, only a few contained details about how the goals could be generalized beyond the specific educational or therapeutic environment. These findings highlight variability in the quality of IEP goals, which may have implications to the therapeutic environment and child outcomes.","PeriodicalId":46403,"journal":{"name":"Communication Disorders Quarterly","volume":"43 1","pages":"96 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1525740120976113","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Disorders Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740120976113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this descriptive study was to investigate the quality of Individualized Education Program (IEP) goals for students with traumatic brain injury (TBI) using an empirically based rating instrument. One hundred twenty-five IEP goals for 49 students with TBI were coded using the Revised IEP/IFSP Goals and Objective Rating Instrument (R-GORI; Notari). Using this dichotomous measure, we analyzed the quality of IEP goals across six areas: observability, measurability, functionality, generalizability, application in daily tasks, and clarity of goals. On average, students had three IEP goals (range: 1–8). The average goal quality score was 3.74 (range: 1–6). While most of the goals were measurable, only a few contained details about how the goals could be generalized beyond the specific educational or therapeutic environment. These findings highlight variability in the quality of IEP goals, which may have implications to the therapeutic environment and child outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤性脑损伤(TBI)儿童个体化教育计划(IEP)目标的质量检验
本描述性研究的目的是使用一种基于经验的评级工具来调查创伤性脑损伤(TBI)学生个性化教育计划(IEP)目标的质量。采用修订后的IEP/IFSP目标和客观评定工具(R-GORI;Notari)。使用这种两分法,我们从六个方面分析了IEP目标的质量:可观察性、可测量性、功能性、概括性、在日常任务中的应用以及目标的清晰度。学生平均有三个IEP目标(范围:1-8)。平均进球质量得分为3.74分(范围:1-6)。虽然大多数目标是可测量的,但只有少数包含了如何将目标推广到特定教育或治疗环境之外的细节。这些发现强调了IEP目标质量的可变性,这可能对治疗环境和儿童预后有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Articles for Communication Disorders Quarterly (CDQ) are accepted for review on a continual basis. The editor of CDQ welcomes submissions of previously unpublished applied and clinical research relating to typical and atypical communication across the lifespan. This includes assessment of and interventions for communicative disorders in infants, toddlers, young children, school-age children, youth, and adults. The readers of CDQ represent a breadth of viewpoints and professional interests, which is also reflected in the diversity of interests and expertise of the editorial board members. The journal is particularly of interest to speech–language pathologists and teachers of the deaf and hard of hearing. CDQ uses a masked peer review process for submissions.
期刊最新文献
Strategies Used by University Students With Dyslexia: A Narrative Review Speech Rate of Children With Developmental Language Disorder in a Narrative Context Plasma Levels of Thiamine and Histamine in Childhood-Onset Stuttering AAC Business as Usual: Clinical Practice of School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists Development of Phonological Error Patterns in Arabic-Speaking Children in Jordan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1