Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on Colombian anesthesiologists: Survey study

Sebastian Amaya, Marcelino Murillo, Boris Julián Pinto Bustamante, Nubia Sánchez-Bello, María José Mateus Parra, M. J. Andrade, Natalia González Zárate, María Paula Pérez, J. J. Maya, Valentina Monsalve, Nashla Fayad Fayad, Gabriela Rosero Belalcázar, Ilana Charul-Palacio
{"title":"Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on Colombian anesthesiologists: Survey study","authors":"Sebastian Amaya, Marcelino Murillo, Boris Julián Pinto Bustamante, Nubia Sánchez-Bello, María José Mateus Parra, M. J. Andrade, Natalia González Zárate, María Paula Pérez, J. J. Maya, Valentina Monsalve, Nashla Fayad Fayad, Gabriela Rosero Belalcázar, Ilana Charul-Palacio","doi":"10.5554/22562087.e1016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The practice of anesthesiology during the COVID-19 pandemic has had a psychological impact, and has been associated with ethical dilemmas, work overload, and occupational risk. \nObjective: To understand different problems affecting anesthesiologists, in particular with regards to professional ethics in the decision-making process, increased personal workload, and the potential risk in terms of their own safety and health, as a consequence of working during the COVID-19 pandemic. \nMethods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. A survey was administered to the anesthesiologists members of the Colombian Society of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation (S.C.A.R.E.), to enquire about work hours, occupational safety, prevention standards and strategies, and ethical aspects involved in decision making. \nResults: 218 anesthesiologist participated in the survey. Most of the respondents felt that there was not a significant increase in their workload, except for those in critical care (42.5 %; n = 17). Most of the participants believe that leisure time is not enough. 55.96 % (n = 122) of the participants said they felt moderately safe with the biosecurity measures, but with a higher risk of contagion versus other practitioners, with 72.9 % (n = 159) and they said they used their own money to buy personal protection equipment (PPE). There was also evidence that one fourth of the respondents has faced ethical dilemmas during the resuscitation of SARS-CoV-2 – infected patients. \nConclusion: The information gathered is a preliminary approach to the situation arising in Colombia as a result of the pandemic; it is clear that anesthesiologists perceive higher associated lack of safety due to different factors such as higher risk of infection, shortage of PEEs and   burnout, inter alia. Hence we believe that it is fundamental to acknowledge the work of all anesthesiologists and understand the impact that the pandemic has had on this group of professionals.","PeriodicalId":36529,"journal":{"name":"Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5554/22562087.e1016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The practice of anesthesiology during the COVID-19 pandemic has had a psychological impact, and has been associated with ethical dilemmas, work overload, and occupational risk. Objective: To understand different problems affecting anesthesiologists, in particular with regards to professional ethics in the decision-making process, increased personal workload, and the potential risk in terms of their own safety and health, as a consequence of working during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. A survey was administered to the anesthesiologists members of the Colombian Society of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation (S.C.A.R.E.), to enquire about work hours, occupational safety, prevention standards and strategies, and ethical aspects involved in decision making. Results: 218 anesthesiologist participated in the survey. Most of the respondents felt that there was not a significant increase in their workload, except for those in critical care (42.5 %; n = 17). Most of the participants believe that leisure time is not enough. 55.96 % (n = 122) of the participants said they felt moderately safe with the biosecurity measures, but with a higher risk of contagion versus other practitioners, with 72.9 % (n = 159) and they said they used their own money to buy personal protection equipment (PPE). There was also evidence that one fourth of the respondents has faced ethical dilemmas during the resuscitation of SARS-CoV-2 – infected patients. Conclusion: The information gathered is a preliminary approach to the situation arising in Colombia as a result of the pandemic; it is clear that anesthesiologists perceive higher associated lack of safety due to different factors such as higher risk of infection, shortage of PEEs and   burnout, inter alia. Hence we believe that it is fundamental to acknowledge the work of all anesthesiologists and understand the impact that the pandemic has had on this group of professionals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARS-CoV-2大流行对哥伦比亚麻醉师的影响:调查研究
简介:新冠肺炎大流行期间的麻醉学实践产生了心理影响,并与道德困境、工作过载和职业风险有关。目的:了解影响麻醉师的不同问题,特别是决策过程中的职业道德、增加的个人工作量以及在新冠肺炎大流行期间工作对自身安全和健康的潜在风险。方法:观察、描述性、横断面研究。对哥伦比亚麻醉与复苏学会(S.C.A.R.E.)的麻醉师成员进行了一项调查,询问工作时间、职业安全、预防标准和策略以及决策中涉及的道德问题。结果:218名麻醉师参加了调查。大多数受访者认为他们的工作量没有显著增加,但重症监护除外(42.5%;n=17)。大多数参与者认为休闲时间是不够的。55.96%(n=122)的参与者表示,他们对生物安全措施感到适度安全,但与其他从业者相比,传染风险更高,72.9%(n=159)的参与者说,他们用自己的钱购买了个人防护设备。还有证据表明,四分之一的受访者在严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染患者的复苏过程中面临道德困境。结论:所收集的信息是对哥伦比亚因新冠疫情而出现的局势的初步处理办法;很明显,麻醉师认为,由于不同的因素,如感染风险更高、PEEs短缺和倦怠等,相关的安全性缺乏程度更高。因此,我们认为,承认所有麻醉师的工作并了解疫情对这群专业人员的影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology
Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The environmental responsibility of modern anesthesiology and perioperative care Características del paro cardiaco extrahospitalario atendido por operadores de ambulancias en Medellín. Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de base poblacional Shortage of perioperative supplies and drugs: Theory and practical implications Respuesta hemodinámica a dosis subanestésicas de ketamina en dolor posoperatorio: revisión sistemática ChatGPT's learning and reasoning capacity in anesthesiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1