Individual learning strategies and other characteristics of e-learning in the first phase of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH E-Mentor Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.15219/em95.1568
Katarzyna Smoter
{"title":"Individual learning strategies and other characteristics of e-learning in the first phase of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Katarzyna Smoter","doi":"10.15219/em95.1568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One aspect of university governance during the Covid - 19 pandemic was the introduction of compulsory distance learning. This set-up required significant modifications in the organisation of the teaching-learning process, becoming an area of reflection in the field of academic didactics. The main addressees of the described educational change were female and male students - entities who chose different paths to achieve their learning goals. The analysis subject of this article is to identify such characteristics as, inter alia, their learning strategies, ways of evaluating online classes or emotions experienced in a learning situation. The pilot studies were carried out in the first phase of introducing remote university teaching, and were done using a unique questionnaire. The theoretical basis of the research was the learning theory of adults, described by M. Knowles, co-creators of the teaching-learning process, selecting methods of action to specific problems. In this article we refer to the description of the strategy (individual learning) according to R. Arends (1998), as well as other issues related to remote university learning, i.e. evaluation of one's own study process, satisfaction with studying and emotions evoked by the necessity to learn remotely. Referring to the research results, the most frequently chosen strategies were those around working with 'written text': highlighting the most important information, creating notes or adding comments in the text. On the other hand, online classes were often of low value for the students. The obtained results also indicate the predominance of negative feelings and states related to anxiety, anger or disappointment with the remote organisation of university work.","PeriodicalId":42136,"journal":{"name":"E-Mentor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E-Mentor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15219/em95.1568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One aspect of university governance during the Covid - 19 pandemic was the introduction of compulsory distance learning. This set-up required significant modifications in the organisation of the teaching-learning process, becoming an area of reflection in the field of academic didactics. The main addressees of the described educational change were female and male students - entities who chose different paths to achieve their learning goals. The analysis subject of this article is to identify such characteristics as, inter alia, their learning strategies, ways of evaluating online classes or emotions experienced in a learning situation. The pilot studies were carried out in the first phase of introducing remote university teaching, and were done using a unique questionnaire. The theoretical basis of the research was the learning theory of adults, described by M. Knowles, co-creators of the teaching-learning process, selecting methods of action to specific problems. In this article we refer to the description of the strategy (individual learning) according to R. Arends (1998), as well as other issues related to remote university learning, i.e. evaluation of one's own study process, satisfaction with studying and emotions evoked by the necessity to learn remotely. Referring to the research results, the most frequently chosen strategies were those around working with 'written text': highlighting the most important information, creating notes or adding comments in the text. On the other hand, online classes were often of low value for the students. The obtained results also indicate the predominance of negative feelings and states related to anxiety, anger or disappointment with the remote organisation of university work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间在线学习第一阶段的个人学习策略和电子学习的其他特征
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,大学治理的一个方面是引入强制性远程学习。这种设置需要对教学过程的组织进行重大修改,成为学术教学领域的一个反思领域。所描述的教育变化的主要对象是女性和男性学生,他们选择不同的路径来实现他们的学习目标。本文的分析主题是确定这些特征,特别是他们的学习策略,评估在线课程的方式或在学习情境中体验的情绪。试点研究是在引进远程大学教学的第一阶段进行的,使用了一份独特的问卷。该研究的理论基础是成人的学习理论,由教学过程的共同创造者M. Knowles描述,选择针对特定问题的行动方法。在本文中,我们参考了R. Arends(1998)对远程大学学习策略(个人学习)的描述,以及与远程大学学习相关的其他问题,即对自己学习过程的评价、对学习的满意度和远程学习必要性引起的情绪。根据研究结果,最常被选择的策略是那些与“书面文本”有关的策略:突出最重要的信息,在文本中创建注释或添加评论。另一方面,在线课程通常对学生来说价值很低。获得的结果还表明,与大学工作的远程组织有关的负面情绪和状态占主导地位,这些情绪和状态与焦虑、愤怒或失望有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
E-Mentor
E-Mentor EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Job satisfaction of managers of small business units in the perspective of remote work - pilot research Academic tutoring and the assumptions of education 4.0. Towards a personalised approach and building a learning culture at the university Aligning education with labour market needs: Identifying key competencies for graduates from economic fields Success factors for the development of FinTech entities on the Polish market: a case study New technologies in the face of AI challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1